Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Will There Ever Be Justice for Halliburton Rape Victim Jamie Leigh Jones?

Posted by Attaturk, Firedoglake at 8:40 AM on March 6, 2008.


I would sure like to know what the three surviving Presidential candidates think of this.

A month ago, I wrote about a former female Halliburton/KBR employee who was forced to arbitrate a legal claim of sexual assault and sexual harassment that occurred in Iraq, rather than having a public trial before a jury.

Well, one month later, it may happen again:

In a federal lawsuit, Jamie Leigh Jones says she was drugged, raped and held against her will in a storage locker while working for KBR Inc., then a subsidiary of Halliburton Co., in 2005.

As part of her employment, Jones agreed to settle claims against the company in arbitration. But she never imagined such claims would include being imprisoned in a storage locker, said one of her attorneys, L. Todd Kelly.

Attorneys for Halliburton and KBR argued that the contract Jones signed binds her to settle all claims -- including claims of sexual assault -- against her former employer through arbitration.

Halliburton attorney W. Carl Jordan said that because the purported attack is said to have happened in Halliburton-provided barracks, it ties any claims Jones makes to her employment.

Can you imagine that last paragraph being explained in a company sexual harassment seminar?

"Now folks, we're not encouraging you to commit sexual assault but if you do, please have the deceny to do so on company premises"

Almost all of the millions of newly hired employees who have these arbitration agreements had them stuck under their noses on the first day they started their jobs. At a time they are most susceptible to pressure to sign off on unfavorable agreements. Quite often these clauses are buried within cumbersome 'employee handbooks' they get no substantial time to review. When that signature occurs, the employee has given over substantial control their Right for redressing wrongs to the party legally responsible should any wrong occur.

I would sure like to know what the three surviving Presidential candidates think of this. After all they represent three major categories of those who suffer discrimination in employment. But I guess that would require journalism that focuses on policies and ideology, as opposed to reporting the "horserace" or how they grilled food for their press corps buddies.

Once again, it's a great system for corporations -- recognized as a person under the law -- just like you. Only better.

Do our prospective Presidents agree?

Digg!

Tagged as: jones, halliburton, iraq, rape, justice system

Attaturk is a regular blogger for FireDogLake


MoveOn.org, ColorOfChange.org and NAS to Protest FOX's Racism in NYC
ColorOfChange.org and MoveOn.org Members To Deliver More Than 600,000 petition signatures to FOX headquarters in Manhattan.
Post by AlterNet Staff. July 22, 2008.
Dead Black Man Was Tasered Nine Times by White Cop
Who happens to like using his Taser quite a bit.
Post by Steven D.. July 22, 2008.
Conservatives Want Bush to Issue "Pre-Emptive Pardons" to Officials Involved in Illegal Programs
These are lawyers with little respect for the rule of law.
Post by Ben. July 22, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
how is this possible?
Posted by: voicefromafar on Mar 6, 2008 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't there a legal distinction between the kinds of "claims" an employee might file against an employer and these types of crimes? Thank the Universe for karma - at least. In the mean time, I think this woman should do something similar to Cindy Sheehan, go to the court of public theater, if she can afford to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: how is this possible? Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: how is this possible? Posted by: EncinoM
Private property transforms felony crimes into employer/employee "disputes!"
Posted by: luzmejor on Mar 6, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And private armies like Blackwater can do whatever they like in Bush's new smash-grab-and-go era because they are part of "Homeland Security."

You see, changing dictionary definitions means that not loving his new mercenary troops is now a crime like treason and females who expect to be treated like employees instead of free prostitutes are traitors to their country.

What else could we have expected from a president who thinks that robbing and destroying entire nations is the proper definition of "liberating" them. And besides, our wanna-be-famous president assumes killing helpless people is really something that Jesus would have wanted us to do.
So there!! Did you see that little victory dance on TV last night? It was a caricature of the local lush who suddenly won the national lottery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our civil liberties and human rights have been sold off to the highest bidder.
Posted by: bettina9292 on Mar 6, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Capitalism above all else. In dollar we trust. The human rights we have been afforded have been stripped away bit by bit by legal precedents such as "tort" reform druing the last eight years. Years ago the right wing primary stated agenda was to take a way all of the new amendments to the constitution since 1900 and to eliminate these through the appointment of conservative Supreme Court Justices who would slowly vote on cases that mold other opinions in lower court that subtlety created a trickle down effect on all other legal issues and change the ways in which laws protect us. It is the right wings belief that all people should fend for themselves in a dog eat dog, survivor of the fittest America. Courts are establishing that , the human being has little actual dollar worth, pain and suffering cost to much to put a price tag on as in the large tobacco suits, suffering is by definition undefinable such as "waterboarding", privacy is undefinable , as in wire tapping. Or what is perceived as dangerous threat to self is justifiable if you are defending your home and you have a gun, but not if you are claiming product liability and you own a defective product. Justice is weighed in this way. If you have the loudest voice with the biggest power and money then you will win. This is the capitalist model , not a democratic model. The human individual is non-existent. This poor woman is just a symbol of what has happened to all of our human rights in America today. Make an employee contract with the Devil (Haliburton)and the Devil will take your soul and your body. In the capitalist vision, receiving money for your job is the only thing that any business is required to do. Fair wages job safety and absence of sexual harassment are human rights that just interfere with making a profit. Sad and very sickening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Justice? No. Even? More than likely.
Posted by: Graphictruth on Mar 6, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As another commenter titles it - "Thank God for Karma."

This whole thing strikes me as utterly freakin' bizarre. It's like taking out a front page ad in the New York Times that says: "Blackwater: Would you trust us with YOUR daughter?"

Blackwater is in a business that requires a standard of trust most businesses never have to contemplate - and their performance suggests that you would do better hiring a bunch of bangers from south-central LA.

They would clearly have higher professional standards - and certainly more guts, since Blackwater is clearly running scared of a small blonde woman with a devastating pout.

For a paramilitary organization to deny accountability in a case where they are CLEARLY and obviously accountable makes one wonder what else they are avoiding accountability for.

When I put myself in the place of the sort of clients Blackwater courts, I would be extremely skeptical of their ability to really cope properly with an emergent situation. You see, whatever other factors exist, there is one thing I know: they have an institutional response that goes directly toward covering their own asses.

Even if it means tossing away one of their own.

Any unit that does that is unworthy of being paid to cover MY ass. And any unit too stupid and corrupt to have figured that out is too fucking stupid to be anything other than target practice for a professional op force.

I giggle thinking to what degree Blackwater must be penetrated by... well, any half-competent Intel force that has a spare muscle-head on the payroll. You know, someone visibly not quite smart enough to do something more challenging.

And that would mean that all the details a professional outfit would keep confidential is basicly old news.

Interestingly enough, Blackwater provides security to many command-level persons in Iraq, a slot that would be traditionally given to old, wise, cynical and zipper-lipped Marines.

I wonder how that has affected operational security in theater.

Of course, it makes one wonder what's going on that they wouldn't consider shocking the tender sensibilities of a Marine security detail.

Ethics have practical, real-world implications, consequences and outcomes, whether or not there's any action under cover of law.

Bob King: Graphictruth.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

disturbing commentary at the Houston Chronicle
Posted by: wagadog on Mar 6, 2008 5:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Houston Chronicle has some heated debate, but more at the Archie v Meathead level, unfortunately.

I thought those attitudes died in Arkansas when HRC was "fighting" for the women and children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]