Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is Sex Addiction B.S.?

Posted by Dr. Belisa Vranich, Huffington Post at 9:19 PM on September 5, 2008.


Maybe what we need are groups to heal our shame about sex, rather than programs that only serve to reinforce our neuroses.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Sex and Relationships in your
mailbox!

 

All week long I've had emails with a variation of the following:

"Am I a slut or do I have a sex addiction?"

Rather that give you just my opinion, I gathered some friends and colleagues -- experts in the field of sex in one way or another -- to get their takes to see if we could come to some consensus.

I certainly do not view sex addiction as a "disease" that requires 12 steps to cure. Apparently, I fit all the criteria for having a bona fide sex addiction to a T, except for one crucial element: shame. It is this one little horrific emotion that drives millions of so-called sex addicts to spend exponential amounts of money in therapy every year, and just as many to seek support in groups and addiction programs. This shame stems from the fact that many so-called sexual deviants are slapped with the label "sex addict" when there is, in fact, absolutely nothing wrong with liking porn, or anal sex, or spending an evening with a call girl. I don't even think there is anything wrong with using sex to deal with your emotions -- after all, there is some truth to the saying, "let's work it out in bed." Maybe what we need are groups to heal our shame around sex, rather than programs that only serve to reinforce our neuroses.

-- Annie Sprinkle, Ph.D. prostitute/porn star turned sexologist & educator

You may well be a slut, but that would be a morality call, not generally the purview of a psychiatrist. A sex addict is someone with a maladaptive predilection for escalating sexual engagement, despite an awareness of the negative consequences of such risky behaviors. A sex-addict tends to jones for sex much like a crack-addict for the rock, despite a conscious understanding of the downsides: physical risks, loss of relationships, and a kind of social developmental stunting. A sex-addict loses power to their addiction. The brand of "slut" typically implies that said slut is aware of her actions and is working it. All that said, it's apples and oranges (maybe bananas), as sex-addict is a psychiatric diagnosis and slut is a morality-based judgment.

-- Greg Dillon, MD, Lower Fifth Psychiatric, New York City

Call yourself a slut, regardless of what you are doing. If you have a sex addiction you are a sex-o-holic, and no one wants to hang out with a sex-o-holic ... but everyone wants to be friends with a slut. In fact, everyone wants to BE a slut these days. "Slut" has become a very glamorous term. I mean really, there are belts and tee-shirts and hats that are sold in the stores that say "slut" on them in bling-bling ish sort of letters. You can't find swag that says "sex-o-holic" on it so why the hell would I want to identify with that?

-- Joanna Angel, Director & Porn Star

If I had to chose between the two, I'd rather call myself a slut. My love and preoccupation with sex has lead to "drama" in my relationships only when I felt obligated to monogamy out of social expectations. Once I embraced my more "poly-amorous" or non-traditional feelings about sex the happier my sex life has become. We are all sexual beings and no two beings express their sexuality exactly the same. It only looks alike because of our socialization. Monogamy is not natural. It is a choice. A choice that makes sense if that's your desire. When it's more your family, culture, or community's demand then we got problems. Sex addiction is real, but methinks the public protest too loudly 'round the topic when their spouse or sexual partners don't adhere to the popular expectations. The more honest we are about how we like our sex the less time, and money, will be spent in clinics and courtrooms.

-- Mo Beasley, Author and Sexuality Educator

In the simplest terms, who's in control? You or the Hungry Kitty between your legs? If you find yourself being dragged around town by your G-string, then you may be addicted to the wham bam, thank you ma'am. Do you find you can't make rational decisions about who you're sleeping with? Do you regret more often than not who gets to worship your womb? Girls that are just horny can get that "itch" scratched and move on but those who are addicted never seem to feel like they've had enough, often feeling emptier after a sexual encounter than before they started.

-- Lora Somoza, sex educator & advice columnist

Maybe a composite of all is best? Here's mine given these answers:

If you are in control, have no shame, and practice non-monogamy with honor, then you can proudly call yourself a slut, eschew the condemning "addict" label, and steer clear of the 12 steps (for this one at least).

*all fun aside, for clinical guidelines on sex addiction please go here.


