Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ross Douthat Thinks We Should Bring Back Puritanism

Posted by Tana Ganeva at 4:00 PM on May 26, 2009.


Douthat shows, once again, how deeply bereft of good ideas the conservative movement is.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Sex and Relationships in your
mailbox!

 

According to the 5 millionth study released on the subject just this week, American women are afflicted with a deep-seated  dissatisfaction ... or  unhappiness ... or malaise ... you know, a "problem with no name", just like that other problem Betty Friedan wrote about in the 1960s. Except that this time around, everyone can blame feminism!

That’s what Ross Douthat does in a New York Times op-ed, (very loosely based on the study) that the NYT chose to highlight with a slot on their online front page.

On some fronts — graduation rates, life expectancy and even job security — men look increasingly like the second sex. But all the achievements of the feminist era may have delivered women to greater unhappiness.

Douthat also chalks up the crushing dissatisfaction plaguing women to another terrible development: the "advance" of single motherhood:

[Conservatives and liberals] should also be able to agree that the steady advance of single motherhood threatens the interests and happiness of women. Here the public-policy options are limited; some kind of social stigma is a necessity. But a new-model stigma shouldn’t (and couldn’t) look like the old sexism. There’s no necessary reason why feminists and cultural conservatives can’t join forces — in the same way that they made common cause during the pornography wars of the 1980s — behind a social revolution that ostracizes serial baby-daddies and trophy-wife collectors as thoroughly as the “fallen women” of a more patriarchal age.

Yes, instead of investing in resources to help single mothers, or a viable health care system, or secure reproductive rights, or a billion other public policy options, we should slut shame single mothers, and other alleged "sexual deviants". Then EVERYONE will be happy. Especially women.

But alas, in our hippie, anything-goes culture, publicly shunning people who have sex is not considered a viable policy option:

No reason, of course, save the fact that contemporary America doesn’t seem willing to accept sexual stigma, period. We simply don’t have the stomach for permanently ostracizing the sexually irresponsible — be they a pregnant starlet, a thrice-divorced tycoon, or even a prostitute-hiring politician.

In this sense, ours is a kinder, gentler, more forgiving country than it was 40 years ago. But for half the public, it’s an unhappier country as well.

With the failing conservative movement now primarily serving as a means for right-wing clowns to secure cushy, long-term contracts with Fox, the GOP is in dire need of fresh ideas to remain viable -- or in existence -- in the future. Ross Douthat's contribution? Advocating a return to Puritan America. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Digg!

Tagged as: sex, women, sexuality, ross douthat, single mothers


Idaho Republican Blake Hall Fired for Throwing Used Condoms on the Lawn of a Woman He Was Stalking
"It's unimaginable that a 56-year-old would be so deviant."
Post by Steven D.. November 10, 2009.
MSNBC's Brewer Adopts Anti-Gay Rhetoric
Anchor Contessa Brewer's introduction of a segment about Maine's repeal of a law allowing same-sex marriage is right out of the right-wing playbook.
Post by Jamison Foser. November 4, 2009.
Meet the 28 (Male) Anti-Choice Dems Who Are Stalling Health Reform
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) claims he's recruited over 40 anti-choice Dems to sabotage the current bill.
Post by mcjoan. November 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
No need to mislead
Posted by: bentonwilliams on May 26, 2009 4:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree that Russ Douthat is an idiot, misquoting him is no way to combat his idiocy. He didn't say "We need to slut shame women," so it should not be attributed to him. We progressives have truth on our side. We don't have to use misleading rhetoric.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No need to mislead Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
I Was There
Posted by: Arlene on May 26, 2009 5:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am coming up on the big 7-0. If he thinks the gains made by women in the last 50 years have made women unhappy, he has a serious mental problem.

I was at one of Betty Fridan's national demonstrations on Aug. 26, 1970. It was an epiphany for me and I have never forgotten it. Almost immediately after that, stories started appearing in the periodicals about the women's movement; or, feminism, being dead. Mark Twain's quote comes to mind.

