Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Continuous Police State: Hundreds of Demonstrators Detained at RNC

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Firedoglake at 6:46 AM on September 5, 2008.


Cops detained hundreds demonstrators on the final night of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

Police detained hundreds demonstrators on the final night of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul. Approximately 250 people were arrested shortly before John McCain took to the stage to accept the presidential nomination. That's in addition to the 422 people who had already been arrested earlier in the week.


Riot police held approximate 300 people, including journalists and observers for nearly an hour on an overpass spanning Interstate 94. Police instructed the crowd to get on the bridge, then announced that everyone on the bridge was under arrest. 


The Joint Information Center offered conflicting accounts about the status of the assembly permits for last night's gatherings. When I called at 4pm, a spokesman told me that the organizers of the March were slated to march from the capitol, through downtown, around the xCel Center and back to the capitol and that the protest was set to go until 7pm. 


By 5pm, CNN was reporting that the cops on the ground were telling protesters that their permit had expired. According to some reports, Sheriff Bob Fletcher announced that he was rescinding permits at news conference late Thursday afternoon, but when I called to confirm, the Joint Information Center told me that no permits had been revoked. 


Journalist Paul Demko was briefly arrested and flex cuffed on the bridge. By Thursday, the police had learned that it's bad PR to arrest journalists and protest observers along with demonstrators. Mind you, they still cuffed them, but they segregated them and let them go early.


According to one theory, the group on the bridge was a breakaway from a separate gathering, which was not permitted to march through downtown--hence the arrests on the bridge.


 Police used tear gas, concussion grenades and pepper spray to control the crowd.


The RNC took out a $10 million insurance policy to pay off police brutality settlements. This is the first time party host committee agreed to take out such a policy. I wonder how high their deductible is. 

Digg!

Tagged as: police, demonstrators

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
(VIDEO) More Torture by Taser: Cops Zap Man Offering No Resistance
This is part of such a clear pattern.
Post by Digby. November 7, 2009.
Right-Bloggers React to Fort Hood Exactly as Expected
Muuuuuuuuslim!
Post by Roy Edroso. November 6, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why do people tolerate this un-American betrayal of our basic freedoms?
Posted by: PaulC on Sep 5, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What kind of cowards are they?

I guess it is the same people who tolerate selling out America by sending our entire industrial base and all of our hard-earned technical know-how to Communist China.

Is that what is meant by the term "traitor"? Or does it have to be on a smaller scale, involving a poor person, as with tax evasion?

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bribery
Posted by: oregoncharles on Sep 5, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to the handy link in the article, the insurance company was Lexington Insurance in Boston and the cost was $1.1 million.

New York City just paid out $2 million in claims on a much smaller event. This policy made no financial sense for the company, so it constitutes a BRIBE to the RNC.

An official in the linked article "doubts" that police even knew about the deal. So why did they act as if they'd been told they were above the law? Police often do, but this reached new levels of blatancy.

The city of St. Paul (with a supposedly liberal mayor!) and the RNC engaged in a conspiracy to violate civil rights with impunity. The insurance itself documents it. And they bragged about it in the press!

How about suing both of them for that conspiracy? They don't have insurance for that.

Many crimes were committed, too, but the chances of actual prosecution are minimal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

100 MILLON FOR INSURANCE?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 5, 2008 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So how much did they pay the police? Granted, police reaction all over the country is ratcheted up, but this is unprecedented. Funny that they anticipated this much damage. Almost like taking out a huge life insurance policy out on someone and shortly thereafter they meet with a terrible accident. I wonder who underwrote the policy. Didn't they consider "pre-existing conditions"? Something here stinks. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: 100 MILLON FOR INSURANCE? Posted by: alan1111