Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
FISA, Compromised
By Brian Buetler
After Democrats stood their ground and refused to pass a series of draconian FISA amendments in February, negotiations over the wiretapping law went behind closed doors. In the months since then, news reports have occasionally suggested that another Democratic party sell-out was imminent, only to be superseded by other reports indicating that negotiations were ongoing. Until today.
A few moments ago, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer released what he refers to as a "bipartisan" "compromise" bill: The FISA Amendment Act of 2008, which he authored along with Jay Rockefeller, Kit Bond, and Roy Blunt (respectively, the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Intelligence committee, and the House Minority whip). The word "bipartisan" is technically indisputable. The word "compromise", by contrast, is a total farce.
The most controversial elements of the February legislation were provisions that would have allowed the White House to wiretap American citizens without a warrant, and that would have immunized telecommunications companies from participating in the NSA's warrantless wiretapping program back in the halcyon days when warrantless wiretapping was unquestionably illegal.
Here's how the new bill deals with the immunity question.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a civil action may not lie or be maintained in a Federal or State court against any person for providing assistance to an element of the intelligence community, and shall be promptly dismissed, if the Attorney General certifies to the district court of the United States in which such action is pending that...the assistance alleged to have been provided by the electronic communication service provider was in connection with an intelligence activity involving communications that was authorized by the President during the period beginning on September 11, 2001, and ending on January 17, 2007.That's the game. Non-profit groups like the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation can sue the telecoms if they want, but if Attorney General Michael Mukasey says "presto", the lawsuits must be dismissed.
| Also in Rights and Liberties | |||
| Tiny Michigan Town Tells Liz Cheney to Take her Fearmongering Elsewhere Someplace where they're all wusses. Post by BarbinMD. November 21, 2009. |
Utah Lawmaker: I Don't Mind "the Gays," but "I Don’t Want ‘Em Stuffing it Down My Throat all the Time" "Certainly not in my kid's face." Post by Zaid Jilani. November 20, 2009. |
Krauthammer Commits Terrorist Act on the Opinion Pages of the Washington Post Terrorists terrorize -- it's what they do. Post by Joshua Holland. November 20, 2009. |
|
EMAIL
PRINT
73 COMMENTS
PERMALINK