Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Emergency contraception heads to the states

Posted by Deanna Zandt at 8:36 AM on February 24, 2006.


The FDA is ignoring it, but state legislatures aren't.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

With the FDA dragging its feet for almost five years on making emergency contraception available over the counter, many states are taking matters into their own hands -- for better or worse. The Baltimore Sun reports:

Under the proposed Maryland law, pharmacists who volunteer to receive special training may dispense the pills. The law does not require all pharmacists to furnish the pills, and the State Board of Pharmacy estimated 5 percent of Maryland's 5,331 licensed pharmacists would initially participate.

Legislation in other states would allow pharmacists to provide Plan B directly to women under an agreement with a doctor giving the pharmacist blanket permission to sell the drug or require emergency rooms to provide it to rape victims, said Elizabeth Nash, a public policy associate at the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion-rights group that is tracking the efforts.

On the other side of the debate are laws allowing pharmacists to refuse to fill prescriptions based on their beliefs:

Abortion opponents are fighting the efforts of Plan B supporters by proposing measures in Illinois, Michigan and 13 other states that would permit pharmacists to refuse to fill a prescription because it violates their beliefs. Four states - Arkansas, Georgia, Mississippi and South Dakota - already have such laws on the books.

The messed up thing here is that Plan B is tied to abortion. It's not an abortion pill, a la RU-486 -- it's a medication that prevents conception, just like the regular Pill, only in higher doses. For more insight on what fundamentalist pharmacists are thinking, check out this must-see interview on the Daily Show (click on "Pill of Rights"), with its frighteningly true quote: "The question remains, who will control a woman's body - the governor or her pharmacist?"

UPDATE: Center for Policy Alternatives policy director Bernie Horn writes in:

Just FYI, when you are talking about progressive legislation in the states, you may want to look at our website, www.stateaction.org, as a resource. We’re the folks who coordinate a Progressive Agenda across the fifty states.

The legislators who push for "collaborative practice" in emergency contraception, as well as emergency contraception for sexual assault victims, are generally part of our State Action Network.

Digg!

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
contraception or conception?
Posted by: bluemeadow on Feb 24, 2006 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It's not an abortion pill, a la RU-486 -- it's a medication that prevents contraception"

ummmm, don't you mean it prevents conception?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: contraception or conception? Posted by: Deanna Zandt
They Should Have it Without a Perscription.
Posted by: Super-Saiyan on Feb 24, 2006 9:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Honestly, the FDA keeps dragging it's feet. Even the FDA defines the start of pregnancy as when a fertilized egg is implanted into the uterus, not before then! The EC pill won't work if a fertilized egg is already implanted anyway. The FDA is just bowing to political pressure and being rather spineless. I hope my state (Arizona) will legalize it without a perscription, but there's to many conservatives here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]