Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

My First-Hand Experience With Government Spies

Posted by Dave Zirin, Huffington Post at 7:55 AM on July 21, 2008.


My Constitutionally protected dissent was monitored by the Feds.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

Finally, at long last, I have something in common with Muhammad Ali.

No, I'm not the heavyweight champion of the world, and haven't been named spokesperson for Raid bug spray. Like "the Greatest" - not to mention far too many others -- I have been a target of state police surveillance for activities -- in my case against the death penalty -- that were legal, non-violent, and, so we assumed, constitutionally protected. In classified reports compiled by the Maryland State Police and the Department of Homeland Security, I am "Dave Z." This nickname was given by an undercover agent known to us as "Lucy." She sat in our meetings of the Campaign to End the Death Penalty, smiling and engaged, taking copious notes about actions deemed threatening by the Governor of Maryland, Robert Ehrlich. Our seditious crimes, as Lucy reported, involved such acts as planning to set up a table at the local farmer's market and writing up a petition. Adding a dash of farce to this outrage, she was monitoring us in the liberal enclave of Takoma Park, Maryland, a place known more for vegans than violence, more for tie-dying than terrorism.

Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act and the ACLU, we now know that "Lucy" was only one part of a vast, insidious project. The Maryland State Police's Department of Homeland Security devoted near 300 hours and thousands of taxpayer dollars from 2005 and 2006 to harassing people whose only crime was dissenting on the question of the war in Iraq and Maryland's use of death row.

My dear friend Mike Stark, a board member of the Campaign to End the Death Penalty is at times referred to in "Lucy's" report as a "socialist" and an "anarchist." One can only assume this is the pathetic time honored tradition of reducing people to simple caricatures, all the better to garner Homeland Security grant money.

Veteran peace activist in Baltimore, Max Obuszewski, who initiated the suit, was as well consistently shadowed as he walked down the streets. His "primary crime" (their lingo) was entered into the homeland security database as "terrorism - anti govern(ment)." His "secondary crime" was listed as "terrorism -- anti-war protesters." The database is known as the Washington-Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area, or

HIDTA. Yes, a respected peace organizer of many decades standing is checked as a terrorist, his actions listed as criminal, for doing nothing more than exercising his rights. It boggles the mind.

Former police superintendent Tim Hutchins defended these totalitarian practices by saying, "You do what you think is best to protect the general populace of the state." (The article mentioned that Hutchins is now a federal defense contractor. I guess The Global War on Terror is just the gift that keeps on giving for the Hutchins family.)

But "protect the general populace" from what? The surveillance continued even after it was determined that we were planning nothing more dangerous that carrying clipboards in a public place. Hutchins and the Ehrlich administration have undertaken an ugly violation of our civil rights, manipulating fears of terrorism to stamp out dissent.

This is COINTELPRO pure and simple. Like the infamous counter-intelligence program whose heyday many assume was a relic the 1950s and 1960s, it's an effort to harass the innocent and breed paranoia, all for daring to question power.

Governor Ehrlich and Tim Hutchins stand in the legacy of those who hounded Martin Luther King, and facilitated the death of Malcolm X. They stand in the tradition of those who drove the great actor, college football superstar, and activist Paul Robeson toward The mental breakdown that claimed his life. When Robeson's files were opened under the Freedom of Information Act, the results were terrifying.

As his son, Paul Robeson Jr. has written, "From the files I received, it was obvious that there were agents who did nothing but follow every public event of my father, or even of me.... It took on a life of its own.... Over time, even for someone as powerful and with as many resources as my dad had...the attrition got to him."

Now Robeson is on a postage stamp. The moral midgets who destroyed him went unpunished. That's what has to change. The ACLU, to their credit, is going on the offensive.

As ACLU lawyer David Rocah said at a news conference in Baltimore on Thursday, "To invest this many hours investigating the most all-American of activities without any scintilla of evidence there is anything criminal going on is shocking. It's Kafkaesque."

