Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

NSA: you might be a terrorist if...

Posted by Deanna Zandt at 8:24 AM on May 29, 2006.


The privacy invasion continues in the AT&T/NSA scandal.
1984cliffsnotes
1984 -- CliffsNotes

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

More from the Life Imitates Art Dept.: Following the lines of last week's FCC refusal to investigate the NSA and AT&T, there's some folks out there filing Freedom of Information Act requests for their phone records to be released -- and being denied, not surprisingly.

Yakov Shafranovich detailed his experience in filing the request and the NSA's response to him; he also provides information on how to file your own request. What did the NSA say to support the denial?

Because of the classified nature of the National Security Agency’s efforts to prevent and protect against terrorist attacks, the fact of whether or not any specific technique or method or activity is employed in that effort is exempt from release pursuant to the exemption provisions of the FOIA.

We can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records responsive to your request. The fact of the existence or non-existence of responsive records is a currently and properly classified matter in accordance with Executive Order 12958, as amended. Thus, your request is denied pursuant to the first exemption of the FOIA, which provides that the FOIA does not apply to matters that are specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign relations and are properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. (emphasis mine)

What's event slightly more insidious is the linked Pittsburgh Indymedia article, where several anti-war groups in Ohio filed FOIA requests to have information gathered about their activites released. What'd they have to say for themselves?

As you know, the President of the United States "authorized the National Security Agency [(NSA)], consistent with U.S. law and the Constitution, to intercept the international communications of people with known links to al Qaeda and related terrorist organizations." The President also noted that, "[t]his is a highly classified program that is crucial to our national security."

Rest assured that safeguards are in place to protect the civil liberties of U.S. citizens. However, because of the highly classified nature of the program, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records responsive to your request. The fact of the existence or non-existence of responsive records is a currently and properly classified matter in accordance with Executive Order 12958, as amended. Thus, your request is denied pursuant to the first exemption of the FOIA, which provides that the FOIA does not apply to matters that are specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive Order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign relations and are properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. (emphasis mine)

Oh yes, I certainly trust that the NSA is keeping my civil liberties close to its heart. Don't you?

Digg!

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is what you get...
Posted by: magistre on May 29, 2006 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when you start believing the lies that Republicans stand for. Remember the good old ones: "Deregulation will make things cheaper", "I am a War President!" and " I am not a crook".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LIBERALS: want to stop terrorism how???
Posted by: jonwilson on May 29, 2006 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand liberals are against the NSA listening in on phone calls to possible foreign terrorists and the analyzing of phone records.

I just want to know what liberals WANT to do to keep us safe from terrorists.

Just give me a list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Also.. ya know... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» And ya know... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
do you expect me to believe
Posted by: popsicle67 on May 31, 2006 12:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you democrats win in 2008 are these things going to stop?
My guess is no. Once a politician has power to do something,
even if he railed against his opponents for using it, he won't give it upso I want every democrat to come out right now and say WE WILL STOP THIS so we can hold their feet to the fire
Jan. 21 2009

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]