Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Democrats on "Real Security"

Posted by Onnesha Roychoudhuri at 4:49 PM on March 30, 2006.


Real disappointing.
apples_20031205
apples

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

Yesterday, Democrats came out with their "Real Security" [PDF] plan. The "Democratic Plan to Protect America and Restore Our Leadership in the World" is rather nebulous and lofty, and sounds, well, much like our current president's plans. In fact, the Democratic plan sounds even more gung ho about expanding the military:

To Ensure Unparalleled Military Strength and Honor our Troops, we will: Rebuild a state-of-the-art military by making the needed investments in equipment and manpower so that we can project power to protect America wherever and whenever necessary…Double the size of our Special Forces…
Rebuild a state-of-the-art military? Project power? The U.S. spent some $455 billion in 2004 -- accounting for almost half the global figure -- that's more than the combined expenditure of the 32 next most powerful nations. How much more do we really want to spend? And I, for one, would be interested in whether "projecting power" is a handy euphemism for this administration's pre-emptive strike philosophy.

Seems I'm not the only one with concerns that aren't being fielded by either Democrats or Republicans. The "Real Security" plan was released just a day before a Public Agenda foreign policy report. After an extensive survey of Americans' confidence in foreign policy, the report came back with one very clear call from the masses: Please stop "exporting democracy." In fact, the report is subtitled, "Americans Wary of Creating Democracies Abroad."

Of the foreign policy priorities named, repondents put "Actively creating democracies in other countries" last. Americans thought it was more important to help other countries struck by natural disasters, improve the treatment of women, and, get ready…"take into account the views and interests of other countries." A full 73 percent of those polled worry that our actions in the Middle East are aiding the recruitment of terrorists.

Here's the clincher: 65 percent of respondents said that, in the fight against terrorism, there should be more emphasis on diplomatic and economic methods as opposed to the 29 percent that were interested in military efforts. Given this kind of sentiment, Democrats might have worked a little harder at offering something more than a beefed-up piece of Bush administration security-as-big-guns rhetoric. The report does touch on decreasing dependency on foreign energy, inspecting cargo containers, and implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 commission, but there was a missed opportunity here in reframing what security really means to Americans.

Digg!

Onnesha Roychoudhuri is an assistant editor at AlterNet.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
...but is it news to you?
Posted by: Spot on Mar 31, 2006 4:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
perhaps it's time to roll up the sleeves and take a look at what's in the sink. the democrats are simply not interested in being an alternative to the republican agenda. it's about time we came to grips with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Profit Margins
Posted by: AlanSmithee on Mar 31, 2006 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Expecting anything different from the donks is Panglossian bordering on the surreal. Both parties have their coffers filled with oodles of cash be the same corporations that propell their identical foreign policies.

But don't let that stop you from voting for Hillary in '08.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More of the same
Posted by: antoniomo on Mar 31, 2006 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess I'll still vote for a Democrat, but only when I've got just two choices. It seems pretty amazing to me that with so much waste and tragedy in this "war on terrorism" the Democrats still can't (or don't see a need to?) put an entirely different perspective on things. Like developing alternative energy, decreasing our military budget, developing alternative energy, doing something about health care, developing alternative energy.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It'd be relatively easy to come up with meaningful alternatives.
Posted by: wli on Apr 3, 2006 3:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Insert standard diatribe about the Demoblican/Republicratic good cop vs. bad cop game.

You could, for instance, go with "it's the economy, stupid!" Hence, a "Contract with America" -like platform such as:

1. Get the Hell out of Iraq and Afghanistan.
2. Slash military budgets to $150 bln/yr. or thereabouts, which military planners recommend anyway.
3. Eliminate regressive taxes (e.g. sales).
4. Raise taxes on the rich, focusing on aligning higher tax brackets with higher income percentiles, possibly using smooth curves like (1+tanh(a*x))/2 etc.
5. Tax capital gains like ordinary income.
6. Eliminate corporate welfare, possibly even criminalizing it.
7. Nationalize healthcare and extract monopsony bargaining power.
8. Levy Tobin taxes to discourage capital flight.
9. Tax foreign labor to eliminate foreign wage differentials' impacts on domestic job markets.
10. Jack up automotive fuel efficiency standards to eliminate foreign fuel dependence (rumor has it that this alone could eliminate all need for imported oil).
11. Send everyone to college. It cuts down on labor gluts much in the same way as banning child labor does. It should probably even be compulsory.
12. Welfare free-for-all. This is essentially cost-free(!!!), despite right-wing claims otherwise. Low-income people are just shopping at a generalized company store anyway, so it all goes back to the hands of the rich whence it came anyway.
13. Subsidize nuclear, wind, geothermal, etc. energy to make it happen.
14. Boost water, wood/paper, and other forms of material goods conservation with subsidized recycling programs and durability/reusability incentive structures and PR to reduce trade deficits, or at least get more bang for the buck out of whatever trade deficits remain.
15. Get out of the WTO and just plain refuse to honor the 15-20 year obedience to its dictates or whatever. It's a gross abrogation of national sovereignty and economic suicide anyway.
16. Eliminate offshore tax haven shenanigans and Clearstream/Euroclear/etc. -like untraceable banking loopholes, Citibank be damned. Wipe corporate tax evasion off the map.
17. Break up media monopolies and repeal telecommunications monopoly-enabling laws.
18. Rescind 50 USC 403j(b), which gives the CIA a license to embezzle from the govt. at will.
19. Institute rigorous GAAP across all government agencies to eliminate embezzlement and other corruption.
20. Redirect asset forfeiture proceeds to general tax revenues/proceeds to restore the power of the purse over law enforcement.
21. Repeal laws enabling banks, investment firms, and other such affairs to merge as well as to operate on excessive margins.
22. Repeal Taft-Hartley and other similarly oppressive legislation and enforce existing laws (yes, they exist) against typical union-busting tactics.
23. Prosecute exploitation of illegal immigrants like slavery.
24. Start up a massive language training and foreign exchange program for global competitiveness.
25. Push research in robotics to jack up domestic manufacturing productivity with reduced labor costs.
26. Start massive public transportation/etc. works projects to create blue collar jobs and conserve even more energy.

Of course, none of these things will ever find its way onto a Republicratic or Demoblican Party platform.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]