Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Media Mash: The media battle over predator protection

Posted by The Masher at 6:02 PM on October 3, 2006.


In the scramble to escape responsibility, the Republicans' desperate scapegoating is going full tilt.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

There's a mad scramble by Republicans to prevent a total meltdown political disaster from the Foley revelations and the ongoing predator cover-up. The heat on Dennis Hastert to resign as Speaker increases by the hour. But these guys have no shame. The race to scapegoat and avoid responsibility is escalating.

Rush Limbaugh had Hastert on his show, with Hastert claiming that the Foley Scandal Is A Liberal Conspiracy To 'Get To Me' And 'Affect Our Election.' He promised Limbaugh "we are going on offense." The "offense" is an effort to portray the scandal as a conspiracy specifically timed by liberals.

Limbaugh, of course is in tune: "Well, it's clear to me that what the Democrats are doing here in some sort of cooperation with some in the media is to suppress conservative turnout by making it look like you guys knew this all along but because you're so interested in holding the House rather than protecting children that you covered it up."

Some Democrats are quickly going full bore to take advantage of the Republican mess: check out this ad for Patty Wetterling, Congressional candidate in the 6th District in Minnesota. Many are urging other Dem. candidates to get on the air quickly with similar attacks.

Fundamentally, this is primarily battle for the hearts and minds of the religious voters who have given the Republicans their edge since 2000, but who are shaking their heads right now. The latest shocking revelation are Instant Messages in the hands of ABC's Brian Ross, where Foley is, in essence, having internet sex with an 18-year-old while waiting for a vote on the House floor. Ross, who broke this story, continues to ladle out mind boggling new developments every day. What else is waiting in the wings? ABC News now has obtained 52 separate instant message exchanges, which former pages say were sent by Foley, using the screen name Maf54, to two different boys under the age of 18.

A second front on the scapeboating effort is the link right-wingers are attempting to make between homosexuals and pedophiles, insisting that "Pro-Homosexual Political Correctness Sowed Seeds for Foley Scandal," according to Family Research Council President Tony Perkins:

"This is the end result of a society that rejects sexual restraints in the name of diversity. If our children aren't safe in the halls of Congress, where are they safe? Maybe it's time to question: when is tolerance just an excuse for permissiveness?"
It seems a big leap to think that the permissive society of diversity and liberals are responsible for Tom Foley's fiasco, and the Republicans long-term collusion to cover it up -- because they had to be so politically correct. How about they wanted to win elections, pure and simple? Wouldn't it be swell if there was RICO statute that covers conspiracy to protect Congressional pedophiles? Then we'd see a long line of Republican leaders on their way to the slammer.

Digg!

The Masher reveals inner secrets and social linkages, while exposing the media misbehaviors of the corporate bad guys.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Actually
Posted by: fifthworld on Oct 3, 2006 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's a REPRESSIVE society due just as much to "liberalism" at large than to some over-stereotyped conservatism. Same American tea bag (oops) that's really out of touch with human nature - bodily, polymorphous, inescapably vulnerable and often demented.

So the Repub. leadership is doing the scapegoating? And what are we all too cheerful to do? The same stupid gleeful Puritanical finger-pointing that "they" would do if this were Nancy Pelosi and some string of emails to 'boy' pages about giving them handjobs in her office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What kind of scandal is it?
Posted by: lamar on Oct 4, 2006 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a sex scandal with no sex, a jailbait story with no jailbait (at least not in DC). It's all about hypocrisy, lies and corruption. As far as I know, regular Joe Schmo can chat dirty with a 16 year-old in DC. Of course, regular Joe Schmo doesn't head the caucus against exploitation of children. And regular Joe Schmo doesn't have flocks of self-righteous and power hungry GOP politicians covering up for his dirty-old-man behavior. This, to me, isn't about Foley's need to know the size of a page's cock. This is about corruption and greed, hypocrisy and incompetence. Please correct me if I'm wrong about the law being broken.

It just seems that this is a story that religious rightnuts and GOPers see as a damning and prurient sex scandal, but moderates and lefties see as a power-mad corruption scandal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About Patty Wetterling
Posted by: chaoslegs on Oct 4, 2006 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately she is behind the 6th district to a real mean (some would say evil) woman Michelle Bachman. But when you listen to the ad, and you think about her past, she is just continuing the fight she has been doing for 17 years.

So while you could easily mislead by saying she being opportunistic in the new ad, I think it is dishonest because it is a core issue of who she is. Imagine that Feingold is up for election, some scandal comes about abuses regarding the Patriot Act, and he runs a quick ad against the abuses. Since he was the only Senator to vote against it, he has the right to highlight his opposition.

I say Patty has the right call for the protection of minors from predatory adults. As her son was/is a victim.

-Minneapolis (not in 6th district)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DOES ANYBODY KNOW?
Posted by: lamar on Oct 4, 2006 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act

The legal age of consent in DC is 16, and isn't affected by difference in ages. Does anyone know if there is a federal law that prohibits what Foley allegedly did? The Adam Walsh law does not appear to do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

About time
Posted by: randyf on Oct 4, 2006 3:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to see this point made more: the Republicans (beginning with the extremely sleazy Mr. Gingrich) conflating homosexuality with pedophilia.

Homosexuals are, in fact, no more likely to be pedophiles than straights. Where is the outrage on this new Republican "talking point?"

"We don't want to be accused of gay-bashing," says Newt. Since exactly WHEN, Mr. Gingrich?

Besides, the very idea of this as a gender-specific sex crime is obscene. This is about respected adults, in positions of authority, USING that authority to lure underage boys and girls to perform sex acts while their parents are expecting Congress to take care of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It has always been
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 4, 2006 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tyrants generally find a reason for their tyranny, in the orders which they have received from their superiors in authority; this is for them a wide cloak, which can cover much evil. In the meantime they vent their anger, yea, rejoice in their wickedness, while the unoffending and innocent have to suffer.

Now, if this would obtain only with the worldly, what would it matter, knowing that they are worldlyminded; but even the so-called ecclesiastics or clergy, who are credited with everything good, are guilty in this matter.

All this is briefly shown, in the beginning of the fifteenth book of the Chronijk van den Ondergang der Tyrannen, with these words, "In the year 1401 a decree was issued in England, against the confessors of the Gospel, or those who gave them assistance or showed them favor; in consequence of which much innocent blood was shed by the ecclesiastical prelates, priests, and monks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]