Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Hot Chicks Eating Burgers: Carl's Jr. Finds a New, Sexist Way to Hawk Its Disgusting Crap

Posted by Tana Ganeva, AlterNet at 12:01 PM on July 8, 2009.


Carl's Jr.'s fattening, noxious non-food isn't just for dude-bros anymore. Now it's for scrawny hot chicks!

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Sex and Relationships in your
mailbox!

 

It’s a little-known industry secret that models and actresses eat massive amounts of fast food. That’s why Carl’s Jr.’s recent series of ads, featuring “top-rated bikini body” Audrina Patridge ramming a Carl’s Jr. burger in her mouth while wiggling around in a gold bikini, is both realistic and helpful.

“To look this hot in a bikini” she coos, “I have to give up ... like ... everything. But there is no way I’m giving up that Terriyaki burger. I have to be a little bad. I call it my ... bikini burger.”

Is this a public service announcement? Because it's about time somebody armed women with the information they need to achieve the sexy, lithe frame of a pre-pubescent boy with fake boobs.

But that’s not the only way Carl’s Jr. has chosen to empower women. The burger chain is also offering some lucky "girls" the life-changing opportunity to star in their own Carl’s Jr. commercial. A few days ago Feministing posted a blog about a craigslist ad promising women 1,000 dollars and a spot in a Carl's Jr./Hardees ad if they “submit a video of themselves eating one of their burgers and is "hot" enough for their marketing campaign.”

While the Craigslist ad is down, the campaign is still in the works. And if you needed more convincing of the burger chain’s noble intentions, the kicker to the campaign, itself aptly titled “Hot Chicks Eating Burgers”, is “More than just a piece of meat.” It’s like a fun-house mirror version of the ads in the Dove 'real beauty' campaign (in themselves problematic, but not in such a vomity way.)

Now, before Carl's Jr. decided to promote the interests of women, their ad campaigns for a million years consisted of those infuriating "dude-bro" commercials. In those ads, manly, attractive guys did manly things like ignore their carping, whiny girlfriends while eating manly things like Carl's Jr. burgers.

The ads were skin-crawlingly, bile-inducingly sexist. (Sarah Haskin's has a great take-down here). They didn't just reproduce fucked-up gender stereotypes the way most mainstream advertising does, or rely on the milder sit-com sexism of the "women keeping their slob husbands in line" variety. It was more like this: life is hard because women are obnoxious idiots that want to control you. But, here's how you can a)control them instead b) escape them c) trick them into having sex with you. Also, eat Carl's Jr. burgers cause real men EAT MEAT, not the broccoli their castrating girlfriends keep pushing.

So, if their M.O. in the past was to shill their crap by tapping into larger societal contempt for attractive women, what's the strategy with the latest campaign? Exploiting sexist stereotypes, while selling to women and getting women to do their advertising for them? And all the while keeping their target audience -- straight dudes -- tuned in with ads showing semi-nude waifs tonguing burgers pornographically.

There's something for everyone!

Digg!

Tagged as: sex, women, sexism, advertising, carl's jr.


MSNBC's Brewer Adopts Anti-Gay Rhetoric
Anchor Contessa Brewer's introduction of a segment about Maine's repeal of a law allowing same-sex marriage is right out of the right-wing playbook.
Post by Jamison Foser. November 4, 2009.
Meet the 28 (Male) Anti-Choice Dems Who Are Stalling Health Reform
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) claims he's recruited over 40 anti-choice Dems to sabotage the current bill.
Post by mcjoan. November 3, 2009.
Sex for World Series Tickets?
A Craig's List ad goes sadly wrong.
Post by Richard Blair. October 28, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
And how about
Posted by: Ahimsa on Jul 8, 2009 12:27 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Gay Camaro Add?
WHat are your opinions about it?
I mean, I agree that having hot chicks selling burgers is kinda infantile, but is it worth all this?
What if there were semi-nude sweaty studs selling you the same burger?
Would it still be disgusting?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And why are hot women "sexist"? Posted by: Defenestrator
» RE: And how about Posted by: debocracy
Liberal men are sexist, and this surprises you?
Posted by: RandPaul2010 on Jul 8, 2009 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will feminists finally get that your male Democrat friends only pretend to care what you think so they can have sex with you? And they only support abortion so they don't have to deal with the consequences of broken condoms? Look at the disgusting way women are portrayed in Hollywood movies and Madison Avenue ads. Both of these industries are run by liberal men. I'm a guy here to spread the truth: we don't really care what you think or say. We just want to have sex with you. At least I feel guilty about it. Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and John Edwards are laughing their asses off behind your naive (and cute) behinds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree... Posted by: lupuslefou
» How would you know? Posted by: cdmsr
» RE: How would you know? Posted by: RandPaul2010
» Lesbians of the world, rejoice! Posted by: RandPaul2010
oh please...
Posted by: lupuslefou on Jul 8, 2009 2:03 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...sad to hear people still frothing about commercials. Yes, they MIGHT be sexist - I personally don't think so - but so what? They are merely ads fer Christsakes! Did you really expect some intellectual intercourse over the finer aspects of fast food dining? Perhaps a in-depth 30 second analysis of the protein/carb/sugar content of a double bacon cheesburger? Sex sells - get over it. People who get all upset about sex being used to sell something are usually those whose own body is well past the litheness herein described.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm not all upset, but Posted by: Aimleft
Get over yourselves
Posted by: maxfrisson on Jul 8, 2009 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just the ugly head of your Puritan heritage sticking out of your underpants again.

