Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Clarence Thomas: Silent in Supreme Court Since 2006

Posted by Kemp Muniz, The "Bush"-Whacked Administration at 4:30 PM on February 26, 2008.


It's been more than two years -- and 142 cases -- since SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas asked a question from the bench.
clarencethomas

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

If a Supreme Court Justice doesn't say a word in court, do they matter?

It's been two years, and 142 cases, since SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas has said anything during oral arguments.

Every other Justice has asked questions, a lot of questions at that, but Thomas hasn't.

He doesn't ask questions … sure, he might lean to his right (in more ways than one) to share a comment or a laugh with Justice Breyer, but other than that -- he's as silent as Marcel Marceau.

The last time Justice Thomas asked a question in court was February 22, 2006 during a death penalty case out of South Carolina, but ever since then it's been deafening silence on a plethora of cases that have been heard and dissected by the other Justices on the court, including "newbies" John Roberts and Samuel (Sc)Alito.

Not Thomas though. He's been as silent on the bench as he was during his troubled confirmation amid allegations thrown at him by Anita Hill.

Granted, this isn't new news as he broached his reticence on the bench in his autobiography, My Grandfather's Son when he wrote that questions may be helpful to the others but not to him (yeah, heaven forbid you try to get more information before making an informed decision).

And once, while speaking to the Federalist Society he said; "One thing I've demonstrated often in 16 years is you can do this job without asking a single question." Actually, I think you mean you can "hold this job without asking a single question" … because I certainly don't think you're doing this job.

This is coming up again because, with the Court in session, questions are being asked by the Justices … except, of course, for Thomas.

I am not an attorney, but what I don't understand is how a judge, any judge, would be able to make an informed legal decision without asking questions.

Am I oversimplifying things? Am I making too much out of his silence?

I think, and remember this is only MY opinion, his silence speaks volumes about him … not only as a Justice, but as a person as well. If you don't ask questions, you may be misinterpreting something, or you might have heard something incorrectly. Asking questions helps clear things up and gives more insight into the situation at hand.

But what do I know … I mean, I knew that Justice was blind, but I never knew that it was mute as well.

This post also appears on Daily Kos here.

Digg!

Tagged as: scotus, clarence thomas


U.S. Security Firm Indicted for Fraud in Afghanistan
The company, called U.S. Protection and Investigation, is accused of getting paid "inflated" amounts for its work on behalf of USAID.
Post by Bernard Hibbitts. October 6, 2008.
Conservatives Attack Google for Opposing Gay Marriage Ban
Randy Thomasson of the right-wing group Campaign for Children and Families (CCF) has called for a boycott of Google for its opposition to Prop 8.
Post by Amanda Terkel. October 3, 2008.
DNC Police T-Shirt:'We Get Up Early to Beat the Crowds'
Talk about bad taste.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. October 2, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
ya get what ya pay for
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Feb 27, 2008 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
an old tired, beaten down rich man who doesn't give a damn about his job

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fire Thomas
Posted by: JSquercia on Feb 27, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've always said fire Thomas and give Scalia two votes since thomas always votes with Scalia . At least we save ourselves his salary

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gee...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Feb 27, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can do this job without having to ask any questions, eh? Yep... and I could do my job by doing the bare minimum, as well. The difference is, of course, I'm not appointed for life... so half-assing my job... a FAR less important job just wouldn't cut it.

It seems like justice Thomas just figured out how little real work he has to do... and is musing over this amazing discovery of how much he can really just sit around and stare at the ceiling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Loose Lips Sink... The Constitution
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 27, 2008 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read somewhere else that Thomas is probably so silent because he does not want to reveal how ignorant he is about the cases before him.
Hey, this guy actually believes that there is NO separation of Church and State when it comes to the states. (In other words, if your governor wanted to make sure everyone in your state worshiped as he, then Thomas would actually back this move.) Good thing he keeps silent.
Loose lips sink the Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HE MAY BE QUIET
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Feb 27, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But he does vote! He has nothing to say because he has no idea what the rest of them are talking about. He had NO constitutional law experience when he was appointed. Once he got the job, why bother cracking the books. Another Bush hoax, using Anita Hill as a distraction. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Appoint me to the SCOTUS!
Posted by: PrezKennedy on Feb 27, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll at least ask questions. I have little to no clue about law, but at least it would look like I was doing my job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MY ONLY FEELING ABOUT CLARENCE THOMAS IS:.........
Posted by: yogendra2 on Feb 27, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"wE BELIEVE YOU, ANITA."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps he's quiet because...
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 27, 2008 6:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there's no need to ask questions when he already knows the outcome! Why expend the energy?

Maybe he thinks speaking out would be redundant... kinda like "gilding the lily."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why are we all italicized???
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 27, 2008 6:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
n/c

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

At least they could have us leaning to the left!
Posted by: Quannah on Feb 27, 2008 7:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
n/c

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» pfft! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: pfft! Posted by: Quannah