Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Starbucks tipping point

Posted by Deanna Zandt at 7:17 AM on August 8, 2005.


The Lower East Side gets its taste of homogeny, and I'm not going to hold my tongue.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get The Mix in your
mailbox!

 

And now, a short break from our regularly scheduled national politics...

I found out Friday through some local gossip rags -- Gawker and Curbed -- that the fourth horseman of the Apocolypse is riding into the Lower East Side of Manhattan (that'd be my neighborhood): Starbucks is coming.

There have been rumors since I moved to the neighborhood four years ago, every time another vacant lot opened up, every time another construction site went down. When Collective Unconscious, an indie/underground performance space, and Barramundi, a neighborhood-friendly bar, lost their leases to make way for a new high-rise development on Ludlow Street, locals made their fears known by spraypainting the former signs to read "The Gap" and "Starbucks." Most of us never thought it would really happen, though. The nearest Starbucks is a cluster phenomenon on Astor Place in the East Village, where one can stand and see three within eye shot. New Yorkers are resilient, though -- the infamous Mud Truck set up shop in between them.

Panic set in when I found out about the monstrosity at Allen and Delancey. Some may chalk this up to histronics and hysterics, but let me explain. New York City, since the early '90s, is slowly being turned into a shopping mall. Soho, once well-known for its galleries and interesting art spaces, is nothing but Bloomingdales (!) and Old Navy. At least three new megaplexes have opened, and there's of course the Disneyfication of 42nd Street. People like Reverend Billy have been crying out for years, sure. But the steamrollers have moved on, and now it's not just Manhattan, with its expanding universities and strip malls, but even the safe-haven of Brooklyn is under attack as well.

The Lower East Side has been gentrifying for at least the last ten years, but there is something particularly sinister about gentrification happening here. Most people don't know that the LES is the home of many radical political movements and events -- labor riots of the early 1900s, Jewish indie publishing, the Tompkins Square riots of the early 1990s, squatter's rights, popular higher education, the Beats, American punk rock, and environmentalism all found a place in the heart of this neighborhood, just to name a few. (For more radical history, check out Bruce Kayton's Radical Walking Tours. Here's some highlights.) The LES has been a safe haven for anyone outside the mainstream -- not rich, not yuppie, not white, not straight, not capitalist, whathaveyou -- since its inception, and it's why I moved here. Longtime neighborhood residents are proud of the history, and it's now celebrated (as it disappears) at the annual Howl Festival, itself a source of contention for many, but I think it does a good job of covering the ground.

So, back to Starbucks and why it's a devastating blow for the LES, and what we're doing about it. I've been working with a number of local organizations to address the serious problem of hyperdevelopment here; not only are the people being removed, but the physical character of the neighborhood is being destroyed. Just Saturday night, I wandered over to my former place of employment for a show to discover that one of the last holdouts against a new development had finally been demolished. Erased. Cease to exist. We've been working on campaigns and joining forces with other struggles against hyperdevelopment to address zoning, the City Council selling out the residents, etc. So far, load of energy has poured in -- I never thought I'd see the day where radicals from the Tompkins Square riots would be hosting zoning forums, but it's important and it's actually happening. L.O.C.O. has been battling the violations on Orchard and Ludlow. P.S. 64 is being saved, and folks are fighting for St. Brigid's Church. The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation is stepping into the fray. It's mind-blowing!

Starbucks is the urban Wal-Mart, and is a powerfully nasty symbol and metaphor for the homogenization of America. To have it arrive at the home of counterculture is just plain unacceptable. I can't stand the thought of losing Guss' Pickles, or the Santo Domingo Bakery, or having to pay for wifi access because the Lotus Lounge closed up shop.

