Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

NSA 'Routinely' Listened in on Americans' Phone Calls, Passed Around 'Salacious' Bits

Posted by Ali Frick, Think Progress at 10:23 AM on October 9, 2008.


Making a sexy phone call overseas? Despite Bush's insistence otherwise, it seems the spooks were listening in.
wiretap

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Sex and Relationships in your
mailbox!

 

Ever since President Bush confirmed the existence of a National Security Administration wiretapping program in late 2005, he has insisted it is aimed only at terrorists' calls and protects Americans' civil liberties:


- If somebody from al Qaeda is calling you, we'd like to know why. ... In the meantime, this program is conscious of people's civil liberties, as am I. This is a limited program designed to prevent attacks on the United States of America -- and I repeat: limited. [1/1/06]

- This is a -- I repeat to you, even though you hear words, "domestic spying," these are not phone calls within the United States. It's a phone call of an al Qaeda, known al Qaeda suspect, making a phone call into the United States. I'm mindful of your civil liberties. [1/23/06]

- People who analyze the program fully understand that America's civil liberties are well protected. There is a constant check to make sure that our civil liberties of our citizens are treated with respect. [2/28/08]

However, ABC News reports that the NSA frequently listened to and transcribed the private phone calls of Americans abroad, according to two former military intercept operators. These conversations included those of American soldiers stationed in Iraq and American aid workers abroad, such as Doctors Without Borders:


[Former Navy Arab linguist David Murfee] Faulk says he and others in his section of the NSA facility at Fort Gordon routinely shared salacious or tantalizing phone calls that had been intercepted, alerting office mates to certain time codes of "cuts" that were available on each operator's computer.

"Hey, check this out," Faulk says he would be told, "there's good phone sex or there's some pillow talk, pull up this call, it's really funny, go check it out. It would be some colonel making pillow talk and we would say, 'Wow, this was crazy'," Faulk told ABC News. [...]

"We knew they were working for these aid organizations," [former Army Reserves Arab linguist Adrienne] Kinne told ABC News. "They were identified in our systems as 'belongs to the International Red Cross' and all these other organizations. And yet, instead of blocking these phone numbers we continued to collect on them," she told ABC News.

Kinne called Bush's assurances that the U.S. was only tracking phone calls of a "known al Qaeda suspect" "completely a lie." Click here to watch ABC's report.

Digg!

Tagged as: wiretapping, nsa, abc news

Ali Frick is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.


Idaho Republican Blake Hall Fired for Throwing Used Condoms on the Lawn of a Woman He Was Stalking
"It's unimaginable that a 56-year-old would be so deviant."
Post by Steven D.. November 10, 2009.
MSNBC's Brewer Adopts Anti-Gay Rhetoric
Anchor Contessa Brewer's introduction of a segment about Maine's repeal of a law allowing same-sex marriage is right out of the right-wing playbook.
Post by Jamison Foser. November 4, 2009.
Meet the 28 (Male) Anti-Choice Dems Who Are Stalling Health Reform
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) claims he's recruited over 40 anti-choice Dems to sabotage the current bill.
Post by mcjoan. November 3, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
How Much
Posted by: QQOblivion on Oct 9, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How much you want to bet that the US government is spying on Americans' calling other Americans' WITHIN America, even though the government knows full well that the listened-to are not terrorists or criminals, but just have a sexy personal life that is entertaining for those listening??

Probably a lot (thousands? millions?) of Americans are victims of this government-sponsored domestic peeping-tom-ism.

Unfortunately, we will NEVER know the full extent of the domestic spying because of the FISA bill that passed overwhelmingly in Congress. Too bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How Much Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: How Much Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: How Much Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Right.
Posted by: Xynyx on Oct 9, 2008 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just one of the reasons why Progressives oppose such things. For that matter, this is one of the reasons why Conservatives would oppose such things, as well.

Since it seems that just about anyone having any sense at all would stand in opposition to such excesses, to such invasions of privacy... why is it being allowed to happen?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This was part of the reason Nixon was being impeached
Posted by: fanny666 on Oct 9, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read Article 2, paragraph 2 of Nixon's Letters of Impeachment, and compare to the above article and video:

"He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authorizing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; and he did direct the concealment of certain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of electronic surveillance."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush - Major league liar
Posted by: Magginkat on Oct 10, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who believes Bush after almost 8 yrs of never-ending lies deserves what they get. That man cannot open his mouth without telling a lie.

The whole purpose of the Bush/Cheney spying routine was to listen in on Americans. I suggest to you that a lot of "listening in" included the entire Congress. Blackmail can be a handy tool when all you have to go on is a mountain of lies.

I suspect that when the truth comes out (50 yrs) that it will show that not only Congress was spied on & blackmailed but that other public figures suffered the same fate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what about corporate & industrial spying?
Posted by: gregii on Oct 10, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These eaves-drops include business people with competitive market strategies and secret processes for manufacturing and other competitive secrets.

They are not complaining because (choose one):
A. They're too stupid to realize the risk?
B. They can't believe this administration will do that to them after all they have done for this administration?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How does the NSA know the content in advance?
Posted by: billwald on Oct 10, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How does the NSA know the content of a phone call without first listening to it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]