Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Google Censors a Site That Exposes United Nations Corruption

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 3:08 PM on February 20, 2008.


After more than two years, Inner City Press disappears from Google News.
unlogo

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

Anyone on the U.N. corruption beat in the past couple years has likely come across Inner City Press, a no-frills United Nations-focused news site that happens to be "the most effective and important media organization for U.N. whistleblowers," according to Bea Edwards of the Government Accountability Project (GAP). Since December 2005, Inner City Press has run stories spotlighting wrongdoing and malfeasance within the United Nations Development Program, from Turkey to West Africa to North Korea.

Inner City Press has filled an important niche: "Current whistleblower protections at the U.N. are grossly inadequate," according to GAP. With would-be whistleblowers vulnerable to retaliation, the news site has "reported the arcane tactics of silencing the free speech of employees of conscience in the U.N. system."

Now, it looks like Inner City Press itself is the subject of retaliation -- and not, at first glance, by the U.N. Instead, the site has been buried by the very search engine that has driven traffic to it for more than two years: Google News.

Earlier this month, editor-in-chief Matthew Lee received an ominous message on behalf of Google:

"We periodically review news sources, particularly following user complaints, to ensure Google News offers a high quality experience for our users … When we reviewed your site we've found that we can no longer include it in Google News."

Are "user complaints" coming from the U.N.?

Surprise: FOX News is on the trail:

In November 2007, during a press conference in which Google announced its partnership with the UNDP to achieve anti-poverty goals, Lee earned a less-than-friendly response when he asked why the Internet company hadn't signed a global human-rights and anti-censorship compact -- elements in the U.N.'s Millennium Development Goals…

It was this incident, Lee said, that put him in the crosshairs. Lee said he felt certain that the Internet company and the international agency had now joined forces to make his work less accessible to the public.

"I've been covering … U.N. stories, three to four a day, for two years, and for the last two years there's been no problem at all," Lee said. "Then that Friday, I received the e-mail. There's something a little skeezy here. I think that Google got involved with the U.N. on these Millennium goals and thought, this is the United Nations, if they tell you some small Web site is a thorn in their side and there's a credible reason you could remove them from your news service, you do it."

Sound conspiratorial? A bit. And yet …

"Google's reference to 'user complaints' is disturbing," says Bea Edwards. "We can't help wondering who is complaining about Inner City Press. Considering their continuing coverage of U.N. whistleblower issues, it's not too difficult to venture a guess."

Read the GAP press release here.

Digg!

Tagged as: whistleblower, inner city press, google, united nations

Liliana Segura is an AlterNet staff writer and editor of the Rights & Liberties section.


FEC Decides that the First Amendment Actually Applies to Bloggers
You are now free to blog about your country ...
Post by Steven Reynolds. August 20, 2008.
DOJ Preparing to Charge Six Blackwater Guards in Nisour Square Massacre
Indictments for the killing of 17 Iraqis would likely be sought under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, which would be unprecedented.
Post by Nick Fiske. August 19, 2008.
Act Now: Tell Texas Not to Execute an Innocent Man
The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles will make a decision tomorrow in the case of Jeff Wood, who faces execution for killing no one.
Post by Liliana Segura. August 18, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Could this work to our advantage?
Posted by: jpopphan@charter.net on Feb 20, 2008 12:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wonder if enough of us complained to Google about Faux News, would they drop them from their newsfeeds?

hee hee

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Consider yourselves lucky...
Posted by: Blue Heron on Feb 20, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that you have some distance from the Google brats. I have to commute to Mountain View, CA every day and look at their smug little mugs. This story is surprising to you? And what, you thought their motto "Don't be Evil" was some kind of genuine attempt to magically turn corporate America into an ethical enterprise? No one should be surprised, least of all when we're talking about a company run by yuppies and smug little white frat boys. Tech companies are not much better than other businesses in this sense, and the 'cool' factor does not elevate them to angelic status.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Related: Whistle-Blower Site Wikileaks Shut Down
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 20, 2008 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This reminds me of the recent story of how a US judge has ordered the whistle-blower site Wikileaks to be shut down completely. (Well, the US version of the site has been shut down anyway.)