Unfortunately for people like Gov. Ehrlich, it is also "the most All

American of activities" to take the constitution and use it as their personal hand wipe.

As the great political philosopher Ice T wrote, "Freedom of Speech.... just watch what you say." Well, now is exactly the time not to watch what we say. I'm angry. I'm angry for my friends, who trusted "Lucy" and others. I'm angry that my tax dollars went to paying the salaries of people who spy and intimidate those exercising their rights. I'm angry that Barack Obama just voted to increase the power of the Federal government to disrupt people's lives. And I'm angry enough that I'm joining a lawsuit initiated by the ACLU. "Homeland Security" picked on the wrong sports writer. They also picked on the wrong group of activists. We will not be silenced.

[People who want to express their outrage can contact the office of the current Governor Martin O'Malley. We should demand a full investigation of the MSP, public release of all documents obtained through this illegal activity, and a specific commitment that the anti-death penalty and anti-war movement will not be targeted. Call the office of the governor at 1-800-811-8336, or submit a comment online at http://www.governor.maryland.gov/mail/]


Continuous Police State: Hundreds of Demonstrators Detained at RNC
Cops detained hundreds demonstrators on the final night of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. September 5, 2008.
Media Silent, But Activist Groups Loud About RNC Police Brutality
"I observed a lot of instigation and escalation of violence [on the part of the police]," Flemming said.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. September 3, 2008.
Riot Cops Gas Docile Crowd Outside the RNC
It should be stressed that this wasn't a loud boisterous march like Monday's, but just a crowd of 100 people walking calmly down the street.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. September 3, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why Isn't This Shocking Anymore?
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Jul 21, 2008 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After seven years of Herr Bush and Uberfuhrer Cheney, this account should be shocking but it isn't. It's become the norm in our "homeland" (America Uber Alles).

Is there any way to curb the enthusiasm of the government -- state and federal -- in spying on American citizens doing nothing more sinister than exercising their Constitutional rights?

Oh, wait. Sorry. My apologies. We barely have a Constitution left any more.

Every day, I am handed another reason to weep for America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Commonplace
Posted by: QQOblivion on Jul 21, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of spying will only become more and more common as Bush's term nears an end, and continue beyond into the indefinite future. Better get used to it.
Going soon to any conventions? The government will, obviously, be watching you there too. Denver has just announced that they are putting up many many new surveillance cameras in the downtown area for the convention. And they will keep the cameras up permanently, long after the convention leaves town.
And with facial-recognition and gait-analysis, Big Brother will keep tabs on the individual protesters He is watching.

The surveillance won't stop at the conventions. And, as we know, it has been going on since BEFORE 9-11. Get used to it. Or better yet, do not get used to it. Getting used to it leads to acceptance of it, no matter how completely anti-American it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps the very most important point...
Posted by: lexicon on Jul 21, 2008 9:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As has been noted here and elsewhere, one of the problems with this sort of surveillance is it's fealty to an entirely passive and benign source of evil...the BENCHMARK-INDEXED BUDGET.

The budget is based in part on performance. The concept of "performance" is not nuanced or real, it is reduced to a simple, false, but easy to understand concept...such as quantified threat assessments. Problem is, what would be REAL and TRUE, are QUALIFIED threat assessments. But, the problem being, there are so very few "qualified threats".

...a handful a year, throughout the world. You should BE so lucky, as a homeland security operative, to ever see one come by your desk! They're like hen's teeth.

...So, qualified threats are useless, as a metric. We have to measure, though! So we go with quantified threats, and the more the better!

That's the first tyranny...an endemic, systemic characteristic that will always, ALWAYS up-size the bureaucracy, instead of RIGHT-SIZING it.

And there's a second, "most important point".

Databases.

Specifically, Government databases.