Is Pop Culture Finally Admitting That Women Like to Touch Themselves?
Maybe I’m imagining things, but has anyone else noticed more allusions to female masturbation on TV?
Post by Jill Filipovic. November 28, 2008.
How to Tart Up Your Infant
For a start, dress them up like a tiny prostitute.
Post by Tana Ganeva. November 27, 2008.
Obama and the End of the Military's Ban on Gays
With Barack Obama as president it's not just possible. Thankfully, it's probable.
Post by John Ridley. November 23, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
As a Male, I Agree
Posted by: curiousdwk on Sep 8, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that I would only call myself an addict if it was creating problems for me - not problems for someone else. I enjoy porn, but I wouldn't say I was addicted to it even if I enjoy it more than a lot of other people. I would prefer to have real sex to porn, but that isn't an option to me. If I could, I would probably be a male slut. But I would rather enjoy sex than enjoy liquor and I would rather enjoy sex than stamp collecting. And I would rather enjoy sex than pay my bills. But as long as I manage to pay my bills responsibly, I wouldn't confuse my preference with an addiction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As a Male, I Agree Posted by: DaBear
The Grand Variety of Human Beings, Not Lists
Posted by: mamadanc on Sep 8, 2008 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are a wonderfully complex species with an amazing range of behavior. We do not fit into easy symptomology lists as inconvenient as they may be. People are motivated by an infinite number of things and that's what moves us to act whether it be sexual or otherwise. Sexual addition and twelve step programs are just an outgrowth of our culture. Americans love reductionism. We like lists, lists of any variety because it makes things easy. Lists like the symptoms of sex addition and the 12 things you can do to cure yourself of addiction. Lists are part and parcel of capitalism...they sell books and programs and a "do this now and you'll be fixed" mentality. A thoughtful critique would be more in line than another list. This article was an interesting start.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're tackling the wrong addition.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Sep 8, 2008 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Judging by extreme fight shows on TV, bad boy glorification in rap "music," and a stady state of bloodshed in movies, we need to take care of our addiction to violence.

At least sex is a natural act with mostly pleasurable consequences. But what does it do to us to witness disembowelments, self-beheadings by chainsaw (as I saw on PRIME TIME TV!), and other forms of gruesome behavior on a regular basis?

We're worrying about the wrong addiction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bravo on the violence connection! Posted by: buffeliscious
VIRTUE
Posted by: Moore Hognutz on Sep 8, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"VIRTUE HAS NEVER BEEN AS RESPECTABLE AS MONEY." Mark Twain Innocents Abroad

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not helpful
Posted by: Jim on Sep 8, 2008 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a good friend who has spent most of his family's needed money on phone sex. He does not think this is a good use of money, but he can't stop until he's out of money. "Addiction" is a good term.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ridiculous conditioning
Posted by: terrizosia on Sep 9, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Slut is such a ridiculous word. I grew up being curious about sex and never felt ashamed about it. It's other people's repressed and judgemental views that, if one doesn't have a strong core, can lead to shameful feelings. I find the most repressed and condemning people to have been white American females, and that is what I am.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Definitions & realities
Posted by: QCao009 on Sep 9, 2008 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this age of Dr Phil pop psy and celebrity cures, the simplest way to label a problem so we can quickly popularize it and sweep in under the carpet is to label it a "disease". We did it with alcohol, we did it with tobacco, and we are now doing it with prescription drugs. Instead of the dependency resolved, we have condition accepted and then Dr. Phil and other practitioners of various religious denominations can just come lay their hands, hopefully not on the parts of our bodies they had labeled for abstention !!!

The reality is today's internet porn consumer didn't get there by himself. Gradually, the abuse of self and others has taken on more and more convenient and socially accepted forms. Today's abuser is the grandson of yesterday's pedophile. It is an involvement that has evolved and as Jerry Springer, Dr. Phil and Oprah continue to peddle these quick labels, we continue to ignore the causes so we can adopt the pop solutions and pay for the next pharmaceutical products on-line. Just look at the difference between Rush Limbaugh's rhetoric and the reality of his addiction. Truth be told, religion and the resulting conditioning is one of the very reasons generations of young people are still looking at their natural needs with shame and guilt. Hiding them, accepting them as sin, and taking pills for them will never change the reality of our human condition. Just as abstention branded and practiced in its current form has hurt a generation of young people, so will this branding of sex addictions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Addiction?
Posted by: Cybershaman on Sep 9, 2008 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have an oxygen addiction! When I try to stop this shameful movement of my ribcage I find that taking that next breath is all I can think about. I abstain for as long as I can but it's never for more than a minute. This compulsion to take another breath just shows how weak my will really is. ;)
OK, seriously, the person who obsessively seeks out sexual encounters or compulsively seeks self-gratification is stuck in a mental loop.
I suspect that when they are in the middle of a sexual experience they are mentally somewhere else (so they don't get the full experience and satisfaction from it) and while they are doing anything else they fixate on repeated sexual imagery. In other words they are never where they should be.
This may not be true in all situations, but I suspect it is true for most.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The jury is still deliberating
Posted by: kgs1947 on Sep 9, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Sex addiction" was coined by Patrick Carnes (1994) and he got a lot in return for his invention. The term is applied or adopted when someone experiences negative consequences for his sexual behaviors. His life is "out of control" when his best interests, identified by himself/herself, are not being served well.