It is hard to be a whistle-blower in America, especially these days when not even those who pretend to support you will allow you to be heard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A bit out of date.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Feb 20, 2008 10:26 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Inner City Press News Release:

"UNITED NATIONS, February 19 -- One week after excluding Inner City Press from its Google News service, and after protests and media coverage, Google quietly resumed including the publication's articles in the database, without apology or explanation. The company's responses to journalists' inquiries, that the removal was based on receipt of a single complaint, from a complainant Google would not identify, raise more questions than they answer."

Thus, the news source is back on Google News.

Google News is an excellent service (too bad Lexis-Nexis isn't publicly available) but they don't make their complete list of news sources available, or the criteria for selection as a "Google News Source."

There is the Google News Report, which tracks headlines on the Google News page.

It would be very disturbing if Google were to start censoring their general search engine, so that sites could be made invisible to Google searches. This seems unlikely (though that was the implication of the article).

The Chinese regime uses something similar to block foreign "subversive" web sites (including Google) as does Burma - and plenty of U.S. government officials and corporate executives would like to be able to block some web sites as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A bit out of date. Posted by: prayerworks
Not Just Google
Posted by: johnjmccarthy on Feb 21, 2008 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Twice in the last year while accessing pages on my site http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com
I was surprised to find a warning message covering the page which stated that continuing to view this site "might cause mechanical failure" to your computer. Additionally, this source claimed that "numerous complaints" had prompted this warning.

I contacted the "private" company who has taken on the mantel of "Independent Internet Security" and demanded to be informed of at least one computer failure attributed to viewing my site. If they would provide that information and I could verify it I promised to take down my site poste haste. Two days later the warning message was removed. My stat counter showed a distinct drop in site visitors for those two days. What had numbered an average of 450 had dropped to 35 and less.

Cui Bono?

Ah, yes, Internet 'censorship' is alive and well. It's ALIVE!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Google is becoming the big brother!
Posted by: farhada on Feb 21, 2008 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have seen this before. A few weeks aog, a friend of mine sent me a message and a link to a site that was saying:

Google removed Abu Trika’s “Sympathize with Gaza” images from the internet

So I put the text on my blog and did a search for images abdolian.com, and the results you can find here:

Google Image Result of the search

All images on my blog are there except the following:

- War made Easy by Norman Solomon with links to the site that sells it
- Image of my wife's book : "No Questions Asked - News Coverage Since 9/11"

And of course:

The image of Abu Tarika's celebration after hi scored a goal to show his solidarity with people of Gaza!

This is becoming a sad trend, specially since Google is the most dominant search engine on the planet, they black listing can cause extreme damage to the traffic to a site (all my sites receive 40-80% traffic from Google).

The question is what can we do to stop this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And Yahoo Could Soon Become Even Worse Than Google
Posted by: QQOblivion on Feb 21, 2008 7:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another Issue: Maybe you want to use Yahoo instead of Google if you want to try doing a search that might get different hits than a Google search gets.
But Yahoo is looking to possibly (possibly, now) be bought out by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp! If that happens, then Yahoo too, if not to even much more of an extent than Google does, will likely censor searches.
(Another possible likely buyer: Microsoft. But, hey, I have no confidence in Microsoft's good will and fair practices either. Nor should you.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Google - an arm of the state: "Good Germans" Heil Bush!
Posted by: AlwaysAskWhy on Feb 21, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google is now officially an arm of the state... a company of "Good Germans."

Google and AT&T, just like Blackwater, should be issuing their employees official company/state uniforms: BLACK SHIRTS and arm bands ... maybe even weapons, huh?

GOODBYE TRUTH. GOODBYE DEMOCRACY. GOODBYE FREEDOM.

HEIL BUSH!

Project for the Old American Century -
14 Points of Fascism
http://www.oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm

6.) Controlled Mass Media: Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

This is an important site. It includes explanations, references and links that explain how the U.S. has been stealthily converted from a democratic experiment to a FASCIST STATE.

“The liberty of democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic STATE itself. That, in its essence, is FASCISM – ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power.” -- President Franklin D. Roosevelt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What I don't get...
Posted by: mobius1ski on Feb 21, 2008 6:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is how Google was so quick to delist this site, yet despite repeated complaints, various anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim sites continue to show up as credible news sources in Google News searches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]