Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Water, water everywhere

Posted by Rachel Neumann at 2:25 PM on March 17, 2006.


As long as you can afford it.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

The patronizing tone of today's AP article on the world water summit is a bit hard to take: "Water is worth fighting for-- even to the death, activists holding an "alternate" forum outside the world water summit said Friday. That attitude might seem strange in developed countries, where water flows at the touch of a faucet. But it isn't nearly as accessible in the developing world."

There's some big problems with those opening lines. First, it shouldn't be "strange" to any U.S. reader of international news that water is a limited resource. Big dams have displaced hundreds of thousands of people everywhere from India to the Phillipines to Mexico. But second, we have plenty of water problems here in the so-called "developed" world. In fact, the development is a big part of the problem.

One of the dams that's causing the most trouble here in the U.S. is the dam on the Klamath River. The problem is dear to me because I grew up on the Salmon River, a tributary of the Klamath, and the salmon sure don't run there anymore. The Klamath is too shallow and sick now to sustain the fish. For the first time ever, the Department of Fish and Game is considering banning all salmon fishing along a large part of the California and Oregon coasts.

But it's not just the dam that's to blame, it's the Bush administration. In 2002, the Bush administration chose to ignore its own federal biologists and diverted more water from the Klamath River for farm irrigation. As estimated 70,000 fish died of disease and suffocation because of the low water and high temperatures that resulted. According to a 2003 report by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, it was the worst die-off in history on the Klamath, and possibly the entire Pacific Coast.

According to a government press release, the Bush administration is sending the U.S. Undersecretary for Democracy (did you know we had one?) Paula Dobriansky to the world water forum. The press release says that the focus of the meeting is "local action," which the U.S. "strongly supports."

Maybe someone could suggest to Ms. Undersecretary that local action, and equitable water distribution, begins at home.

Digg!

Rachel Neumann is Rights & Liberties Editor at AlterNet.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Next Big Legal Feast for Lawyers
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 17, 2006 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Water systems and water rights are not only being privatized in the 3rd world, they are being privatized in many places throughout the US. This is especially true in small, incorporated communities.

At the same time, our government continues to subsidize irresponsible industrial, residential and agricultural operations and new development throughout our country. A good book for some background is Cadillac Desert by Marc Reisner. A 4-part PBS series of the same name was produced a number of years ago.

The intensive pumping of groundwater under our national breadbasket, the Great Plains, has for many decades exceeded the rate of natural replenishment. Eventually the water will run out and the Plains will return to the steppe it once was. With millions of acres of once productive midwest and eastern farmland covered with strip-malls and subdivisions, where will your wheat, corn, rye, soybeans, and cattle come from?

A century of irrigation in desert areas of the southwest have left massive acreage heavily contaminated with mineral salts, rendering them either economically unviable or marginal for long-term use. Colorado River water is so salty by the time it nears Mexico that the US has a desalinization plant just to reduce levels to that guaranteed by treaties with Mexico.

Unplanned and unwise sprawl has left easterners, who have long taken abundant water for granted, looking for more water. Metro Atlanta is now facing real curbs on growth due to the lack of water. More cities will be facing this prospect in the near future.

Given all of this, our government still sells water to agribusiness below cost, subsidizing the growing of Cotton and other water intensive crops in the desert even as it pays farmers in the southeast not to grow it. Politics and money have warped our water policy for longer than anyone reading this has been alive and it's time for an overhaul.

If I were a young Law Student today, resource and environmental law is exactly where I would want to be. In a decade it will be a no-brainer. You will have more work than you can possibly handle and not just in the west.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey Rachel
Posted by: famouspipeliner on Mar 17, 2006 11:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're going to have to end your stories with an id pro quo. Why back off? Conclude with your sharpest edge. Yes, I am drunk and stoned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

god help us
Posted by: www.wreckedband.com on Mar 18, 2006 9:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IN 1981 the united nations put out a book detailing the palestine rights ..a historical perspective...AL franken ....soros,...dems have you read it ....in a hospitol in lies israel a cold blooder killer .....well hamas cold blooded killers? ...mosha dyane ...killer? .....saul....killer........when your child ...i just got a call from my great friend mr.levy ...we talked for an hour about this comment ...did we agree ..on some ...hes still my great friend ...so i asked him were his parents were born ,,he said romaina ...i said well you a romainian and your religen is jew....just like a catihic who is irish and their religion is cathlic ,well ..did he go off for half an hour ...i sail their has never been a country called jewland ...israel is country like the us ...people from all over ...sure a lot of jews ...but also many other religinns.....ok thats it ill stop so you folks can comment..then ill get back on....by the way were are the rario hosts ....are they above their own blogs .....oh please have their driver...turn aroun and rebuke them ....richard hydell and wrecked www.wreckedband.com by richard hydell at March 14, 2006 - 10:54am | edit | reply | email this comment

by richard hydell at March 14, 2006 - 11:16am | edit | reply | email this comment
by richard hydell at March 13, 2006 - 9:45pm
Is there some reason I'm not seeing to make people scroll this twice?

by frazzled at March 14, 2006 - 1:09am | reply | email this comment
god help us ..as we sleep ...
You want to see how far corporations will go if we let them in this country? Look at the history of World War II, where going into World War II, General Motors and Dupont still had commercial deals and relationships with the giant German chemical company I.G.Farber, and with the Kruppworks and with the Nazi regime that was so intertwined with them. And there's plenty of documentation on that and even more coming out shortly in a major book on the subject.
If you want to see how they behave, go to Indonesia and see the Nike shoe subcontracted companies where for a $1.80 -- used to be $1.67 -- $1.80 a day, not a living wage, women are manufacturing Nike shoes. And they manufactured 19 million pairs in 1993 and all of their pay together, of all the women who manufactured all the shoes was less than what the chief executive officer of the Nike Corporation got that year

by richard hydell at March 14, 2006 - 12:11am | edit | reply | email this comment
the humans

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]