Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

NC Robo-Call Investigation Broadens - NAACP Files Complaint

Posted by Pam Spaulding, Pam's House Blend at 11:32 AM on May 5, 2008.


The North Carolina NAACP has filed a complaint of voter suppression against Women's Voices, Women Vote.
robocalls

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Election 2008 in your
mailbox!

 

Also in Election 2008

Students Win Free Expression Case Against School
Alex Blaze The Bilerico Project

More Spying, Fewer Results
Mustang Bobby Shakesville

The Horror of "Honor Killings"
PZ Myers Pharyngula

As I said last Tuesday, "Stop messing with my primary!" and "All I know is that this better not be connected to the Clinton campaign." That was a desperate wish for it to be some right-wing scheme to suppress votes. You just don't want to deal with an internal problem of this nature.

I posted the above statements before it was revealed by Facing South's investigation that the source of the misleading and illegal robo-calls in NC was the progressive DC non-profit Women's Voices Women Vote. It's still not clear what on earth really went on, but WVWV has been on a swift offensive to dispel any suggestion that there was purposeful deception.

Be that as it may, the NC attorney general is investigating, and over the weekend, Sue Sturgis of Facing South reported that the NC NAACP filed a complaint against WVWV.

The North Carolina NAACP has filed a formal complaint of possible voter suppression against Women's Voices Women Vote, the D.C. nonprofit that as we revealed earlier this week was behind the deceptive and illegal robo-calls made to state residents. The N.C. NAACP hand-delivered its complaint today to state Attorney General Roy Cooper and State Board of Elections Executive Director Gary Bartlett. It's also alerted the U.S. Department of Justice that it's collecting more information from its national network and is contemplating filing a formal complaint with that agency.

N.C. NAACP President Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II (center in photo) announced the filing of the complaint at a press conference held this afternoon outside the N.C. Department of Justice. He was joined by his group's attorney, Al McSurely (left), and Bob Hall (right) of Democracy North Carolina. The state Attorney General's office is already investigating Women's Voices, but the N.C. NAACP and Democracy North Carolina want to be parties to that investigation.

"When you mess with the right to vote, you're messing with everything that is fundamental in our democracy," Barber said.

Here is the full text of the very detailed complaint, which recounts the facts at hand. Another serious aspect of this topic is below the fold.

There has been a strong progressive defense of the actions of WVWV. What seems to be difficult to swallow is that an organization has, like it or not, engaged in the illegal robo-calls in multiple states that affect a specific slice of potential voters. And as Facing South pointed out, in North Carolina, it occurred yet again. An unknown number of low-information minority voters are left confused, and possibly deterred, from voting, whether or not it was ineptitude by the organization.

We should hold our organizations to an extremely high standard. Blacks (and whites) died to ensure that blacks had right to vote in the South; the call for further public investigation is both necessary and relevant to 1) get to the bottom of the illegal calls and 2) reassure voters that this cannot happen again. I don't care who is on the board or running the org, or how much good work was/is being done by WVWV in other arenas, if this were a Republican-run organization, we'd be tearing it to shreds.

If silence on this for "the good of the party" is more important than investigating a illegal practice affecting an individual's right to vote (on purpose or repeatedly by mistake), it's a sad state of affairs. Just because the Republicans do it more, or have a more systematic interest in doing it doesn't change the fact that this was wrong on so many levels -- and airing dirty laundry is the least of the issues in my mind. Apologies are meaningful, but given the spotty history of WVWV robo-calls, there is a stench still in the air, and that's why the investigation is moving forward.

There seems to be an undercurrent out there that registering more voters, particularly single, low-information women of all colors using illegal methods multiple times (why didn't WVWV care enough about its rep to clean up its "administrative problems" after so many official red flags?) is worth the potential result of confusing an unknown number other, low-information voters in a way that could deter them from voting.

WVWV could have as an emergency corrective measure, embarked on a second set of robo-calls to inform those voters that they received incorrect or confusing information; that seems like a logical thing to do. The action taken, to try to stop the mailing of the registration packets, does little to directly inform call recipients waiting for those packets to arrive to fill them out and send back before voting.

Chris Kromm and the Institute for Southern Studies dove into investigating this robo-call not knowing what they would find. ISS continued to dig regardless of the organization and made those results public. When wagon-circling occurs because of bruised egos on our side takes precedence over focusing on those targeted by the robo-calls, many belonging to a demographic historically disenfranchised time and again, it's problematic. If we're going to say every vote must count, then we have to mean it.

