Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"My son could no longer be silent while atrocities were committed in the name of democracy."

Posted by Rachel Neumann at 1:29 PM on June 26, 2006.


An open letter from the mother of the first comissioned officer to refuse to serve in Iraq.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

On Friday, the Stryker Brigade was deployed to Iraq. The mother of Ehren Watada, the officer in the brigade who refused to go, sent this letter to explain her son's actions:

Dear Fellow Americans,

I am the mother of Lt. Ehren Watada, an officer stationed at Ft. Lewis. He is part of a Stryker brigade unit that deployed today to Iraq. Despite an unflinching commitment to his men and to democratic ideals, he chose not to accompany his men. His decision came through much soul-searching and through research and consultation with experts across disciplines, inside and outside of the military and the government.

After weighing the evidence, he came to the conclusion that he could no longer be silent while atrocities were committed in the name of democracy. He could no longer be a tool of an administration that used deception and lies to make the case for pre-emptive war.

As a member of the armed forces, sworn to uphold the US Constitution, he refuses to blindly participate in a war of aggression, an illegal war that undermines who we are as a nation and violates international law. Implicit in his oath as an officer is the duty to disobey all unlawful orders for; to carry out these orders renders him an accomplice to a criminal act. Furthermore, to order his men to participate in a war of aggression multiplies his guilt a thousand fold. His conscience will not permit him to do so. He believes that he can best serve them by taking a stand against the war. In so doing, he demonstrates that one does not relinquish the freedom to choose what is right, even in the military, and that the freedom to choose what is right transcends the allegiance to man and institutions.

As a mother, I have evolved from fearing for his safety and for his future to the realization that there is a higher purpose to all that has transpired. My son no longer stands at the crossroads. He has chosen "the road less travelled." Come what may, he is committed to staying the course.

I invite you to affirm your support of Lt. Ehren Watada on June 27th, National Day of Action. On this day, groups across the country will participate in peaceful demonstrations, prayer services, candle light vigils, parades, leafleting, visitations to recruitment stations to provide counsel to prospective recruits.

For updates on news and actions regarding Lt. Watada, please check out: www.thankyoult.org or www.couragetoresist.org.

My deepest thanks,

Carolyn Ho
Ehren's Mom

Digg!

Rachel Neumann is Rights & Liberties Editor at AlterNet.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Son and A Soldier To Be Proud Of
Posted by: badger on Jun 26, 2006 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Ehren's Mom,
thank you and especially your very brave son for upholding far more democratic ideals than blindly obeying a power-greedy ruler!!! Ever since this war has been forced on us, I have despaired for our troops - who swore an oath to uphold and protect the U.S. Constitution and the American people - to see them brainwashed into believing that beating up an impoverished nation somehow equates as freedom and securityfor Americans. I had been at a point to with hold any support for the troops who are being used to protect Bush's oil interests in Iraq instead of we the people here at home. I am very glad for Ehren's courage to do the right thing; he is a soldier I would not hesitate to support, as his decision in fact supports us. For the sake of Americans, I hope many more of our troops remove their blinders and follow Ehren's example of courage.
God bless you both!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your Son is Already a Hero
Posted by: kenadrian on Jun 26, 2006 6:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my books, this young man is a hero - a person of tremendous personal courage who is upholding his duties in a way that many will not immediately understand.

There's no official medal of bravery for his lapel... but he hardly needs one, does he?

Your son has touched the hearts of many Canadians already as we recognize the illegal nature of this war and the shame it brings to your country's leadership. He has ten times more courage than they do (Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfield, Bolton, Wolfowitz, et al).

To speak the truth and to live in truth no matter the personal sacrifice in today's world of spin, deceit, greed, and power lust? To actually be honest?! Now THAT is bravery. That is faith... and eventually the truth will "set him free".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

my thanks to your son!
Posted by: cperry on Jun 27, 2006 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am grateful to your son for his conscientious action. Like yourself and others, I believe that a principled and individual stand against criminal expectations is a far higher morality. His bravery is unquestionable, and many of us recognize it.

Speak out! Democracy is not about defending corporate interests. It is not about our sons and daughters marching forth to return (if they do) forever changed by having participated in a hellish action based on lies, and guaranteed to perpetuate hatred across generations of Iraqi citizens.

I still like this question: what if they gave a war and nobody came?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He is doing his duty
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jun 27, 2006 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your son is no sunshine patriot. His choice of taking this difficult path shows the seriousness of his conviction. As a veteran of 8 years active service during the Cold War, I understand the difficult path he has chosen.

A soldier's loyalty is to the nation-- not a President, a Congress or a flawed policy. A soldier's duty is the defense of the American people-- not wars of aggression, conquest or political expediency. A soldier's responsibility is to serve and act responsibly and honorably, even when the 'official' policy directs otherwise.