I have worked on government databases. I know something interesting about them. Quite often, certain information fields are not free-form fields...only certain specific values may be entered into them, because those fields are used to index and search the records, or those fields drive certain specific interface behavior...and other reasons.

these are called "constrained values". Take the "subject type" field...what type of contact was made with the subject?

Another thing that government databases do, a holdover from the age of expensive data storage, is that they'll often OVERLOAD a type field to serve a dual purpose.

So, we have a data field, "subject type" which is made to function as a combination of the Investigation type, and the subject's role in that investigation...hence, we see a value for such a person as being, "Terrorism: anti-war activities"...which, in the database, is to mean, "in the course of a terrorism investigation, the subject was identified as being involved in anti-war activities.

So, that's fine, right? In THE ORIGINAL RECORDING SYSTEM, the field had a specific dual-purpose meaning, that made sense.

But, the problem comes in when that ORIGINAL MEANING is lost...such as when that data is transferred to another database somewhere.

Now, when data transfers between databases, particularly government databases, the data fields in the second system may not be the same. So the data fields get mapped, as closely as possible, often by abstract computer analysts who wallow in the arcane...and so our "combination investigation type/subject role type" gets mapped to the new field, the "suspect type" field, where the previous nuance of data meaning gets lost.

Then let's imagine that the SECOND database gets mapped yet again up to the feds...and that "suspect type" field, gets mapped to the "threat type" field.

Add to this, that at each step along the way, the range of values that the operative can select, are rather narrow. In the original system, the operator had to choose a value for the investigation type and suspect type that best matched the actual activity. No value was a particularly good match, but SOME value had to be selected. And in the mind of a law enforcement operative, they WILL NOT choose the "closest benign value"...they WILL choose the closest value on the higher side".

And that will happen all the way up the chain, until the 'suspect' who started out as "neighbor of an antiwar activist", becomes "suspected terrorist accomplice".

Now, these machinations are not carried out with malice, they just tend to happen that way.

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Insightful Posted by: benzene
» Insightful indeed... Posted by: CanuckKid
Always shocking, but there's a long history
Posted by: CJC on Jul 21, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wouldn't want to let the Bushies off the hook in any way, but this kind of surveillance of free-thinking Americans has a long history.
Paul Robeson, indeed.
J Edgar Hoover was a master.

The Nixon administration loved to harass dissidents. I know two people, who did not know each other, who had their dwellings ransacked by
"white men in trench coats." One was in Chicago about 1973, another in Cambridge, MA in the early 80's. In both cases all that was "stolen" was a camera.

Why can't we put a permanent stop to this harassment of citizens who refuse to follow some party line?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And "Lucy"'s real name is?
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jul 21, 2008 10:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely this should be made public, along with the names of any other "surveillance" operatives involved in the offense.

It's called personal responsibility, a good old CONSERVATIVE value that actually makes a lot of sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Conservative???" Posted by: luckypuck
interesting address
Posted by: Dboy on Jul 21, 2008 10:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
she was monitoring us in the liberal enclave of Takoma Park, Maryland, a place known more for vegans than violence, more for tie-dying than terrorism.

NSA HQ is just up the road from Tacoma Park. Should hardly be surprising that anything less that rapid nazism would be considered suspicious there. I recommend finding a better place to live.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First You've Got to Get Mad... I Want All of You to Get Up Out of Your Chairs
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Jul 21, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Open a Window...
And Yell Out, "I'm as Mad as Hell and I'm Not Going to Take This Anymore!!!"


It's all about business, the police, the courts, homeland illusion of security, they are all a business.

The more suspected terrorists there are, the more they can increase their budgets, the more the police and FBI can get time and a half overtime or double time. It's all a business and the people employed in these fields are there for one main reason, money.


