Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Democratic Party's indefensible position on Iraq

Posted by Cenk Uygur at 8:42 AM on October 26, 2005.


How to remain a permanent minority.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

The Democrats are unbelievable. They give us almost no reason for hope. Just when you think they might have figured out how to fight back against the Bush administration, they pull the rug out from underneath themselves -- again. My God, how simple is it to say the Iraq War was a mistake and we should have never invaded in the first place?

But they inexplicably refuse to do this most obvious first step.

From this week on Meet the Press:

TIM RUSSERT: Based on what you now know today, do you regret having voted for the war?

SEN. SCHUMER: Well, no, Tim, because my vote was seen and I still see it as a need to say we must fight a strong and active war on terror.

Are you kidding me? Tying in the original invasion of Iraq with the fight against terrorism and al-Qaeda? Does this guy work for the Bush administration? It's impossible to be more wrong and more spineless.

Democrats blame the Bush administration for misleading the country into war, and then when given the opportunity to say they would have done otherwise, they refuse. They say they would have done the same thing.

I'm trying to not get angry, but this is as frustrating as it gets. Is there no one who will speak up for us? Is there no one who will speak reason in this country? These sadly misguided Democrats think they're being "strong" by saying they would still have authorized the invasion of Iraq knowing what they know now. In fact, they're being painfully weak. No one would mistake their vacillating position for strength.

Strength is having the courage of your convictions. And fighting for what you believe.

If the Democratic establishment actually believes the war was still a good idea, then I don't want anything to do with them. If they think it was a bad idea, but they are trying to score political points by pretending to be in favor of it, then I don't want anything to do with them.

Didn't they already lose an election with this strategy?

Other than being cowardly, this stance is also politically ineffectual. John Kerry already tried to prove how tough he was by saying he supported the Iraq War. It didn't work. People called him a flip-flopper for criticizing the President while agreeing with him at the same time. They were right.

"The Iraq war was a terrible idea and I completely agree with it" is an unprincipled stand that cannot be defended. It's so simple to say you were misled by the administration and that you would never trust them to make this type of decision again.

It looks like Patrick Fitzgerald is going to make your case so much easier by uncovering some of the lies that led us into the war. For the love of God, just say you were lied to and that you would never make the same mistake if you had to do it over.

Democrats criticize the President for never owning up to his mistakes, but yet, they're doing the same exact thing. And the mistake they would have to admit to here is "trusting this administration." So simple. If they can't get this right this late in the game, are they ever going to be able to get anything right?

I don't want to nitpick every Senator on every issue. I am not the type to abandon someone because they disagree with me on a couple of things. You will never find a politician you completely agree with. But the Iraq War is not a minor issue. It is the largest and most important issue. When the Democratic establishment supports George Bush's logic in taking us into this war and agrees with him on the original invasion, they make it impossible to support them.

I know this is not the position of every elected Democratic official. However, it is the position of the most influential and powerful Democratic leaders in the country, including Senators Schumer, Clinton, Kerry and Biden. This is not a small fringe group within the party, this is the party establishment.

Since the Republicans seem to be irredeemably lost on this issue, the Democratic Party is our last shred of hope. I hesitate in using harsh language against them, but they leave us no choice. I hope they can prove me wrong and show the American people they do have the courage to stand up and fight for the majority of Americans who now believe the Iraq War was a mistake. If they can't do that, they leave us with no one to root for, no hope for a better direction and no faith left in the system.

Digg!


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Um...DUH!
Posted by: Newtopia on Oct 26, 2005 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's more pathetic: the fact that you are still outraged by the pro-war, pro-corporate Democrats who have not had our interests at heart for decades, or the fact that you waste column space whining about it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Um...DUH! Posted by: Evan Derkacz
Well, what are we going to do about it?
Posted by: turil on Oct 27, 2005 5:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This really is very, very old news to many of us. Maybe it's simply getting mainstream attention, and on more people's radar now.

Anyway, welcome to enlightenment!

Now what?

I see two main solutions.

1. An all out campaign to put the Green Party (or some new party, I suppose) into the mainstream, while fully abandoning the Dems. I'm not talking about a third party, I'm talking about the Greens being the new Democratic Party. This solution will only work if there is a serious grassroots campaign to win over the hearts and minds of Mainstream America with a bold, clear statement about what the party stands for, along with a few key politicians switching parties. To make this work, we'd need to start with the 2006 midterm elections, and get some momentum going before the big test of the presidential election. It may seem farfetched, but it's doable, especially given the US public's penchant for embracing "fads" at the drop of a hat.

2. Reform the Democratic party. Fire the lot of them, except for the few courageous souls who speak up for themselves and aren't owned by corporate money. Encourage, and fully prepare, heretofor unknowns to run for all pubic seats, and take over the electoral college, and the DNC. Find people with convictions who have a collaborative spirit and can think on their feet, and train them to be great representatives of the people. Run elections like you'd run a job interview, and seriously pick the best candidate for the job, not the "lesser of two evils". If the available candidates don't meet our needs, find better ones ASAP.

Above all, if we find that an elected official, or candidate, is either beholden to big business, or has a competitive "us against them" attitude, get rid of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well, what are we going to do about it? Posted by: bansidh@citlink.net