Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why isn't this the biggest news story of the day?

Posted by Cenk Uygur at 4:59 AM on October 21, 2005.


A former official confirms what we always knew about Bush and his administration.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

[For more on the Wilkerson speech, go HERE]

Read this article in the Washington Post about Colin Powell's former right-hand man, Colonel Larry Wilkerson. And then explain to me why this isn't huge news. Granted, Colonel Wilkerson explains what we have always suspected. But when a top former Bush administration official comes out and says the White House has been taken over by a cabal and that George Bush is overmatched for his position, I would say that qualifies as headline news.

I want to make a quick plug for print journalists here. I often lambaste the mainstream media for doing a poor job of covering this administration. No, that's not fair, poor isn't a strong enough word -- a terrible job. But it's important to give credit where credit is due. If it weren't for the print journalists in this country, we would have never found out about half of the outrages that have gone inside this White House.

They have had their down moments, to say the least. Judy Miller's pre-war coverage was disastrous. And before I've even gone after Dana Milbank, who wrote this piece, on his condescending coverage of Rep. John Conyers. But all that being said, next to television news, print journalists are the gold standard. They might not give the stories the headlines they deserve, they might not press on as much as they should on certain stories, but if it wasn't for them, we would never even find out about most of these stories.

I shudder to think what this country would do if we had to rely on television news.

This article and another one in the Washington Post today shows there are still men of courage left in this world. We have to highlight Colonel Wilkerson's words because he proves it is much more important to be loyal to your country, rather than your party. He cares about this country. He thinks it's headed in the wrong direction and it's about time we listened to smart people warning us to change direction.

Digg!

Cenk Uygur is co-host of The Young Turks, the first liberal radio show to air nationwide.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why Wilkerson revelations not news?
Posted by: sausage on Oct 21, 2005 6:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To answer that let me link you to Robert Perry's excellent Web site Consortiumnews.com. According to Perry, collusion between the White House and the MSM started during the Reagan administration when the Iran-Contra scandal started hinting at presidential involvement

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can't agree more
Posted by: katyaa on Oct 21, 2005 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is my contention that we are not involved in Iraq for any reason so much as to cover the tracks of previous administrations. Given the fact that we supplied Saddam with weaponry to use against Iran we knew full well what weaponry he possessed. I believe it was information more than WMD this administration was after. Judging from events immediately following our invasion - the rampant "looting" of Iraq's national archives, museums, etc. I would tend to believe they have succeeded in destruction of the evidence. That the media remains ever silent speaks volumes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How much ineptitude, how much collusion...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 23, 2005 12:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how much fear of reprisal against their corporate parents...

Who knows what are the causes, but we know the effect.

We're in a war based on lies and a startlingly incompetent man is president.

Our 4th estate watchdog is a toothless hound scratching at fleas like Aurba girl, the Michael Jackson trial and whatever the hell Paris Hilton is doing.

It's sad, really.

New on EWM: The Twelve Days of Miers: An inappropriately early holiday motif song parody/commentary.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Decides What is Headlines?
Posted by: aonghus36 on Oct 23, 2005 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It certainly isn't the reporter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]