Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The not-so-secret CIA

Posted by Onnesha Roychoudhuri at 10:54 AM on March 13, 2006.


Chicago Tribune introduces the security agency to that new-fangled contraption: the internet.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

Yesterday, the Chicago Tribune published a story with the headline "Internet Blows CIA Cover." Writer John Crewdson didn't need to leave the confines of his cubicle for his investigation finding that a simple online search yielded "a virtual directory of more than 2,600 CIA employees, 50 internal agency phone numbers and the locations of some two dozen secret CIA facilities around the United States."

The article opens with, "She is 52 years old, married, grew up in the Kansas City suburbs and now lives in Virginia, in a new three-bedroom house." That would be the description of a covert CIA operative. Kindly, the Tribune agreed not to publish the less-than-inside info they discovered.

The CIA's response? "Cover is a complex issue that is more complex in the internet age. There are things that worked previously that no longer worked."

Yes, well, and apples are a kind of fruit.

Of course it's more complex. What's disturbing is that the CIA seems to just now be realizing this basic premise at a time when we are facing, according to this administration, unprecedented terrorist threats. And yet, when confronted with the Tribune's revelations, senior U.S. officials are saying things like this: "I don't know whether Al Qaeda could do this, but the Chinese could."

Forget the ethnicity, affiliation, or country of origin -- a seven year old could do this. It just begs the question -- if our security is in the hands of these people, how safe could we really be? President Bush, in his defense of the secretive nature of the NSA wiretaps, has repeatedly implied that riding roughshod over Congress and the law was necessary to keep al Qaeda from finding out that the NSA is listening in on phone calls. For those with functioning minds (come on…the NSA is known as "the big ear") this simply makes no sense. But we see this naivete (purposeful or not) rearing its ugly head again.

So how are our security agencies plugging critical intelligence and security gaps? Just this past week, a professor at Pomona College in Southern California was allegedly questioned by FBI anti-terrorism officials on the status of the Venezuelan community in the U.S. Tinker Salas, a professor of Latin American history told the AP that "the detectives' line of questioning focused on publicly available information such as where he went to school and whether there was a Venezuelan consulate in Los Angeles."

Can't you just see a FBI official, face set in a skeptical sneer, ignoring office hours and barging in on the professor. Asking, pen and pad in hand, Mr. Salas, how about you explain this whole "history" thing to us.

Digg!

Onnesha Roychoudhuri is an editorial fellow at AlterNet.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Be still and hold your breath
Posted by: AlienSlave on Mar 13, 2006 3:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s just astounding how many times every level of law enforcement information is compromised. Every day someone exposes the inept security at some level and it just continues to be ignored. Most of the compromised data bases are accidentally accessed. What does that say for intentional professional hacking attempts. A recent and common example is of a person trying to get their new laptop wireless internet connection. They inadvertently connected to the computer inside of a parked police car. This then is connected to a FBI data base. If it happens to you just turn off the connection and say nothing. To do so will not result in better security policies being put into place, you will be investigated instead. So much for being a good patriot.
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dunce caps
Posted by: rsaxto on Mar 14, 2006 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You might as well put dunce caps on all USA agents of whatever agency for their security protocols are quite bizzare and in the end flimsy as cotton candy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Citizen Observer
Posted by: lindavanballen on Mar 14, 2006 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, okay, we now know that the CIA is not the covert organization we've been brainwashed it was. So with this in mind, why has our Congress once again passed the so called Patriot Act? Do we really think transgressions against our civil liberties is going to increase national security? I am a patriot; I am not at war. I believe in the US Constitution, separation of powers, and the Bill of Rights. Think about who are the transgressors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]