The bad thing about this doggerel is that we have to keep fighting the same battles over and over again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what i think the quote was getting at
Posted by: free2disagree on May 26, 2009 9:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way that I read the quote that was provided, the suggestion was that we should be more equal and shame today's sexually promiscuous men as well as women, instead of only shaming the sexually promiscuous women, as was done in the past. This would be done in the hope of reducing single parenthood. I am not defending this position, but I think the article misinterpreted it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» RE: Impossibility!! Posted by: iago
Why not...
Posted by: adp3d on May 27, 2009 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...invite the Taliban to join the Republican Fascist party?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why not... Posted by: laoma
Conservatives' Crazy Reactions to Obama's Supreme Court Nominee
Posted by: IRIQUOIS227 on May 27, 2009 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I most sincerely hope that all these "conservatives" out there remember commentary like this. This type of garbage is commonplace among republicans. The Republican party is destitute of any good ideas, or good at all for that matter. They are a collection of rich liars, cheats, thieves, malcontents, murderers, sadists, and perverts. The are the party of the religious whackos, gun nuts, wingnuts, and Brazil nuts. they've stolen more money than even the worst of the dems have. Has everyone forgotten the election of George Bush by Antonin Scalia? Or what about Rehnquist harassing blacks at voting stations in '64. Let's not let the junior senator from Wisconsin, Joe McCarthy go by without a mention. Mr. Communism himself. Or Richard Nixon, along with his VEEP, had to resign the office of VPOTUS, AND POTUS in disgrace, and the first in US History. I could go on for hours, but it is irrefutable fact that the republican party, is diseased. Always was, Always will be. If you vote republican, you are diseased as well.

tedbohne

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What do we expect?
Posted by: Quannah on May 27, 2009 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ross Douthat replaced that human slug, William Kristol, on the opinion pages of the Times.

This article is written by just another clueless Republic who doesn't get the concept of equality, or women's struggles, or the need for parity.

Women's equality is a ridiculous notion to these people. And Mr. Asshat, errr... Douthat doesn't deserve a column in the Times.

Editorial choices like giving him a column are why I won't renew my cancelled my subscription.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ross Douthat is Pandering for a Paycheck
Posted by: kwfryatl on May 27, 2009 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...nothing more, nothing less.

Based on his photograph, he isn't anywhere near old enough to be drawing the conclusions he did in his article. Anyone who has observed the past 25 years alone and cannot see the progress of women is simply being intellectualy dishonest.

I am really disappointed the Times hired him - evidently, they've really lowered their standards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great
Posted by: JefffromCA on May 27, 2009 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's start with Bristol Palin, Larry Craig, Mark Foley, David Vitter, Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Math 101
Posted by: Jacksonian on May 27, 2009 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to Douthat, 40 years + feminism = unhappiness in 2009.

What if his math is just a little bit fuzzy?

What if the correct equation is: 40 years + Republican policies = unhappiness?

Maybe what's making us miserable is four decades of conservative dogma and doctrine coupled with breathtaking incompetence, unyielding rigidity, and rank hypocrisy.

Maybe what's making us miserable is a conservative economic policy which advocates fiscal responsibility while pursuing massive debt, government-sponsored corporate bailouts, tax cuts for the rich, and reduced or eliminated services for the public.

Maybe what's making us miserable is a labor policy which promotes growth and profits over workers and the environment.

Maybe what's making us miserable is the claim of patriotism and the hue and cry to "support our troops" from the people who brought us an unnecessary, unjustified war and whose torture practices make both the country and our military personnel in the field less safe.

Maybe what's making us miserable is that the U.S., once the envy of the world for its natural resources, work ethic, and spirit of determination, now leads the world in the manufacture not of a product or a design but of prisons and inmates.

Add to this a big dose of racism, homophobia, and religious zealotry, and factor in the outrage of no-bid contracts, drowned cities, crumbling bridges, a failed health-care system, and an economy that's in the toilet, and it becomes a little easier to compute 2 + 2 and come up with 4.

By Douthat's reasoning, though, today's misery is brought to you by the letter, "A." As in the scarlet letter. As in adultry. As in female hormones gone wild.

Why is it that when powerful men make bad mistakes, somehow women's sexuality is to blame?

Douthat may be a Harvard grad, but he needs a refresher course in math and logic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Could Back That Social Revolution
Posted by: Red State Gal on May 27, 2009 7:18 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A social revolution that ostracizes serial baby-daddies and trophy-wife collectors"--now, I could really get into that! If the Right took on male sexual irresponsibility as a serious social issue, I would definitely back them. Male sexual irresponsibility is the elephant in the room when abortion is debated. Male sexual irresponsibility is the elephant in the room when single mother poverty is debated. Get rid of male sexual irresponsibility, and a lot of polarizing issues practically go away. It's time the elephant got noticed!

Red State Gal
RedStateFeminists

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MISQUOTE/MISREAD DOES NOT ENLIGHTEN DISCUSSION
Posted by: maribelle on May 28, 2009 9:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given: Douthat is a throwback. BUT:

How did the genders get switched on this analysis?

"serial baby-daddies and trophy-wife collectors as thoroughly as the “fallen women” of a more patriarchal age."

Baby daddies and trophy wife collectors are MEN, yes?

Then why did this get "translated" as:

" we should slut shame single mothers"

I think he is saying we need to pile on the shame to the men, too. It's a lousy idea, but should be taken on its own terms, not misconstrued.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]