So, I sat down today to start a new campaign. I'm going to help people make a better coffee decision when it opens in four weeks -- I'm going to stand outside every day and hand out cards that I'm printing up:

  

(click images for larger view; download a hi-res PDF here to print your own)

The fact that there's ten other places to get coffee signals to me that there's no demand for Starbucks here, ya know? And I left some places out -- these are just my own personal favorites. I plan on being there pretty often, and I'm taking offers for shifts if anyone's around and interested. Plus, some folks from the cultural production company I belong to are working on a flashy dispenser for cards when we're not there.

Bottom line is, regardless of what happens next, I still refuse to take this lying down. Where will the people go, if New York really does become the whitewashed upscale utopia -- all the comforts of home included! -- that the developers imagine it to be? What will happen to the unique perspective on history from the Lower East Side? What will the poor folks do if affordable housing becomes a distant memory of better days? Where will artists find cheap spaces to live and create? The social misfits, the political radicals, the indvidualists, where will they call home? They won't come to NYC anymore, not if it looks just like where they came from.

Above the entrance to the Bowery Poetry Club, it says in enormous letters: "EVERYTHING IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE." Believe me, this isn't just a reference to the madcap schedule the Club maintains. If this island is going to keep changing, I'm going to keep working on making sure that it retains some semblance of history, and that there's a place for all the freaks, geeks and otherwise unfit-for-homogeny. Who's with me?

UPDATE: What with the ensuing squawk storm that happened below and elsewhere, I've posted a reply over on my neighborhood news blog, LES Bridge Mix. Feel free to comment below or over there...

Digg!

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet, and manages Start Making Sense.


On the religious right 'nuts,' liberals, and catching a break
A response to a colleague...
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 17, 2006.
Bush thinking of 'replacing' Iraqi government? [VIDEO]
A whole new definition of Democracy.
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.
Religious right rally's first gaffe
Church opposes bigoted agenda
Post by Evan Derkacz. October 16, 2006.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
All the comforts of home indeed
Posted by: bettsoff on Aug 8, 2005 8:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The same thing happened to camping in the early 90s. I grew up in a world where car camping still meant roughing it, washing your hair in a bucket, and reading in your sleeping bag with a flashlight. I woke up one morning and stepped out of the popup and found myself beseiged with monstrous, ugly, wasteful Recreational Vehicles (they can't in good conscience call them campers anymore) that have DVD players and hot water showers and air conditioning. Starbucks is the same thing--selling 'bigger and better' where the original is purer pleasure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All the comforts of home indeed Posted by: Deanna Zandt
Starbuck's Paradox
Posted by: timothylennon on Aug 8, 2005 10:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Seattle. Despite the fact that this city created the monster, let me assure you that Starbucks is more vilified here than just about everywhere else. There is a strong independent streak here in the Northwest that equates anything corporate with evil. Pure evil. For a long time, I held the same view of Starbucks as this author and supporters of the local everywhere, but this article in Colorlines magazine really shook me:

http://www.arc.org/C_Lines/CLArchive/story7_1_02.html

I'm not saying that the Lower East Side or anyone else should embrace Starbucks. However, this article's perspective taught me some things about the company that made it a lot harder for me to hate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Starbuck's Paradox Posted by: Deanna Zandt
The Urban Walmart?!?!
Posted by: ladyloo on Aug 8, 2005 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Uh, Starbucks is many things good and bad, but it is certainly NOT the "urban Walmart", as tidy a metaphor as that would seem. Walmart is notorious for union busting (they were forced to unionize in Canada so they closed the stores), exploiting undocumented workers, bucking nearly all labor laws, and is currently the subject of a class action suit led by 1.6 million former employees stating they systematically denied raises and promotions to women and paid them less than their male counterparts. STARBUCKS, on the other hand, has been historically diverse in gender and ethnicity from the baristas to the executives, provides full benefits to part-time workers, and (though my best friend quit last year so i dont know if they still do this) as of last year they were still providing their workers with stock - she netted 5 grand worth. Maybe LES hipsters don't have families and thus don't care about matching 401k packages, but I'm just saying that while you can say plenty of bad things about Starbucks irritating ubiquity, Walmart they are not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh my God, get over it
Posted by: Gregoire on Aug 8, 2005 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Far more prevalent are the forty-six Dunkin Donuts currently festering throughout the East Village and Lower East side. They are far more tacky and horrific than Starbucks ever was. (Of course, yes, their coffee tastes better than that burnt mud that Starbucks schleps, but that's another story.) It is unlikely that what Starbucks does to ruin other parts of the city (situates several stores within a small location) will happen down here, because other corporate places have already done the job for them.

