Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Could they be that dumb? (number 7,324 in the series)

Posted by Joshua Holland at 11:06 AM on April 27, 2006.


Training the next al Qaeda
muja
nuja

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

I've got a great idea, a real humdinger. Let's arm and train some really radical Islamic militants well versed in the art of terror, and then we can turn them loose on our enemies!

You know, 'cause these things never come back to bite us on the ass.*

Oops, it's looks like the crazies in the Whitehouse and Pentagon beat me to it :

The Pentagon is bypassing official US intelligence channels and turning to a dangerous and unruly cast of characters in order to create strife in Iran in preparation for any possible attack, former and current intelligence officials say.
One of the operational assets being used by the Defense Department is a right-wing terrorist organization known as Mujahedeen-e Khalq (MEK), which is being "run" in two southern regional areas of Iran. […]
One former counterintelligence official, who wished to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the information, describes the Pentagon as pushing MEK shortly after the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The drive to use the insurgent group was said to have been advanced by the Pentagon under the influence of the Vice President's office and opposed by the State Department, National Security Council and then-National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice.
Here's the best part. There's no need to worry about this, because Rummy and Dick Cheney have a plan (and we know how good they are at planning):
According to still another intelligence source, the policy infighting ended last year when Donald Rumsfeld, under pressure from Vice President Cheney, came up with a plan to "convert" the MEK by having them simply quit their organization.
"These guys are nuts," this intelligence source said. "[Undersecretary of Intelligence Stephen] Cambone and those guys made MEK members swear an oath to Democracy and resign from the MEK and then our guys incorporated them into their unit and trained them."
An oath to democracy. Hilarious. Or it would be if it weren't so frightening.

I'm a bit late on this story, and Jan cited a spook saying it was no big deal; it isn't a major operation, just a few "pinpricks." But for me, it's illustrative of a larger point: we never seem to learn from our mistakes. Instead, we bury them in American exceptionalism.

Is it just me, or do you get the feeling the strategic class won't be satisfied until they've set the whole world on fire?

*Most readers are no doubt aware of the assistance we lent the Mujahadeen -- some of whom would become the core of al Qaeda -- in Afghanistan when they were fighting the Russkies, but that article I linked to is about Bosnia. It's worth a read.

Digg!

Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We have to have someone...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Apr 27, 2006 12:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... to be an imaginary threat now that we have destroyed Saddam's Iraq and the Taliban and look to do the same with Iran.

Why does no one in Washington not seem to see that we are, to paraphrase Bowie "Always fighting the same wars"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We have to have someone... Posted by: solarjin
strategic class
Posted by: Jan Frel on Apr 27, 2006 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Is it just me, or do you get the feeling the strategic class won't be satisfied until they've set the whole world on fire?"

Here's something on the strategic class that answers your Q -- "Indeed, every sad word of [David Frum and Richard Perle's book] 'An End to Evil' oozes [their] pained, wasted 60s youths: wasted in yellow sheet stains, wasted studying maps color-coded with spheres-of-influence, wasted memorizing German armaments, and college years wasted playing Risk in their dorms while the socially successful hippies frolicked and fucked all around them. Perle and Frum will never forgive America for this humiliation and therefore they want to egg it on to its suicide by prodding it into a multi-front apocalyptic world war."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No hope for change
Posted by: wetblanket on Apr 27, 2006 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The points made in Joshua's post seem so basic and so obvious to me, that I can't figure out why they're common knowledge at this point. I guess I'm the one that's clueless. I've had countless conversations with conservatives about this (at the dinner table, at parties, etc.) and they never seem to have a good explanation for why we're always supporting leaders and rebels that don't believe our supposedly high-minded ideals (from Iran and Nicaragua to Pakistan and Saudi Arabia).

Pretty hard not become cynical and doubt that any real change in our shortsighted foreign policy will be coming down the pipe anytime soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]