Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Mildred Loving Passes Away

Posted by Pam Spaulding, Pam's House Blend at 5:36 AM on May 6, 2008.


Mildred Loving, who challenged a Virginia ban on interracial marriage, has died.
loving

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Also in PEEK

Students Win Free Expression Case Against School
Alex Blaze The Bilerico Project

More Spying, Fewer Results
Mustang Bobby Shakesville

The Horror of "Honor Killings"
PZ Myers Pharyngula

Those of us eagerly waiting for the day when same-sex marriage is finally legalized across the land owe a debt of gratitude to Mildred Loving, whose 1967 case (Loving v. Virginia) resulted in a landmark Supreme Court decision that broke down a major social and legal barrier - interracial marriage.

Mildred Loving, a black woman whose challenge to Virginia's ban on interracial marriage led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling striking down such laws nationwide, has died, her daughter said Monday.

Peggy Fortune said Loving, 68, died Friday at her home in rural Milford. She did not disclose the cause of death.

...Richard Loving died in 1975 in a car accident that also injured his wife.

In a rare interview with The Associated Press last June, Loving said she wasn't trying to change history - she was just a girl who once fell in love with a boy.

"It wasn't my doing," Loving said. "It was God's work."

You'll recall that I asked U.S. Senate candidate Kay Hagan about Loving v. Virginia and the conundrum it presents when considering marriage equality for lesbian and gay couples:

During a Feb. 25 forum at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, you conveyed to attendees that the definition of marriage should be left up to state law. - How is that reconciled with 1967's Loving v. Virginia, a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that invalidated state bans on interracial marriages? Should that have been left a state matter?

I never did receive a response to this specific question.

As you may also recall, neither Dem gubernatorial candidate (Moore, Perdue) bothered to respond in their live blogs to questions about a potential marriage amendment in this state, the legality of which will eventually end up before SCOTUS because of a patchwork of unequal laws, similar to the anti-miscegenation laws prior to 1967's ruling.


Students Win Free Expression Case Against School
A judge ruled that the school could not prevent students from wearing gay pride gear.
Post by Alex Blaze. May 14, 2008.
More Spying, Fewer Results
After expanding surveillance powers and compromising civil liberties at home, the government has little to show for its efforts.
Post by Mustang Bobby. May 13, 2008.
The Horror of "Honor Killings"
A young women in Iraq is murdered by her father. Her only crime - talking to a British soldier.
Post by PZ Myers. May 12, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation
Posted by: neilemac on May 6, 2008 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Canada's past Prime Minster, Pierre Elliot Trudeau voiced the following when he was the Justice Minister in the Federal Liberal Government before he succeeded our Nobel Peace Prize winner Lester B Pearson as head of the party to become PM himself in the next election.
'There's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation'

Peace in all dimensions, pleas welcomed!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]