You're angry at Starbuck's symbolic value more than the Starbucks itself. But everything negative that Starbucks stands for is already happening in the Lower East Side. This seems to me to be a very quixotic crusade of yours.

Although I'm glad you put a list of alternatives, most of which I frequent and do not plan to leave once Starbucks opens its doors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh my God, get over it Posted by: Deanna Zandt
» RE: Oh my God, get over it Posted by: aonghus36
ha ha, take that
Posted by: mzing12 on Aug 8, 2005 3:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you think some business in some building is going to change your life, you have some strange priorities. Let me guess: do you care about what music someone listens to, and what clothes someone wears, too, huh?

Life is life, and if some store opening up can get you this bent out of shape, be lucky that you're so privileged. All you NYC kids are like that these days: that's why no self-respecting artist or writer would ever, or could ever, live in New York these days.

Money and an apartment can't buy a personality, only an image - is that why Starbucks is so upsetting?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Starbucks and Wal-Mart
Posted by: pomes on Aug 8, 2005 4:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand why people can't stand Wal-Mart. I dislike Wal-Mart itself, not because it's a "symbol for the homogenization of America" but because they are atrocious to their employees, bully their suppliers, rely on basically slave labor overseas, etc.

Starbucks, on the other hand, doesn't seem to suffer from any of this. If they treat their employees horribly, I've never seen or read about it. If they're driving local coffee shops out of business, it's because (at least here in rural Northern California) local places charge too much and are open too few hours. Sounds more like good old-fashioned competition to me. Besides aversion to a corporate logo, what is the real reason we should all be battling against Starbucks? Not saying there isn't one, I've just never heard anyone offer it.

This is all moot to me, since I don't drink coffee and don't plan on stopping.. As a passionate anti Wal-Marter, I'm curious.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Starbucks and Wal-Mart Posted by: Deanna Zandt
one more downtown coffee option
Posted by: housingworks on Aug 8, 2005 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another option for coffee in downtown Manhattan is Housing Works Used Book Cafe on Crosby between Houston and Prince--not too far from the LES, and right off the commercial strip that is lower Broadway.

The coffee at Housing Works is fair trade (and really, that's my one complaint about Starbucks--it certainly wouldn't cost them much to have fair trade blends), the setting for drinking it is one of the best (totally biased opinion here) used bookstores in New York, and all of the proceeds from the cafe and bookstore go toward helping homeless New Yorkers with HIV/AIDS. See the Housing Works website for more information about the cafe and the cause.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: one more downtown coffee option Posted by: Deanna Zandt
Sad... going on forever just not so fast
Posted by: ogma on Aug 8, 2005 5:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Homogenzation of the EV and LES really started the big time corporate roll back when The Gap took over the late great movie theatre on St. Mark's and Second. Next thing Giuliani got rid of sqeegee men and industrial zoning and the malling of Soho began. Used to be this was a freaky sometimes scary place for a strange tribe. The look and feel has been co-opted by MTV, Madison Avenue and marketers everywhere. Time to face the fact we are no longer a neighborhood but a destination (to steal iblogny's tag line.) Ironically what made it great can't afford to be here anymore. The "new" is striving to be hip, an oh so boring and often expensive pale imitation of the original. Happened to the West Village and in Paris, Berlin, Prague and every little cheap backwater that creative types made safe for the masses... Unfortunately now they grow up with it on tv and wreak it all the faster...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NYC as Dodo Bird
Posted by: BernieMooney on Aug 8, 2005 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I'd like to thank ogma for the plug for my blog, but I have to disagree when it started. I think it started when the first ATM appeared on Avenue A. But I guess we all have our own idea of when it began.