Our government has broken faith with the soldiers that serve in our Army. The policy in Iraq was based upon a lie and is against the will of our people. The policy in Iraq is an abuse of a soldier's sense of duty as Iraq posed no serious threat to our national security. Our nation's conduct of the Iraq War is an abuse of American ideals by using torture and other inhumane tactics against prisoners of war.

Your son may suffer on the road he is on, but history will prove him to be right.

"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph."

Thomas Paine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Son sees through it all.
Posted by: symcokid on Jun 27, 2006 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We laud your son for his stand and know there had to have been much Soul searching before reaching his decision. He has insight, compassion and integrity - admirable qualities that are lacking in the Traitors that are leading this country astray!

We need more astute leaders and wish him the very best of what life has to offer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blessings
Posted by: goldennugget on Jun 27, 2006 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blessings on you from the wife of a 30-yr Navy man whose service included aboard ship in Pearl Harbor right thru' to duty in-country VietNam, the other stupid, sinful war we lost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support our troops?
Posted by: joeaddison79 on Jun 27, 2006 10:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I especially liked the following line: "...to carry out these orders renders him an accomplice to a criminal act."

I find it strange that, though most Americans now oppose the war, they continue to call our troops heroes. The reality is that, if this war is indeed a criminal action (as many believe it is), then serving in Iraq, whether as a general or a private, makes you an accomplice to a criminal action.

As far as I'm concerned, the only heroic members of our military are the ones who disobey their orders and refuse to serve in Iraq. All others are either war criminals or pawns, and most are cowards.

E. Joseph Addison

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Support our troops? Posted by: spamcan
He should have known what he was getting into...
Posted by: spamcan on Jun 27, 2006 2:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...before he volunteered in 2003!

A true conscientious objector would object to the war in Afghanistan as well. Mr. Watada doesn't. IMHO, this makes him a political objector who does not honor commitments he makes, dishonors his unit and everyone else in the military, and is more than deserving of a dishonorable discharge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It starts with the few that have enough courage
Posted by: jaredisburning on Jun 29, 2006 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To Carolyn Ho, Ehren's Mom:

I am proud of your son for realizing that he had to stand up for what is right, and not what is acceptable to everyone around him. I have seen so many friends accept the fact that they are suppossed to do what their told, even when they disagree. I used to think the same way until I saw a documentary called why we fight. I can't believe some of the stuff in I didn't know was happening. Through the power of media, and the fact that war is now the main thriving economy, we create enemies, and destroy other nations, all in the name of freedom! We are all sheep. What can we do to stop our own nation? excuse me... empire from doing whatever the hell we want? Who do our "leaders" think they are? The truth is that the USA is behind, or part of almost every war that has happened in the past few decades. Eisenhowers farewell speech about the Military Industrial Complex is flooring. I can't believe that he saw this coming, warned our whole nation, and no one did anything about it. Our leaders are taking advantage of us, by using the media to exploit our feelings of patriotism, and our desire to maintian our freedom. But it has to start with us. It has to start with people like your son standing up and saying I don't believe in this, therefore I won't be part of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Limits on dissent
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Jun 30, 2006 5:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there can be no arguing against Lt. Watada's courage of his convictions, his decision not to deploy was wrong and he should suffer the consequences of his disobedience.

A soldier or member of any of the other armed services cannot choose which war he will or will not fight. If ordered to go, he must. But once in theater, certain actions are out of bounds. For instance, if your superior in the chain-of-command orders you to commit a war crime, such as gunning down unarmed civilians, you have not only the right but also the duty to disobey and to report this illegal order on up the chain of command. That takes a great deal of moral courage, but so does going into harm's way amid a hail of enemy bullets. It hardly seems fair to put either burdon on some of these young kids in uniform. Unfair it may be but there it is nonetheless. All wars are fought mainly by young men barely at the threshold of adulthood.

Some of our citizen soldiers are called upon the display courage in the face of enemy fire. Others are called upon to say "no" in the face of illegal orders in the field. But no member of the armed services has the right to choose which war he will or will not participate in. Our national tradition of civilian control of the military requires that soldiers obey all legal orders. The legality, or not, of this or that particular war is not within the scope of an individual service member's discretion. This is the responsibility of our civilian elected officials and ultimately of the civilian electorate.

It is only the manner in which the war is PROSECUTED that falls within the perview of discretion of the individual in uniform. From the point of view of a soldier, there can BE no "illegal wars." But there most certainly CAN be "illegal orders," such as those that violate the Geneva Convention. Any such orders not only MAY be disobeyed, they MUST be and they must be reported.

TagsNOLA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Limits on dissent Posted by: rg
» RE: Limits on dissent Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: Limits on dissent Posted by: smhawkes