Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lieberman is doomed

Posted by Jan Frel at 6:36 PM on July 30, 2006.


Bill and Hillary Clinton and the rest of the political class should be shaking in their boots after the Times' Lamont endorsement.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

"In a primary like this, [Bill Clinton's] legacy is on the line. Because the group that is opposing me is not, does not really believe in the same kind of politics Bill Clinton believes in, that brought us two wins in two national elections." -- Joe Lieberman in Sunday's New York Times.

The New York Times' endorsement of Ned Lamont over Joe Lieberman signals a lot of things. First and foremost, it means that the NYT believes that Ned Lamont is going to win the Democratic Senate primary in Connecticut. Editorial pages are cowardly by nature, and the NYT's is no exception. Second, this endorsement is certainly the preliminary massive shock to the entire DC political class, which has held very close around Lieberman and the issue he's out in front on, Iraq.

While a Lamont victory would appear certain to political observers online, my experience tells me that the real shock and political uncertainty will come when Lieberman loses in the race itself. The quote above from Lieberman makes it clear that his loss will hurt more than his own putrid political legacy: it will deliver a sore blow to the legacy of Bill Clinton and the presidential hopes of Hillary Clinton. While many of the "group that is opposing" Lieberman -- read Connecticut activists and online progressive -- probably don't harbor as much resentment against Clinton as Lieberman thinks, he's right that they don't truly believe in the "same kind of politics Bill Clinton believes in" -- media buys, a consultant class, political expertise, American empire, shameless opportunism, and a disdain for democratic impulses.

Watch the desperate flailing on Iraq to emerge not just from creepy Democrats like Joe Biden, but hundreds of Republicans who haven't really offered any position of Iraq other than the support of George Bush. What's so bizarre of course, is that while public sentiment is massively against the war, and that a guy like Lieberman is going down, the antiwar movement doesn't have any form whatsoever.

Digg!

Jan Frel is an AlterNet staff writer.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The NYT better have inside info that Diebold's been hacked
Posted by: xbj on Jul 31, 2006 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Ney York Times had better have inside info that the Democrats have found a way to hack the already hacked Diebold and ES&S "GOP delivered" vote tallies... otherwise, Lieberman, GOP mole, will win by a landslide, no matter HOW he runs.

It never ceases to amaze me how each election cycle, institutions and people get their hopes up that this time it will be different, that yes, we truly DO live in a REAL Democracy, and yet, how easily they just shrug their shoulders after the clearly bogus results come in and say
"Aw shucks folks, guess we was wrong.... AGAIN."

"Now on to Brangelina...."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

clementime
Posted by: inclement on Jul 31, 2006 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If they spent this campaign money on election reform and getting rid of electronic voting machines, then maybe we could become a democracy again.

GOP's electronic voting machines will control the outcome of any and all elections.

Why has not the dem's party and the voting public realized these campaigns are a fraud and big business. You votes do not count.

election campaigns are just business and make money for everyone, campaigners do not worry about the outcome of the vote. The campaigners are getting rich off the campaigns.

Stop donating to these campaign frauds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sigh...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Jul 31, 2006 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can we please just stop talking about this dog already and let him fade into the obscurity he so richly deserves.

He is a warmongering, moralizing fascist (see the PMRC).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lieberman doomed(?)
Posted by: willymack on Jul 31, 2006 12:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was going to make a remark to the effect that: "Lose your popular support? Poll #s sagging? Your cushy job threatened? No sweat-just use the bush boys steal-the-election system! Time tested over 3 "elections" and guarenteed to work! The poor rubes (voters) will never know, or care what hit them"! I was beaten to the punch-not once, but twice, but here it is, anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Elmer Fudd
Posted by: Jameson10314 on Jul 31, 2006 1:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sincerely wish that progressives would not dignify the war wimp from Connecticut by calling him Joe Lieberman rather he is the real live animation of Elmer Fudd. His beloved Israel is in trouble so why is he and slick Willie still here? Clinton said he would die for Israel-well Billy boy now is your chance.

Of course Daffy Duck is none other than the two-faced Al Franken who actually thinks George Bush is a nice man!! Don't be fooled by Air America its a bastion of phony "we support genocide" liberals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MAY LIEBERMAN & THE CLINTONS BE JUST THE FIRST 3
Posted by: krose on Jul 31, 2006 8:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TO LOSE THEIR POWER, OF THE WIMPY, INEFFECTIVE, & ARROGANT "DEMS," WHO HAVE DEFIED OUR WISHES & "LAUGHED IN OUR FACES!"

GOOD-BYE JOE! IT'S BEEN GOOD TO KNOW YA!

WE'LL GET ALONG, SOME HOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Uhm, you mean unlike? Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Uhm, you mean unlike? Posted by: krose
The explanation is in your last sentence
Posted by: baierdoug@hotmail.com on Aug 1, 2006 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"What's so bizarre of course, is that while public sentiment is massively against the war, and that a guy like Lieberman is going down, the antiwar movement doesn't have any form whatsoever".
If you change the word "form" to "forum" you can see why depostition of Lieberman could be the beginning of the "antiwar movements" political emergence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» A Seance for Tricky Dick Posted by: coldeye
what a shocker! The People's Paper?
Posted by: coldeye on Aug 3, 2006 11:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at who the readers and advertisers of the Times are. Only a Ned Lamont could afford the apartments and home advertised in the Times.

Hey. The dems will be looking for a new party chair after November. Dean has pissed off everybody with his big mouth and incompetent management. Who better than Ned Lamont to "grow" the franchise as they say in Old Westbury.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]