Nothing wrong with this ad or the new A-Holes ad that the Xians are so upset over. Hey have you ever seen British or French TV?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why does sex = sexism?
Posted by: Q30 on Jul 8, 2009 3:42 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's all-emotion/no logic screeds like this that make it harder to take so-called "feminists" seriously.

For instance we have the obligatory (and meaningless) sentence: "larger societal contempt for attractive women". Riiiight. As we all know, products are often advertised by placing them into the hands of contemptable people that everyone hates. *Headdesk*

And as for the actresses in the commercials-- the women being disrespected-- they don't seem particularly unhappy to be in the commercial and they're mercifully off the hook for collusion. Presumably, the poor dears were hypnotized.

If the author truly doesn't like the idea of women being portrayed as irrational whiners, it might be a good strategy to tone-down the irrational whining.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sensuality = (bad) sex Posted by: curiousdwk
I agree that the ads are completely sexist
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Jul 8, 2009 6:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those well paid and callous young women are leading men to their untimely deaths through overconsumption of cholesterol.

That is what the article is about, isn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the idiots on this thread
Posted by: SalB on Jul 8, 2009 10:16 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carl's Junior is essentially telling women that it doesn't want them to buy their product unless they are shaped like 2% of women. So, vote with your dollars. That is essentially what this article is saying. If you want to go further, you can tell Carl's Junior that you are voting with your dollars, because that is all they care about.

If this were racist imagery, would there be this much defense of it? Yes overly sexualized women in advertisement is sexist because it is aimed at men with the intention of making women commodities. The previous ad campaign, with the guys escaping the women they [actually claim to] love to eat burgers at Carl's Junior and other sexist ads indicates that Carl's Junior has no intention of attracting female customers. They think that women do not earn money and that guys buy women all their meals, even shitty fast food meals. OF COURSE there is a campaign for "normal girls", they are tapping into the 'Girls Gone Wild' audience as well. If you can't see that, you're hopeless.

Makes me wish I was a lesbian cuz unfortunately, you can't find a good dick that isn't attached to an asshole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your feminist logic isn't.
Posted by: countingdaisies on Jul 9, 2009 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the females are the ones doing all these things you don't agree with, why aren't you putting the blame on them? It's odd how you think it's great that they can make money doing porn, but an ad is somehow different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They may be extremely unhealthy, but...
Posted by: Pax1 on Jul 17, 2009 9:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While they are what will probably end up killing you, and while their ads are sexist, at the mention of a "Teriyaki Burger", I jizzed myself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Appeal to pure instinct isn't sexism
Posted by: ThinkLife on Jul 21, 2009 9:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Exploiting sexist stereotypes? No, it is exploiting sex. Period.

Sex is sex, and most of us need and want it. We get excited when we see it, especially men but probably women as well.

It's not sexist to want it, and this ad merely appeals to that primal instinct.

By the way, one definition of sexism: "Sexism, a term coined in the mid-20th centuryShorter Oxford English Dictionary, 6th edition, refers to the belief or attitude that one gender or sex is inferior to or less valuable than the other." from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexist

It's so silly (as Q30 noted) to think this ad degrades all women. How does it do so? By paying her probably lots of money to show off her exquisite body? No! By exposing parts of her luscious parts, by her own free will, which she admits in the ad she works very hard to maintain/create? No!

Is it any coincidence that most radical feminists are really not very good looking? I think it's a self-esteem issue--and not on Audrina's part, but the writer's and other feminists.

I think you're simply jealous of that bangin' body of Audrina's! (Oh, how I would please and tease her! Gimme gimme gimme a partridge in my pear tree!) Jealous of all that sexual attention and desire.

And afraid to admit that your body isn't as sexy as hers. Jealousy drives a lot of so-called feminism.

Why not rant about the child sex slave trade? There's a real problem that we don't hear enough and do enough about.

Kids are being raped and coerced by adults. () It is sick, and you're whining about being degraded by Audrina's hotter-than-thou bod while she slurps down a meaty burger??

Get real--do something that helps somebody who is truly, desperately in need!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]