What I fear most is that this WVWV debacle will unravel into a feminist vs. black issue (the underlying assumption that it is also a Clinton-supporter vs. Obama-supporter issue). The left has such discomfort dealing with color-arousal or race matters (not racism, mind you, since that word is nuclear), that it will largely go undiscussed because of fear of getting shocked by the third rail. Sometimes naming the unmentionable tension can clear the air, but it requires cool heads. We're in a world of intertubes hotheads on all sides of the equation, with raw nerves exposed.

The bottom line is to take responsibility, clean house, move forward. Sunlight is the best disinfectant -- on the left and the right.


Students Win Free Expression Case Against School
A judge ruled that the school could not prevent students from wearing gay pride gear.
Post by Alex Blaze. May 14, 2008.
More Spying, Fewer Results
After expanding surveillance powers and compromising civil liberties at home, the government has little to show for its efforts.
Post by Mustang Bobby. May 13, 2008.
The Horror of "Honor Killings"
A young women in Iraq is murdered by her father. Her only crime - talking to a British soldier.
Post by PZ Myers. May 12, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Appropriate recourse...and correction?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on May 5, 2008 2:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The blog entry incorrectly states the NC NAACP complaint recounts the facts of the case. It merely sketches them, one supposes in order to lower the threshold for their "low-information" constituency (their words, not mine).

My understanding of the complaint, after hearing the call and orienting myself with the facts thus far, is that, for "low-information" potential voters, a robo call was placed in close in temporal proximity to the pre-election primarycaucusthing that democrats are still engaged in, and someone who hadn't taken the time to find when and where to vote could be left with an understanding that they should await a packet in the mail, instead of determining their civic duty by reading the paper, listening to the radio, watching the news, calling their secretary of state, or calling or visiting their county clerk or registrar of voters or other "highly informed" options available to all of our 300M citizens to find out where and when to cast a ballot.

What is unclear to me is whether this was part of a campaign to register voters for the general election, whether this was done specifically and maliciously to target primary voters, or whether it was done negligently in a way that specifically targets "low information" types, as NC NAACP represents their following.

For unregistered voters, filling out the packets and mailing it in would make these folks elgible to vote in the general election, once the party-choosey-thing called "primary/caucus season" is over. Indeed, the call I listened to from an apparently fictitious cat named Lamont made no reference to a "primary", leading my lowly-informed self to conclude this call was targeting unregistered voters. So, their obvious defense is that they were doing what their charter indicates they try and do, which was trying to register voters for an election, and that the party-politician-picking shenanigans happened to coincide with their national registration efforts. I could be wrong...in which case, we get to appropriate recourse:

If that constitues negligent "voter suppression", what do you do? Fire the chair, fire the most senior person(s) who approved the time table, and fine the organization into oblivion?

If it was maliciously done, you could make a powerful enough argument for sending a bunch of the people in this...umm...malicious voter-registration advocacy group up the river, and then fining their organization into oblivion.

I think the outcome will be interesting: if they were indeed gearing up to help people vote in federal elections, and end up in sufficiently hot water because democrats are having a hard time doing electoral math (aside: hmm, does that place Mrs. Clinton in the "low-information" category), then it is quite probable the result will be...(wait for it)...

...suppression of voter registration groups, who may not have a sufficient staff to ensure they do not conflict with party events when trying to get information and registration materials to voters.

Yes, I suspect this will be interesting, in a Rev. Wright/Sniper Fire "important issues" scandal detached sort of way, unless someone can demonstrate criminal neglect or intent.

Bonus: what I'd really like know, considering that we are all generally creatures of habit, is whether they adhered to a similar robo-calling blitz as they had in prior election cycles, in which the parties of Money and Power had already usually picked their chosen son.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WVWV couldn't possibly be supporting Hillary, could they?
Posted by: Quannah on May 6, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is appalling. It isn't a coincidence that these robo-calls go out right before the primary in North Carolina! That they are simply trying to get people to register to vote in the GENERAL election sounds like a convenient excuse. What the hell is wrong with progressive groups copying the worst of the Republic's strategies in this election? (Especially Hillary and her campaign & supporters)

I guess both sides learned from the last two presidential elections that "all's fair in love and politics." We're no better than the other side if we choose to co-opt their dirty tactics in order to win-at-all-costs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]