Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pentagon Releases '03 Memo Giving Green Light to Torture

Posted by Brad , Sadly, No! at 7:43 AM on April 2, 2008.


In other words, torture is only torture when the torturer feels guilty about doing it afterwards.
yoo
Yoo

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 


WTF?

The Justice Department sent a legal memorandum to the Pentagon in 2003 asserting that federal laws prohibiting assault, maiming and other crimes did not apply to military interrogators who questioned al-Qaeda captives because the president’s ultimate authority as commander in chief overrode such statutes. […]
“If a government defendant were to harm an enemy combatant during an interrogation in a manner that might arguably violate a criminal prohibition, he would be doing so in order to prevent further attacks on the United States by the al Qaeda terrorist network,” Yoo wrote. “In that case, we believe that he could argue that the executive branch’s constitutional authority to protect the nation from attack justified his actions.”
Interrogators who harmed a prisoner would be protected by a “national and international version of the right to self-defense,” Yoo wrote. He also articulated a definition of illegal conduct in interrogations — that it must “shock the conscience” — that the Bush administration advocated for years.
“Whether conduct is conscience-shocking turns in part on whether it is without any justification,” Yoo wrote, explaining, for example, that it would have to be inspired by malice or sadism before it could be prosecuted.

In other words, torture is only torture when the torturer feels guilty about doing it afterward.

Which assures that the only people who will ever be prosecuted for torture are the whistle-blowers.

Joseph Heller had no idea how crazy this shit could get. Jesus H.

acanthuslsmall.jpgacanthussmall.jpg

Gavin adds: Well, not just whistle-blowers. That definition of torture also allows for the prosecution of ‘bad apples,’* as with the Abu Ghraib affair. Naturally, their superiors would be unmaliciously managing paperwork and personnel matters as the blood and excrement spattered the cell walls.


Kinda reminds you of something, doesn’t it?

* Species name: Malice domestica

Digg!

Tagged as: torture, pentagon, bush administration, yoo

Brad is a regular blogger for Sadly No!.


For the Record, I'm No Holocaust "Skeptic"
According to the logic of some, it's a debatable point.
Post by Joshua Holland. December 24, 2009.
Commander Changes Tune, Says He Won't Court-Martial, Jail Pregnant Soldiers
But he also has no plans to expand soldiers' access to emergency contraception (Plan B).
Post by Amanda Terkel. December 23, 2009.
Cop Pulls Gun During Snowball Fight ... Could it Have Been 'Roid Rage'?
Wigged out cops on steroids is as frightening as one could imagine.
Post by Joshua Holland. December 21, 2009.
Advertisement
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?