Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lovely Wedding Ends with Bride and Groom Getting Tasered

Posted by Digby, Hullabaloo at 5:58 AM on July 30, 2008.


"The police must have felt overwhelmed and would naturally need to taser the groom or risk having to use deadly force instead."
taser

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

The Michigan wedding of Durango newlyweds Andy and Ania Somora came to an abrupt end last weekend after the bride and groom were tasered by local police and spent their wedding night in jail.

According to a news release from the Chikaming Township (Mich.) Police Department, Officer Jeff Enders responded Saturday to the Burnison Art Gallery in Lakeside, Mich., after gallery owner Judi Burnison asked for assistance with unruly guests at the Somoras' wedding reception.

Burnison, who rented the gallery to the Somoras for the reception, told Enders the party had gotten out of hand, and there were broken glasses and spilled drinks.

Burnison declined to comment Wednesday, but she said her lawyer would respond to questions.

However, no call was received as of Wednesday evening.

Enders told the assembled guests to leave, but many became upset, police said. Enders called for backup, and 14 law-enforcement agencies responded to help clear the crowd. Police said that many of the 100 guests left peacefully, but several continued to be disorderly and to swear at the officers.

However, eyewitness Kacpar Skowron, a professional Chicago photographer and friend of Ania Somora, said police overreacted and ruined a perfectly good wedding.

"My perspective is that the main officer (Enders) handling it was cool at first, but then he started threatening that everybody would be arrested. But trying to kick the party out at 11:20 (p.m.) on a wedding night when we had a contract to be there? He was a big jerk," Skowron said.

Skowron said the crowd got particularly unruly after police handcuffed Andy Somora's father and put him in the back of a police cruiser. He said the elder Somora, whom he described as "a distinguished older gentleman," was trying to talk to Enders to defuse the situation.

"I didn't believe it, but I witnessed it. It was brutal, and that's when Andy got really mad," he said.

Skowron said Andy Somora had to be restrained by police and was tasered at least twice. His wife also received a shock because she was touching her husband during one of the incidents. Skowron said husband and wife were both arrested, but Chikaming police would not confirm that claim, and no mention of the use of a taser is included in the news release.

Maybe there was no taser. But I wouldn't be surprised. Wedding receptions are notoriously dangerous and there were only 14 different law enforcement agencies present. The police must have felt overwhelmed and would naturally need to taser the groom or risk having to use deadly force instead. That, after all, is the rationale for taser use.

Here's a picture of the police having to defend themselves against the bride:

Hat tip to Susie Madrak

Digg!

Tagged as: police brutality, taser, bride, wedding, 14 law enforcement agenci, groom

Digby is the proprietor of Hullabaloo.


Pay Equity: Raise Your Voice for Equal Pay for Equal Work
Democratic leadership in the House have vowed to push forward with the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act.
Post by Christy Hardin Smith. January 8, 2009.
Oakland Residents Rise Up to Protest Brutal Murder By Police
"As I write this, rumors are flying and media is fanning the riot flames."
Post by Adrienne Maree Brown Brown. January 8, 2009.
In Gaza, Having to Choose Between My Pregnant Wife and My Mother and Siblings
Alaa is due any day now, but I also have the responsibility of my siblings, their kids and my mother, especially after my father was killed.
Post by Fares Akram. January 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Police state
Posted by: Pop on Jul 30, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When will the sheeple learn. This is a free country where you are free to totally submit, or take the conseqences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well... Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Police state Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Just another day
Posted by: marid on Jul 30, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in the land of the free and home of the brave. Taser use is being accepted by the average person who listens to the garbage put out by the Police State. They kill, plain and simple. Most people know little if any facts about their use, safety, or anything else, just repeat the company line.

For judges to bar Taser evidence or testimony from trials is just another clue as to the decline of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally!
Posted by: g on Jul 30, 2008 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until police officers used tasers against 'unruly' black-or brown-skinned teenagers, no one really cared. Now you know that it can happen to you, suburban mom, middle-aged professional, white-as-snow teetotaling college student. Now we all will begin paying attention. About time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Finally! Posted by: Zeugitai
cops and hooligans
Posted by: jwc1480 on Jul 30, 2008 12:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasn't my place of business being trashed. Why should I care? Let'em run wild.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: cops and hooligans Posted by: drmflorida
» RE: cops and hooligans Posted by: chuckjs
» RE: cops and hooligans Posted by: robbb3rt
Something old...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 30, 2008 3:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... "we don't need no stinking social skills!"

Something NEW... "What? you've never been told to GET ON YOUR KNEES at the WEDDING ceremony?"

Something BLUE... ELECTRIC BLUE


verily, the THIN BLUE LINE that makes its presence known...

┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
" ... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice... " ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ughh
Posted by: ohjeezigotaids on Jul 30, 2008 7:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
diiiissgusting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is why we teach our kids to never go to the police
Posted by: DaBear on Jul 30, 2008 9:22 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All you'll get is a violent and nearly always inappropriate reaction.

