Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Media still run by white people; Pope still Catholic.

Posted by Deanna Zandt at 7:43 AM on January 12, 2006.


Checking in with the whiteness of the magazine industry, and providing 'explanations.'
whiteguys
I see white people.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Start Making Sense in your
mailbox!

 

The New York Observer's weekly media column decided to address the issue of race representation in magazine management with Lizzy Ratner's "Vanilla Ceiling: Magazines Still Shades Of White." Not surprisingly, the industry is one of the whitest in the media, as noted in Ratner's informal survey of the staffs of various magazines located here in New York, where 65% of the population identifies as non-white. Only Katrina van den Heuvel was willing to comment on the issue:

The Nation's publisher and editor, Katrina vanden Heuvel, acknowledged that the veteran weekly "need[s] to do a better job in this area." But, she said, masthead statistics were only part of the magazine's diversity story.
"We are always out looking for more diversity in terms of our writers, in terms of our editors," she said, citing efforts to recruit more minority freelance journalists as well as a recently created Nation Institute fellowship for writers of color and a new conversation series between mystery writer Walter Mosely and other minority writers and activists.
Editors for the other magazines declined to comment on staff diversity.

Gawker, ever the media critic, decided to assign an analyst -- their Special Correspondent for Brown-People Issues -- to the article. His findings:

"'Several industry professionals traced this silence to the fact that magazines are, in the end, just magazines: waxy-paged collections of ads and articles that may provide everything from political analysis to eyebrow-waxing advice, but are hardly essential guardians of the public interest,' Ratner writes. This, then, is the We Also Promote Eating Disorders And A Low Self-Esteem So Why Get Huffy Over Racial Discrimination defense.
'But, on the other hand, there is a diversity of magazines,' Newsweek editor Mark Whitaker tells Ratner. 'So it's just a different kind of diversity exists already.' This one is the Y'all Motherfuckers Got Vibe and Essence So Shut The Hell Up defense.
'There is definitely no sense of shame about not having a diverse staff the way there was 10 years ago,' an anonymous Asian-American glossy-mag editor said. Now we're seeing the Y'all Not Wearing Chains No More, So We're Not Going to Feel Shame No More defense.
And finally, 'I think, in people's minds, it's not like, 'Let's not hire any black people,'' said Hung author Scott Poulson-Bryant, a founding editor of Vibe. 'It's just like, 'I don't really know any black people to hire, and I don't really want to do the work to find out who they are.'' Which is the beloved Where the Hell Are All the Black People When You Need One? defense. "

Digg!

Deanna Zandt is a contributing editor at AlterNet, and manages Start Making Sense.


End of a Start Making Sense era.
Where to go for content after January 17, 2006.
Post by Deanna Zandt. January 13, 2006.
Your cellphone records are for sale
Gen. Wesley Clark is public guinea pig #1.
Post by Deanna Zandt. January 13, 2006.
Action alert: 'Brokeback' banned; China bans Wikipedia
This morning on "BANNED!": No gay cowboys for Sandy, UT residents; Chinese citizens blocked from access to Wikipedia.
Post by Deanna Zandt. January 11, 2006.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Just another reason we should be skeptical of media.
Posted by: lamar on Jan 12, 2006 10:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Headline: People of all colors still believe everything they read. Includes advertisements and porn, say insiders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Could you get any more non-scientific?
Posted by: YogiBear on Jan 16, 2006 12:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the article. It appears that the writer picked a conclusion and then chose data that mirrored her conclusion. Great journalism. From the article:

"IT IS DIFFICULT TO QUANTIFY JUST HOW NOT-DIVERSE the glossy world is. The Magazine Publishers Association doesn’t track its members’ racial or ethnic makeup...

The Observer conducted a survey of some leading New York magazines...magazine staff members who agreed to review their mastheads and provide diversity breakdowns.

The magazine survey didn’t include the publishing side of mastheads, but focused exclusively on editorial departments....

...the results of the survey revealed a world that looks little like the streets of New York, where nearly 65 percent of the population identified itself as nonwhite in the 2000 census."

Which assumes the magazine employees all live in New York City. If they don't, you ought not use them as representative or not representative of NYC residents. I wonder, if one were to include the greater New York area, would magazine staffs match the ethnic makeup more closely?

The article also cites the following anecdote to prove that blacks can't get jobs as journalists:

"The actress Regina Hall, who has won something of a cult following for her role in the Scary Movie franchise, also contemplated a career in the scribbling trades back in the 1990’s. She attended New York University’s journalism school, but after finishing the 18-month program she came to the stark, if surreal, conclusion that her chances of making it as a black woman in journalism were slim enough that she might as well just shoot the moon—and try making it as a Hollywood actress instead."

Yup, that sounds like proof to me!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]