That said, I feel more sadness than outrage. NYC is ceasing to be NYC. For the past 25 years I have watched not just the East Village and Lower East Side, but all of Manhattan become more and more like "America." As I wrote on my blog back in March, "It’s been said that New York reinvents itself every 20 years. I’ve found this to be true, but it used to be that New York reinvented itself within the context of itself. It is now changing in the context of the rest of the country. It is ceasing to be an original."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's because of YOU!!!
Posted by: warhol1 on Aug 8, 2005 10:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The lower east side is changing because people like yourself move there. The typical "white" hipsters who want to be cool because of shit done years and years and years ago, move to these neighborhoods and complain that the "mainstream" is taking over. PLEASE! It's already been done. Ask the latino population that had to check out. Your ego and your selfishness are soooo annoying. BE FUCKING ORIGINAL! Go someplace that needs some rebellious attitudes! How about Pittsburgh, or Cleveland, or Buffalo. Your rent is cheap...you can find expansive empty warehouse loft-livin just waiting for an artist to take over.......old people to piss off with your "new" fo-hawk, and neighborhoods still gritty enough to give the thrill of living such a fabulous bohemian lifestyle. If that doesn't work....move to the south bronx, then we'll see how tough you really are. In fact, last time i checked...the artist are already checkin out there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah... about Starbucks and Urban Blight.
Posted by: JeremyB982 on Aug 9, 2005 12:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wanted to add my two cents.

I've spent several months in both Chicago and Seattle this year, both cities that have a great deal of Starbucks. The coffee really isn't that bad, but the blight and homogenization of having a store on every block is. It's a borish trend in this country: the corporate drive to make everything the same, coast to coast.

Anyway, I spent time in north Brooklyn for the RNC counterconvention this year as well (www.jbranstadphotography.com/counterconvention.htm). I fell in love with the neighborhood and the city because it was differant and diverse. I don't mean this to criticize some of the other places I've been, but NYC is one of the few places left in this country with such a strong identity.

I hope to God the people living there can preserve that. Good luck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unfortunately Starbucks in exporting its urban blight strategy
Posted by: Tuuuulia on Aug 9, 2005 2:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you write: Starbucks is the urban Wal-Mart, and is a powerfully nasty symbol and metaphor for the homogenization of America. this might be true but for those of us who live outside of the US, the problem is that Starbucks is exporting itself and they're applying their same strategy of urban blight. (Starbucks also applies its 'cluster approach' to central London so their outlets never seem to be out of direct line of sight.) for us, Starbucks is the nasty face of globalisation and represents a total lack of respect for local culture and preferences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

are you blind or dumb?
Posted by: fdd1 on Aug 9, 2005 5:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where were you when burger king, mcdonalds, taco bell/kfc, dunkin donuts, children's place, jennifer convertibles, foot locker, petland discounts (now gone), sleepys and even gem stores opened a block or two away from the site your complaining about.

and just because you "support" the old LES and it's residents still does not mean you aren't the cause of the gentrification.

the old LES radicals would sh*t themselves hearing you wrap your beliefs in their flag. the neighborhood would have killed for a service like starbucks or any mainstream store back in the day. but now you'd rather see people spend money at white artist hangouts like lotus. stop jerking your knee and wake up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: are you blind or dumb? Posted by: sasha40
as they say in nyc: puh. leeze.
Posted by: mauradotcom on Aug 9, 2005 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'oh no, my gentrification got gentrified!'