These are the hired thugs of the rich and behind every rich guy there's a crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be prepared to gather Objective evidence or else...
Posted by: socrates2 on Jul 30, 2008 9:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To paraphrase one writer above, "when will _we_ ever learn?"
In case anyone has been asleep the past three decades, guess who _defines_ who "the good guys" and "the bad guys" _are_? And guess _who decides_ who falls on which side of that dichotomy?
It is not you, ever!
The definition is created _and decided_ exclusively by those guys in the "thin blue line." Then conveniently they write boilerplate "police reports."
When you consider that unlike Cronkite, Rather or the "New York Times" there is no "fact-checking" as to who started what and who said what other than the unvarnished word of--you guessed it--the guy in blue...you begin to get the picture. Ever hear of "factually innnocent" people getting the Death Penalty? Guess who gathered the "evidence" and WROTE the reports?
And, tragically, (or sinisterly) DA's will buy that official version with a straight face, and will, in turn, sell it to judges and juries...
Lotsa luck to this bride and groom. Their only hope are the guests who, unfortunately, are easy to impeach as:
1. They are "friends" of the tazed and therefore have a "reason to lie for them."
2. How would the guests recall accurately?
They were in all probability drinking and therefore "their recall and perception of events was impaired at the time," unlike that of the "unbiased and sober" uniformed ones.
The only recourse, America, is buy a camcorder. Take one _everywhere_. Keep your cell phone on at all times of contact with the boys in blue and record your conversations.
Then watch the jurors freak out at the obscenity laced "commands" from their public servants. And contrast that with what they wrote _they said_ in their reports.
Ever notice that when someone is innocent-ish, (and _assaulted_ by uniformed individuals) rarely is there a _police_ videotape (usually its filmed _incidentally_ by a local TV or a bystander;and a DA for their "professional reason" wants to subpena _those_ tapes), but when a "suspect"/"bad guy" is obnoxious, dangerous, belligerent, and/or "acting up," the _police_ video manages to surface even _on national television_?
And, finally, horror of horrors, OUR taxes paid for those "non-lethal _devices_" (love that euphemism). Any questions?
It's a Brave New World.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FOR WHAT REASON WOULD YOU EVER CALL THE POLICE. IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 30, 2008 9:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when the police get there you have two.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Which are which here?
Posted by: Dak on Jul 31, 2008 8:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cops and hooligans...hooligans and cops...cops are hooligans....ahhhhhhh, NOW I understand. And these Twits in Blue wonder why public perception and respect are so low. But hey, they get paid well, whether they're fat and over 50, or have 6-pack abs, great muscles, but alas, no muscle between their ears. The sad fact is, we are fast becoming, if not already, a police state (for our own good and protection, OF COURSE!). Those terrorists, ya know?!
Sheeple...now that's a new term...so apt, and so applicable. Sad.
GMMelby, Pastor

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wait a minute...........
Posted by: flipperfacefred on Jul 31, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hold on, something isn't right about this story. 14 different law enforcement agencies? Can anyone even name 14 different law enforcement agencies that may have responded to a call like this? It may have been 14 law enforcement officers-but unless we include everyone from the local cops, county sheriffs, state police on up to the Men in Black it strikes me that the fact checking on this piece has fallen down somewhere.

In addition the lead implies that the cops actually zapped the bride, but in the story it is made clear that she was touching the groom and received an indirect shock-not the same thing.

Not to detract from the overreaction or brutality of the affair but taken in context: Asshole gallery owner wants to break his contract with a wedding party (there may be racist thinking involved in this part). Calls the cops who respond to the call as if it is a gang-related domestic disturbance. Dozens of drunk celebrants respond in anger at the reception (This was the reception, not the wedding ceremony) being disrupted and words are exchanged. Cops feel outnumbered and unable to accomplish their goal of protecting private property and resort to the use of force-in this instance a taser to do their job.

Of course the premise for them being there is to help a landlord break his contract and therefore on tenuous legal ground, the reaction of the crowd to their presence was understandable but as a story this one is overhyped using the same sort of "journalistic" standards we would expect from Fox.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Rosina
Posted by: johnrosina on Jul 31, 2008 3:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've noticed that hair-trigger fingers are the rule in Taser use anymore. Sometimes warranted but, exceedingly, not so much warranted.

My best friend is a cop and I tell him constantly that there is hardly a nickels worth of difference between many cops and so called criminals. Too much television!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And The Beat Goes On
Posted by: bc430 on Jul 31, 2008 6:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

http://www.nypost. com/seven/ 07292008/ news/regionalnew s/2nd_video_ gives_nypd_ black_eye_ 122136.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

harpooning?
Posted by: Katiii on Aug 1, 2008 5:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I reckon we should get in touch with Greenpeace who are avidly against the harpooning and deaths of whales, which are, admiittedly an endangered species, but I'm beginning to believe Americans are an endangered species as well, what's the difference between harpooning whales and harpooning humans? The size of the hook?
I'm so glad I live in New Zealand, but then again, they're trying to legalise the use of tasers here as well, the police say it will make their job so much easier, how come they've managed until now?
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]