I work with men...gay, bi, straight who want to embody their lives purposefully, sexually, passionately (www.transitionpower.com). It's been my experience, personally and professionally, that there is loads of shame around sexuality. We live in a sex-negative culture despite the proliferation of porn. Perhaps the existence of porn is evidence of our sex-negative attitudes.

My philosophy is, if you don't expect your mate to fulfill all of your emotional needs, why would you expect your mate to fulfill all of your sexual needs. Here lies the rub. How do you negotiate the fulfillment of your needs with compassion and realism? Most men struggle with even asking for what they need! They have been trained to either take it or bury it. And, neither works well. They have often been trained to resist receiving tender and passionate pleasure for fear of being feminized. They know how to get aroused and excited, but know little about entering into bliss and enjoyment. Wham-bam, it's over. Isn't that what men are expected to do?! I'm a man. I give, not receive. I'm in control, not you. I need to be the dominant, you're the submissive. What a crock!

We do our boys and girls a real disservice with this kind of training. So, when we do give ourselves permission to dive into the pleasures of sexual activity, guilt and shame tend to raise their ugly heads with a vengeance. Some guys, then, simply live double lives and try to live with the poisonous aftermath till they explode or "get caught" -- or they have use chems/drugs to pursue their needs/desires. More shame, and more chaos/drama! Some guys go numb or simply attempt to rely solely on solo pleasure...and become bitter and angry and feel "less than" adequately complete.

It's time we had a national forum where men and women can explore their sexuality and sexual power, their life force -- a national forum where men, in particular, can reexamine what it means to be masculine and sexual, leaving aside the issue of sexual orientation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's get out of denial and start getting REAL
Posted by: lovercat2942 on Sep 9, 2008 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a recovering drug addict, I quote our first step, "We admitted we were powerless over our addiction, and our lives had become unmanageable." This can be applied to ANY form of addiction, including sex addiction. One's whole life revolves around our particular addiction, around getting that next fix. It doesn't matter if that next fix is food, sex, prostitution, drugs/alcohol, gambling, spending, cigarettes, or yes, religion. That next fix takes precedence over everything else we need to do in our lives. We don't care what the consequences are or the effects of our behavior on others when we are deeply entrenched in our particular addiction. We just want whatever it is to fill that hole in our guts and make ourselves "happy," to numb our feelings, to take that pain and hurt away. And the above may be difficult to admit, but it is REAL.

Most 12-Step fellowships have some form of literature in which one can test and see if one has that form of addiction--and there is no shame involved in simply admitting one is an addict. The shame, which we learn to work through, has to do with the effects of our addiction on ourselves and the other people in our lives, and we learn to get real with ourselves and others and stop the dysfunction in our lives. The people in the fellowship are there to help one another live more focused, happier, healthier lives.

Sex addiction is real, not imagined, not B.S. There wouldn't be at least three 12-Step fellowships covering various aspects of sex addiction if it weren't real. And the quicker we get real with ourselves, the better chance we have to work through this addictive behavior and live more productive, happy lives, getting real with others in the process.