the anti-starbucks argument is so simplistic, not to mention so elitist precious-urban-white-kid. please get over yourself and do some actual research before spouting off from your cozy spot of privilege. starbucks as the wal-mart of urban areas? the lower east side as the 'home of counterculture'? yeah, those $12 cocktails and velvet ropes are sure causing revolutions. please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ask the Starbucks employees if they want it closed.
Posted by: clovissimo on Aug 9, 2005 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I challenge you to go into the new Starbucks and tell the employees your grand platitudes about the LES being the seat of American counterculture, and then ask them to quit their decent-wage and well-benefitted jobs to join your protest. Also, being familiar with most of the other coffee joints you mention, I bet the ratio of minorities employed by Starbucks to those employed at the other shops you mention would be five to one. Those other coffee shops are refuges for white hipsters like yourself. I'll still go to them instead of Starbucks (one on your list is my favorite in NYC), but your senseless protest against Starbucks is the kind of thing that makes people ignore your otherwise admirable principles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part 1: Billioniares rush to the aid of Starbuck$ Corporation.
Posted by: RobinEublind on Aug 9, 2005 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am somewhat repulsed by some of the lame, timid defenses of Starbuck$. Armchair corporate cheerleaders, its time to get out in the streets and defend Corporate Culture and stamp out Bohemia once and for all! Here is a report from Diva Denz on the frontlines:

Action Report

Billioniares rush to the aid of Starbucks Corporation.

Manhattan Billionaires could not sip their lattes idly while Starbucks Corporation faced attacks by pro-union protesters on Saturday, August 6. Instead, a bevy of Billionaires recognized our #1 specialty coffee retailer for its outstanding performance in union-busting and its continuing commitment to pay its baristas unlivable wages.

To touch off our defiant 'sip-in’, the Billionaires proffered a toast to “record-breaking profits”, while Diva Denz phoned her stock broker, demanding 1,000 more shares of Starbucks stock. But this celebration was cut short by the arrival of, alas, Starbucks Union picketers! Dr. DeBooks, in a fury not often exhausted by a Billionaire, snatched one of the Union’s flyers and brought it inside the store. Reading out loud in unutterable indignation, he sounded off the Union Workers’ grievances, including absurd things like livable wages, a decent number of hours, bathroom breaks, and similar claptrap that you might often hear the indentured class complain about.

Thankfully, we Billionaires distributed our own flyers to the customers, as we had our own points to make. Union-busting is “just good business”, as we all know. And these unprecedented profits are surely leading to unprecedented payraises, or at least Chairman Howard Schultz granted himself a 44% pay increase while leaving the baristas to their unlivable wages. Moreover, whining workers, if you need full-time status, just work more jobs!

At this point, the Regional District Manager appeared at the scene in an outrage over the turn of events. Without missing a beat, Billionaire Monet Oliver D’Place greeted him with our prestigious Better Billionaires Business Bureau Award for Outstanding Unfair Labor Practices, and as the manager blushed, surely from the unexpected honor, the stealthily corrupt Walkin Ondapoor snapped a camera on his priceless face.
... continued in part 2

