Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Preview for Tonight: Palin and Biden Talk Church and State

Posted by Melissa McEwan, Shakesville at 12:48 PM on October 2, 2008.


Both give talking point answers, but one definitely looks a lot more comfortable.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 


Katie Couric: Thomas Jefferson wrote about the First Amendment, building a wall of separation between church and state. Why do you think that's so important?

Sarah Palin: His intention in expressing that was so that government did not mandate a religion on the people. And Thomas Jefferson also said never underestimate the wisdom of the people. And the wisdom of the people, I think, in this issue is that people have the right and the ability and the desire to express their own religious views, be it on a very personal level, which is where I choose to express my faith, or in a more public forum. And the wisdom of the people, thankfully, engrained in the foundation of our country is so extremely important. And Thomas Jefferson wanted to protect that.

Biden: The best way to look at it is look at every state where that wall's not built. Look at every country in the world where religion is able to impact on the governance. Almost every one of those countries, there's real turmoil. Look, the founders were pretty smart. They had gone through, you know, several hundred years of wars—religious wars. They were in the midst of religious wars in Europe. And they figured it out: The best way to do this is keep the government out of religion. They took religion out of government, but they didn't mean religion couldn't be in a public place, in the public square.

So, nothing particularly controversial or shocking here. Pretty standard talking points of both parties, with the biggest distinction arising from a curious inflection in Palin's response: "His intention in expressing that was so that government did not mandate a religion on the people," clearly suggesting that she believes (which is, again, standard GOP dogma) that the government cannot mandate one religion, but can mandate law rooted in religious beliefs—which is why they always say "Judeo-Christian" teachings, to inoculate their legislated morality against the charge it's rooted in a single religion.

Most informative, IMO, is that, while they both successfully deliver their respective talking points, one of them clearly looks more comfortable and confident doing it. I don’t know if it's an accurate glimpse into what the debate may look like tonight, but it could be.

Digg!

Tagged as: church, biden, couric, state, palin

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


'The End of America,' Liberty: Use It or Lose It
A look at the compelling new documentary based on Naomi Wolf's book of the same name.
Post by Staff. December 3, 2008.
'Prop 8: The Musical' Starring Jack Black, John C. Reilly, and More
From the hilarious folks at Funny or Die.
Post by Staff. December 3, 2008.
The Election of Obama and the White Supremacist Threat
It's the taboo subject you're not supposed to talk about -- Barack Obama's safety in light of the rise of white supremacists in America.
Post by Davin Hutchins. December 2, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Palin's word salad goes into interesting territory.
Posted by: lexicon on Oct 2, 2008 2:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the words are "...make no laws respecting an establishment of religion,or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Of course, Scalia and I will agree to disagree here, but the word "respecting" has two meanings. First, (in no particular order) it means "giving respect to", and second, it means "in reference to" or "with respect to" or "about".

I believe both meanings are intended. In the first meaning, it means that government cannot "notice" or "acknowledge" a religion, and in the second, it cannot make laws that that reference that religion.

The free exercise clause reinforces the negative connotations of the establishment clause, providing an explicit negation of government's right (i.e. the PEOPLE's right) to DISRESPECT a religion.


That's not a very controversial view of the first ammendment, by any stretch.

However, Palin's view IS controversial. She's inferred that the "people, in their wisdom" may act according to their religious faith.

That's not the controversial part. She's made it clear that she considers people SUCH AS HERSELF, a GOVERNOR, may CHOOSE, AS THEY SEE FIT, IN THEIR WISDOM, to act by expressing their religious position in the course of their work.

In other words, she acknowledges that the government can't recognize religion, but says that the GOVERNOR can. (and by extension, the VP and POTUS).

In other words, she gave a non-answer word salad that sounded like it meant something, but didn't.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bimbospeak
Posted by: Blondinista on Oct 2, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we've had quite enough, thank you, of leaders who are incapable of stringing words together into concise, coherent sentences. And we've also had enough of leaders who haven't yet figured out the finer points of subject-verb agreement. Who doesn't cringe whenever that woman opens her mouth to speak?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bimbospeak Posted by: peacefullaim
Poor soul.
Posted by: paula.c on Oct 2, 2008 7:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She can't speak straight on ANY topic much less religion. Is she stupid, nervous or just plain crazy? Put her out in the pasture where she can gaze upon her neighbor Russia and have hockey mom reveries. She is not even fit to be the mayor of Wasilla, Alaska.

Maybe she will drop out of the race tonight. As I listen to the debate, she is stumbling all over the place and talking in circles. Poor soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poor soul. Posted by: peacefullaim
She is real..your just used to
Posted by: niliadis on Oct 2, 2008 8:53 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin is real! you are just used to hearing the lies, low downs and the lies most politician from Washington..She is real, just like yuo and I and most manstream America!
She is not polished, she is not the 'Typical Politician" she is smart, knowlegeable and certainly more experience than 'Risky Obama"
Remember she's been in front of the world only for the past 5 weeks..I sure wished that Obama would have not been given the free pass, so we could have know him more he would not be where he is at....The cover up of the media has done us much harm and we will pay the price...
I say give a long and hard look at Obama and his Associations that the media has kept undercover..Joe's a nice guy-He should have been the one...Obama is dangerous and risky..He will probably win and we will all find out..can't cry over spilt milk-Prepare for despair!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: She is real..your just used to Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: She is real..your just used to Posted by: Blondinista
Palin-A star is Born, A real Star is born
Posted by: niliadis on Oct 2, 2008 9:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sarah Palin proved today she is Real!!! being real and connecting with mainstream America is the name of the game...not typical politician-The politician we now have are all toxic! Country first!!! Obama's associaitons really have only proven-not Country First...Obama sat in a church of Hate American for TWenty Years, listening and pracitcin Black Theology with his friend and MENTOR; WRIGHT
No Obama is not real..he talks and talks, yet his rehtoric is all BS-He is a Risk!
Palin may not be the most experience, but as mayor, Govenor with exective experience, energy, tax cuts and 85% approval in her state speaks volums..Obama a Jr. Senator of 173 days and one speach with 190 voting Present in his shor time has come this far because of our wonderful Vulnerable Americans hungry for change who have been dupped by this hope! What change can Obama bring us??? None-He is a big risk! Thanks but no Thanks! No Risky Obama for mainstream America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

She is the master of the non answer.
Posted by: bitsfick on Oct 3, 2008 2:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I CAN'T STAND IT, SHE TALKS IN PLATITUDES, AND LIES HER BRAINS OUT. She took on the big oil companies, and then baked cookies for the girl scouts. She is tough, she has an answer for everything, it's not the right answer, it's not an intelligent answer, but she deliveries it with that folksy down home I am one of you smiles and the idiots in this country will eat it up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]