McCain will deny the story and say he was not there! Someone else with a baseball cap! Jerks....."I don't know what you're talking about"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rachel now has stooooooooopppppppeeeeeeedddddddd
To the lowest of the lowest...Enough will all the manipulation of weak minds..her bias is just getting to the point that she is a perfect reason to be pasted up when she is on the air. The channel goes to CNN or Fox. The wannabe man is bias and down outright lies by only showing a tiny sound bite to prove her lies-Shame on you ...She and Oberman are toxic and seems to be up Obama's rear end...neither drama queens are believable....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Does anyone remotely believe, in our wildest, far-right, Christian imaginations that a man who shamed then dumped his spouse and children after they waited years for him (while he was supposedly in a POW camp) would change? Look what he's done. The investigative reporters would have swarmed on our black candidate had there been the remotest indication of adultry. A "lamb" in the mere wolf's clothing, although the purple hat kind of barks, John. Come clean, now, John - they'll understand - fur sure.

Let's hope another wife doesn't "stand by her man" as Mizzy Edwards so blatently did, marginalizing Americans while they fiddled with the truth.

They're all nuts, folks, and btw, Cokie, grow up. We'll never forget your comments about diverting Ole Miss (at the time of Katrina), which could save millions of lives and dollars up stream, and NO, itself; self-centered, aristocrats should know enough to be quiet.

(read:"545 PEOPLE", by Charlie Reese)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]