Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

On 'women bloggers'

Posted by Deanna Zandt at 8:06 AM on November 15, 2005.


Is blogging as an occupation, by default, male?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Start Making Sense in your
mailbox!

 

There's an article up on SadieMag about women's participation in the wonderful world of blogging. As Amanda Marcotte points out, it's great that the question seems to have finally shifted away from "Where are the women bloggers?" to "What are women writers blogging about?" The article goes on to interview several mostly political blogging women, from both the right and left, and questions the effect of one's gender when writing online.

Not surprisingly, it's still a man's world, but that's not the point I want to address. It's the frame of "women bloggers." By addressing the issue in this way, we've already set the frame up so that the default "blogger" by itself is male, and adding a parameter -- "women" or "female" -- is necessary to feminize this default setting for the word.

It's like when people use "male nurse." The default state is feminine, and the "male" is added to masculinize it. Actually, it seems that, according to my spell-checker, "masculinize" isn't even a word... but "feminize" is. Why? I'm guessing that most words in our heads are already clearly masculine, and we've got a lot more feminizing to do than we realize.

I'm thus putting out a call to bloggers (and readers of blogs) everywhere to help make sure that this word gets firmly established as a gender-neutral, happily androgynous occupation. Stop using those pesky gender-qualifiers today.

Digg!

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet, and manages Start Making Sense.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Let's make gender irrelevant
Posted by: mrschmidt47 on Nov 15, 2005 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reminds me of the New Yorker cartoon, "Nobody knows you're a dog on the Internet." And so it goes with blogging as well - it's by nature gender-neutral - anybody can get involved. So, if you're a woman and want to say something, get busy, and don't allow yourself to get distracted by debates about male versus female blogging.

In addition to my own business blog, Mary's Blog, I routinely participate in "male blogs" such as that of Tom Peters. Sure, sometimes I'm the only (apparent) female participating but I'm there and nobody tells me to go away because I'm a woman.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The fun thing about the internet
Posted by: bettsoff on Nov 15, 2005 12:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can be anybody you want. People will almost assume you're male if you don't explicitly correct them. It's an interesting social experiment to run two screen names on the same site, both expressing the same opinions, one where you reveal yourself immediately as female and the other where you don't and let people assume what they wish. See if your personas or their opinions are treated differently by the others on the site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Point!
Posted by: echidne on Nov 15, 2005 2:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From now on I will only talk about men bloggers when I comment on something the guys said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: sui_generis on Dec 1, 2005 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I always hope that when I go to the hospital, that I get a "Doctress" -- they're hot!

; )


I've found that for most of my blogging, people didn't know whether I was male or female unless I strayed into the topic of online dating.

As a guy, I consider that a compliment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But many "Women bloggers" blog about being women?
Posted by: tiffanybrown76 on Dec 9, 2005 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think "women blogger" or "gay blogger" or "black blogger" is appropriate when the blogger in question deliberately uses their identity to inform their blogging.

In other words, to call me a "black woman blogger" is completely appropriate because I blog about race and gender from a black woman's perspective and about being a black woman. Min Jung Kim, on the other hand, is a blogger/diarist, although she sometimes writes about being the daughter of immigrants and life as an Asian American.

I have yet to see a blogger who blogs about being a man in the same way. So perhaps thinking of "women bloggers" as a subgenre of the "identity blogging" genre would help?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]