We can't afford to play denial games with ourselves, such as "am I a slut or am I not a slut." We just need to get real with ourselves and come to grips with whether we are truly happy or not when we are acting out and what we can do if we are not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexual immaturity
Posted by: talkingrrl on Sep 9, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our country is so sexually immature. People are woefully uneducated about human sexuality.(look at the teen pregnancy & STD rates) Sex addiction is real and ruins people's emotional lives. We live in a confused culture riff with out dated stereotypes; women are labeled sluts and men are labeled studs. We promote and sell sex in every area at the same time shame people for being sexual. As a society we refuse to have open and honest discussions about homosexuality, prostitution, and pornography. Instead the right wing labels all sexual behavior that isn't for procreation as shameful and slams any other view point. It's no wonder we have high teen pregnancy and STD rates. Who knows how many people are addicted to internet porn,prostitution and other sex addictions. With out honest sex positive education we can expect more addicted sexual behaviors and more emotionally unhappy people. For people interested in learning more about sex addiction Patrick Carnes has written several books on the subject. Check out, "Out of the Shadows".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sex addiciton is particularly problematic because our culture is sex-negative
Posted by: DaBear on Sep 9, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because our culture is sex negative and largely emotionally ignorant as well (we go from stimulus to rage faster than anyone else on the planet... why? Hmmmm.. mebbe because we are conditioned by our culture from an early age to REPRESS our natural emotional range and see life as a series of binaries rather than 3D continuum...). We get extreme acting out as a result. Some of that is genuine addiction but I know from having spent years in S.A. and therapy that much of is simply emotional ignorance compounded by not understanding sex and sexuality in the context of a human human experience and that, all along a broad continuum of expression. The sex-addict term or diagnosis is grossly overstated however in a sex-negative cult where any affinity for sexual pleasure or varied experience is seen as deviant. This is a no-brainer. The bigger issue is in the "treatments" proffered for genuine sex-addiction: the 12-step replacement-as-cure.

Any 12-step program is merely a replacement addiction. The whole powerlessness acceptance process sets up the participant for self-fulfilling prophecy and perpetual reliance on a replacement for the sexual acting out; the 12-step group. In S.A. I got to know many people who genuinely had a problem and they found that replacing it with a 12-step addiction helped them not have the sexual acting out problem. Yes, it does provide the "victim" with reduced sexual acting out or "sobriety" but it rarely actually solves the underlying problem. I found that a divorce from a mismatched partner and mating with someone else actually yielded better results and zero shame as well. The problem wasn't that I was powerless, the problem was I was trying to be monogamous with a person on the opposite end of the continuum and I was too frightened to face that reality. My ex and I are still friends, but now I have a lover. But in a sex negative culture, I spent decades thinking I was a sex addict. When I went to SA for nearly two years I realized I was "addicted" to the group, so I hadn't solved anything. But the process did help me identify that problem underneath which was I was monogamous with someone I was not compatible with. She's married again as well and happier... SO that leads me to believe that some of this addiction stuff is arising more from a lack of emotional intelligence and specifically a complete lack of a context for healthy and normative sexual range for human beings. But how can anyone find that in a cult that is run by at least one dominant major religion with a fundamentalist penchant for sexual infantilism? You get millions of adults thinking they're sex addicts and a culture fully willing to say, yeah, it's a problem, buddy. The ones who get hurt the most are the ones whose lives look like a problem contrasted against a societal expectation that is complete craptasm. S.A. and other 12-steps should always be seen as a behavioral replacement therapy and those with genuine problems should use them with that in mind. When people don't, the groups tend to self-feed, deeming anyone with a sexual inclination as an addict in denial. Now, THAT to me is a real problem.

Stoopid is as stoopid does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah I was gonna think of that.
Posted by: DaBear on Sep 9, 2008 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Best. Post. Ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slut/sex addiction?
Posted by: Blacktiger on Sep 9, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Away back in the mists of time past, a male got jealous because his female was checking out the other guys before she decided on a partner. As time went on the guys thought they had the right to expect their females to stay barefoot and pregnant beside the cooking fire. Well what do you know, they still do!!!The males meanwhile would get a little tired of the steady recipe served at home cave and went looking for a bit of variety. OOPS! they still do! Then one day the very first sckitzoid heard voices and decided to write down what the voices said=the first bible=sex is bad, anything to do with sex other than procreating and keeping the family together is BAD.

So back to subject, over in Europe sex is not a big deal. In Holland they have the red light district. In England the Queen's son marries the person who fits the bill of next Queen. Problem was he was already in love with a married woman. Therefore nobody is happy, one ends up dead, the other divorces, and in the end the tramp marries the King in waiting. So who's the slut????

Then we consider America, the Quakers, a religious sect came across the ocean to a new land to live how they wanted= ethics of life handed down through the years, by men!!! Women who broke away were considered prostitutes and tramps. Wonder what men are called who do the same thing? Oh Yes they are GIGILOS!!! Thing is they don't get the shaft reputation wise.
Anyway we all know how the story goes from there, so my outlook on the whole subject if it feels good do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Slut/sex addiction? Posted by: antonius116