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Starbucks No Angel, Deanna No Poser
Posted by: sasha40 on Aug 9, 2005 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to www.corpwatch.org, Starbucks is not exactly angelic- they subcontract labor from prisoners, and had to be prodded by Congress to use fair-trade coffee; as far as diversity goes, it took Magic Johnson assuring them personally that yes, black folks do drink coffee before they were willing to open a Starbucks in a black neighborhood (Charlie Rose)- but whether or not Starbucks sinks to the level of Wal-Mart is beside the point, isn't it? While those of us who have watched the neighborhood change over the years can put down Deanna's outrage as too little, too late, shouldn't we be thrilled that anyone can still muster passion for something that she herself admits was mostly lost when she got here? I've always felt that the new blood constantly injecting itself into the LES's badly abused veins proves the true indestructible magic that the place has. I also think Starbucks is great in its own place: a rest stop on the NJ Turnpike or anywhere in America where there's no cappuccino machine for 500 miles. But I was saddened when Starbucks took over the beloved variety store on 9th St and 2nd Ave, fondly known as the Monkey Store- wouldn't people rather have coffee at Veselka? I didn't think to try to steer people to the alternatives. Then again, most of those alternatives are still in business; Veselka's thriving, Cafe Orlin's thriving, hell, Porto Rico Importing's got 3 stores now, and Starbucks has moved out of the Monkey Store and across the street to where the late, very lamented Orchidia restaurant used to be, where no business has thrived since. In the end, Starbucks’ effect on the neighborhood may be minimal, but I agree that at Allen and Delancey, it will be an eyesore even more aesthetically disagreeable than the Sleepy's that now occupies Ratner's (horrible as that is), because of its aggressive corporate West Coast-ness. And I'll also bet neighborhood Latino folk largely go on purchasing their cafe con leche at their local cafe or bodega, the same as always.
Maybe part of the reason the Starbucks particularly bothers Deanna is because it’s clearly meant to target people "like her". I think that makes her resistance all the more admirable. If her cards make a few LES hipsters, or whatever the hell they are at this point, take a moment to think about being part of a community with history, culture and options beyond the next latte, outfit, or velvet rope, how can that be anything but good?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And just my two cents
Posted by: MsTasty on Aug 9, 2005 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wanted to say that Reverend Billy and all of his followers are annoying as fuck. He makes me WANT to go to Starbucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: And just my two cents Posted by: surfreality
i can support what deanna is saying
Posted by: loca on Aug 9, 2005 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my history on the l.e.s. goes way back, back beyond my own years to my parents, and I appreciate and support what deanna is doing. I understand the intricacies, but turning people towards neighborhood establishments with more character and history and closeness to the community is a great thing.
Yes there have been dunkin donuts and macdonalds here for quite a while... but starbucks now ushers in a new era. those other places, disturbingly enough, marketed unhealthy food with little nutrition zealously to a poor population... now, welcome to part 2 of the nightmare: they don't even want the po' folks business now - everything opening down on the l.e.s. is now being marketed to a wealthy population who traipses down here on weekends in their Mercedes and it seems lost on them that a lot of poor people still reside here. They also seem more comfortable in newer, slick places, rather than actually embracing the character and uniqueness of the hood they claim to love visiting, and trying out some of the more unique and weathered spots. $2.50 cup of coffee fits right in with this latest phase - the most vicious one yet - of gentrification that is pummeling us right now and decimating the last bits of unique character that were hanging on.... four 20+ story buildings starting to come up just in the next year, and more than that coming down the pipe. I don't see my longtime latino and chinese neighbors or myself (a mixed mutt of hungarian and irish parentage) benefitting from all this slickness at all. We constantly talk about how we suddenly feel like unwelcome strangers in the place we called home for so many years. I get my cafe con leche at castilla de Jagua on rivington or go to Bluestockings Bookstore on allen for great fair trade java though I have to stick to decaf these days. These places have been here since long before it was "cool" to be here and deserve supporting so they can stay here.
Bernie, above, is right: New York is less and less New York. More like a mall with the same types of stores every few blocks. My hope is that with so many great places to go, still hanging on, and with Deanna pointing them out to people, these smaller places with great community spirit will survive.
www.theloco.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

any good efforts appreciated
Posted by: loca on Aug 9, 2005 8:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is all the rebellion just supposed to die with a generation? I would welcome 50 deanna's to this neighborhood... people who come here and friggin' embrace the community and truly get involved and become the next generation fighting the complete malling/trumping/ of new york city.
we all came here after somebody else - we are all gentrifiers in that sense. Not everybody was lucky enough (and I say lucky despite the fights against landlords, lack of heat and hot water, and six floor walk up dump i lived in, years of fights and struggles of one kind or another to survive here) to have found a world like the l.e.s. Full of all the people who seemed to be rejected in some way by the slicker parts of new york... well now everyone wants to be down here in the nitty gritty l.e.s. Wish they all were like Deanna, actually caring about this place and all the people and ideas that somehow came together and made it what it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]