Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Letterman Admits Extortion Plot; Sexual Liaisons With Staffers

Posted by Melissa McEwan, Shakesville at 12:22 PM on October 2, 2009.


Last night on his show, David Letterman took ten minutes to share with his audience the story of an extortion plot.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Video in your
mailbox!

 

[Trigger warning.]

Last night on his show, David Letterman took ten minutes to share with his audience the story of an extortion plot—including the writing of a fake $2 million check, his testimony in front of a grand jury, and the arrest yesterday afternoon of the extortionist—and also confessed, without details like when or why, to having had sex with female employees of the show.

Despite the idiotic headline, this piece very accurately summarizes the segment, which I found to be profoundly uncomfortable to watch, even knowing the content of what he was going to say. Throughout the story, he refers obliquely to the "creepy stuff" he'd done, over which he was being extorted, and the moment where he at last reveals what the "creepy stuff" was (at 7:40), the reaction from the studio audience is, well, rather creepy itself—even given all the relevant excuses for nervous responses, etc.

[The video's in the window to your right. Starting at 7:40]

 

Now, of course, we get to: What was it, what was all the creepy stuff [audience laughs] that he was going to put into the screenplay and the [book], and, uh, the creepy stuff was that I have had sex with women who work for me on this show. [audience murmurs] Now, my response to that is: Yes, I have. [audience laughs] I have had sex with women who worked on this show. [audience applauds] And, and would it be embarrassing if it were made public? Perhaps it would. Perhaps it would. [audience laughs] Especially for the women! [audience laughs and applauds]

Part of the reaction is discernibly "Way to go, Dave!" from people who think it's great he's had loads of HOT SEXXX WITH CHICKS, but part of the reaction is palpable relief that the "creepy stuff" wasn't worse:

At least he's no Polanski.

 

 

No. Not according to him, anyway. According to him, it was just some consensual sex with some ladies who happen to work for him—as if that's incidental and not a major ethical problem, even if they weren't coerced by virtue of their employment.

 

 

I suppose such questions are easily drowned out by laughter at self-deprecating jokes about "Lutheran Midwestern guilt" and how embarrassing it would be for his conquests for people to know they had sex with him. Har har.

 

 

Jesus. I'm so done with this fucking week.

Digg!

Tagged as: letterman, sex scandal, extortion

Melissa McEwan writes and edits the blog Shakespeare's Sister.


In Trying to Prevent Gay Marriage, Texas May Have Accidently Abolished it for Everyone
It's rare a story about banning gay marriage actually has a silver lining.
Post by Liz Langley. November 18, 2009.
Video: The Victimization of Carrie Prejean? How a Sex Tape and a Softball Question From Larry King = Christian Persecution
The former Miss California is being presented as a Christian martyr, even after her pornographic video surfaced.
Post by Adele Stan. November 13, 2009.
Transgender Asylum-Seeker Caught in Immigration Detention Hell
Esmeralda never realized that her experience in detention would match the trauma of discrimination she had faced back home.
Post by Staff. November 12, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
as long as they were colleagues and not interns
Posted by: whealeydj on Oct 2, 2009 12:50 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who gives a damn? i sure don't

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can we get an alternet editor to go check on Britney Spears...
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Oct 2, 2009 1:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and that dead chick who married that billionaire who had that son who also croaked. I have misplaced their names, and they desperately need our attention in this, the most peaceful and prosperous of all ages.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IS THERE A CHANCE
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 2, 2009 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That Letterman will finally stop referring to the Clinton, Lewinsky thing as though it happened yesterday? I'm glad they caught the guy. But Dave sure has alot of explaining to do. The new wife can't be thrilled about this. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You're right; the audience reaction is downright pathological...
Posted by: wellaware lec on Oct 2, 2009 4:54 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'Nuf said.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meh.
Posted by: CanuckKid on Oct 2, 2009 9:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He did the right thing in coming clean on it immediately - now it's no-one's business but his and his family's.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Meh. Posted by: koolwoman
Watch less television
Posted by: thrdr on Oct 3, 2009 3:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Looks like the latest Polanski dustup's gotten to the author; Polanski's been raping young girls all over Europe for three decades . . . and now David Letterman's been raping his female staff for years. Throw hands up, pull hair, shake head.

What a waste-of-time article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Watch less television Posted by: thrdr
Puritanism is not dead!!!
Posted by: ETSpoon on Oct 3, 2009 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's alive and well on the American left!

Now I'm beginning to understand why so many small-time pornographers are Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what the real story is...
Posted by: qwertyu on Oct 3, 2009 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don;t care about his sex life, I care about the fact that he censors artists on a regular basis: Bill Hicks (he apologized for this), but the other artists: Ani DiFranco and John Cameron Mitchell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

better to be safe and not have sex with anyone, ever...
Posted by: art guerrilla on Oct 4, 2009 3:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the author -who i'm betting dollars to donut holes is a young-and-stupid who doesn't know shit about shit, except how to get her knickers twisted in a knot over anyone having sex with anyone else that is not in some pre-approved manner of HER choosing- who only allows worshipful veneration of womanhood as the only and highest purpose of sexual relations,...
sheesh, it is REALLY dispiriting to hear alternet -and most any other pwogwessive loudmouths- go all prude on ANYONE who dares to have sex in a non-approved, non-prescrived, non-PC manner not to the author's liking...
yeah, damn dave letterman (who i don't give a shit about, personally) and ANYONE (um, i mean MALE anyones, female anyones who have sex with younger and more desirable males(females) are simply being empowering and shit) for actually acting out on NATURAL IMPULSES which EVERY MALE (female?) on this planet has...
geez, i'm about sick to death of alternut's weird take on MANY issues, including (mostly male mal-sexuality -which is virtually ANY sex a male wants) calvinist views on sex, the ten millionth IDIOTIC article on stupid fucking vegans (dog damn, why can't they go back to vega?), and the 100 millionth article by some young-and-stupid grrls who don't know shit about shit telling me how society is supposed to work for THEIR moronic sensibilities...
grow the fuck up...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
eof

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Staffers likely pursued Letterman
Posted by: scheherezade on Oct 4, 2009 8:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody near the media industry knows the staffers in question likely approached Letterman for sex first.

The media's faux outrage over this duh incident has to do with the industry's vestigial habit of self-promoting itself as "creative."

The embarrassment factor here has less to do with Letterman's personal life than with the inevitable questions raised about "talent" versus sex favors, nepotism, etc. in industry hiring practices.

After all, if word gets out staffers in "creative" fields can blow their way to a promotion, it might raise uncomfortable questions about things like product "artistic merit."

The media industry must practice careful image control to maintain the fiction of a community of creative geniuses who rise to the top through raw talent, to share their gifts with ordinary Americans for a small fee.

In reality, the industry is based on a business model, with all the associated corruptions. It currently operates at the stage of a corporation whose CEOs have just about cleaned out company working capital for "bonuses," expensive travel, gifts to mistresses, etc.; leaving an empty shell propped up only by stock price fumes.

Of course, the poor quality of just about everything emanating from the industry in recent years attests to the minor role "talent" plays in hiring, in front of or behind the cameras. In addition to Letterman's behind-camera romps with staffers, the number of celebrity children in the business is a visible symptom.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grousefeather
Posted by: Grousefeather on Oct 4, 2009 8:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the point of being rich and famous if you can't screw the women who throw themselves at you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]