It is time for some layoffs and firings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do we even have a Constitution?
Posted by: Reader11722 on Jul 21, 2008 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all about the First Amendment. After all, censorship is becoming America's favorite past-time. The US gov't (and their corporate friends), already detain protesters, ban books like "America Deceived" America Deceived (book) from Amazon and shut down Ron Paul. Free Speech forever, especially for dissent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Adams--Speaking Out for what is right for America
Posted by: COACH0006 on Jul 21, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I strongly suggest that everyone rent the DVD "John Adams" to regain a true focus of what our Constutition is all about. To remain silent is to agree with what has and is happening to "OUR" Constitition today. Our forefathers put their very lives on the line to draft the Constitution and to fight against the British for Freedom. We can do no less than speak out against those in Washington who seek to take our God given Rights by slowly chipping away at our basic Rights of Freedom of Speech, Freedom of peaceful assembly, of self Protection of our homes and family.
We must not falter in our beliefs by remaining silent.......Speak out.....Contact your Senator and Reprsentative and voice your opinion loudly........."Do not go Silently into the night".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Forum
Posted by: blackie4aces on Jul 21, 2008 3:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The funny thing is, real sleeper terrorists or genuine anarchists would never associate themselves with high profile protest movements. Although the police and many politicians are stupid beyond belief, even they are not so challenged as to not appreciate this. That said, one can only draw the conclusion that all this bullshit had nothing to do with terrorism whatsoever, but was simply a method of discouraging dissent, i.e. depriving citizens of their constitutional rights and, some might say, duty.

A mistake too many of us make in our reaction to these outrages is that we sometimes are prey to the false assumption that all, or overwelmingly most, Americans understand, appreciate, and desire the freedoms and rights provided for by our constitution. This is simply not true. There are significant numbers of individuals sitting in a variety of catbird seats that would like nothing more than for the constitution to go away and that takes in a very large percentage of cops, the very people who are charged to enforce the law. That those enforcing the laws of this nation have little or no respect for the constitutional law that underpins the whole circus is always reason to worry. It only gets much worse when the desperado asshole in the White House and his compliant flunkies in Congress are writng and passing laws that negate the liberty and indiviual rights we were guaranteed under the constitution. There is no recourse when that happens. And, believe it or not, there's still a lot of people cheering them on.

This is seriously bad shit, folks. Real bad. Get used to "Free Speech Zones" and get used to them getting farther and fewer between. There was a time when all of America considered itself a "Free Speech Zone." That was what the First Amendment was all about. Now your First Amendment rights can only be exercised in a restricted area designated by the ruling junta-we must have security, you understand. Or in a major newspaper any time you'd like--if you own a major newspaper or a TeeVee station. Somebody may be reading this thread right now to ferret out people who have the dangerous idea that they are free, have rights, and ain't too happy about the ways things are going.

My guess is none of this is going to change, certainly not as a result of anything the uttter craven whores in Congress might do, until about two to three million motherfuckers hit the streets and create their own goddam "Free Speech Zone." How bad it will have to get before that happens, if it ever does, is anybody's guess, because the people in America are afraid of their own government, not the other way around as it should be.

Comments Welcome

Satan's Neutral Corner
satansneutralcorner@yahoo.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Constitutional Rights?
Posted by: dougo on Jul 22, 2008 5:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You have the right to remain silent. We will water-board you for the answer we want to hear. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. No sorry,you have a military tribunal,or to make it easy for you, a kangaroo court. You have the right to speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. Say anything you want in complete confidence knowing we are recording your conversation.If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be provided for you at government expense. He works at the pleasure of the President and if the results are not what the President wants,you'll both be disappeared.Quick,enter your plea or he may wave the wand of terrorism and poof,you're an enemy combatant. Bush has been wiping his ass with what remains of a constitution since day one.He is drunk on power and can't stop his reign of terror and destruction on the American people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The abuses you EXPORT...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 22, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... are hard to refute when they're IMPORTED HOME...


you reap what you sow.

Stand up now, while you can.


┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice" ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Orwell's presient future
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jul 22, 2008 10:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"This is COINTELPRO pure and simple." What I don't understand is, as long as this was directed at "the African-American" community no one wanted to tackle it. As soon as white people realize that this is being aimed at them there is a problem.

Don't get me wrong - it's all wrong. Under this fascist administration the heightening of fear has been raised to new levels. And under the "pretenses" of Homeland Security many abuses have occurred the likes of which we still don't know. This is exactly what the framers of the Constitution & Bill of Rights faced and why they wrote out what they wanted to guard against!!

And yet, we have allowed these bullies to rape us (yes rape) of our right to dissent, to voice anything other than what they would have us to believe! Please tell me why, they should not all be IMPEACHED for High Crimes and Misdemeanors!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homeland Security's Motivation in Spying
Posted by: Urgelt on Jul 23, 2008 11:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't see a lot of discouraging of activists going on. They're just patiently filling in their data bases with absolutely anyone they can identify as dissenting with them. Why do they bother?

I have this same question about J. Edgar Hoover's COINTELPRO surveillance. Where did he expect it to lead? They spied. They made files. Warehouses and warehouse of files. They no doubt poured over each one looking for genuine dangers. Found the Weathermen - a teensy group of radicals (who wanted publicity, so they were kind of hard not to notice - and not much else. Did they really need to keep track of Hollywood script writers and LA Times journalists and Sierra Club advocates for protecting more parklands? What did Hoover want to do, but could not then get political backing to do?

If you read up on Hoover, the answer sort of pops out. He was an authoritarian of the first stripe. He was deeply offended by war protests breaking out all across the nation and by dissent at the Democratic Convention in Chicago, 1968. He wanted to take all of those unpatriotic rabble-rousers and lock them up en masse. His political masters would not let him go that far.

That was back when mainstream media did more or less serious journalism. That was before the neocons grabbed power through election-tampering in what can only be defined as a coup. That was before we got a President who thinks the Constitution is "just an old piece of paper." In Hoover's day, the time was not yet ripe.

I tell you, when I first read about the "emergency internment camps" built by Halliburton, and the contract to run them signed last year with Blackwater, my blood ran cold. Hundreds of thousands of beds. There aren't hundreds of thousands of terrorists. Who are those beds for?

Homeland Security spies on activists. Any activists who are putting out a message the Government does not want to hear. Each activist they spy on gets rated - it's obviously not a "threat" rating, these people are not bomb-throwers, so call it a "nuisance rating." They know how many beds they have to fill in an emergency. Filling them will be as simple as punching a button, and the arrest orders will go out. Everyone in law enforcement is programmed to obey in an emergency, no questions asked.

You think they can't do it? You forget who gets to define "enemy combatant."

Maybe it won't happen before Bush leaves office (if he leaves). Maybe they'll decide the time is not yet "ripe" to assert a full totalitarian take-over and sweep up organized dissenters. But they've planted the seeds, built the infrastructure, politicized Justice with partisans, passed laws granting the Executive amazing powers at odds with democratic principles, stacked the Supremes, taken over huge chunks of mainstream media, intimidated or bribed the Democrats in Congress into helpless capitulation. All they need to do now is manufacture an emergency. Easily done - attack Iran.

If China dumps its dollars on the world market, or Saudi Arabia decides to value oil in Euros, that would do it, too. Instant melt-down of the American economy.

A very great deal may ride on exactly what sort of man Obama really is. His sharp turn to the right after clinching the nomination, and his endorsement of amazing powers for the President in the new FISA law, does not give me much hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LIKE IT OR NOT REPUBLICANS DO NOT BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY. THEY ADMIT
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 24, 2008 6:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it when they say that we live in a republic. They mean that rather than a democracy. Any one that expresses any doubts about the primacy of democracy is unpatriotic.

Remember, republicans are your enemy. They are enablers. They, like those that enable druggies or alcoholics, enable the right wing nuts that would enslave us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]