Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

For Women Behind Bars Conditions Couldn't Be Worse

Posted by Bean , Lawyers, Guns and Money at 3:03 PM on January 17, 2008.


While women are being incarcerated in record numbers, the abuse they face in jail remains invisible.
39281761priz203

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

This shouldn't come as a surprise: prison is not a fun place to be for anyone, but especially not for women. Why is it so bad for women, you ask?

Well, for one thing, because of drug war policies that have a disproportionate impact on women, more women than ever are ending up in America's prisons and jails.

And once they're there, the conditions are even worse than the horrid conditions in men's prisons. In some states, there is so little room available in women's prisons, that women are being randomly assigned to men's prisons, where they are segregated, their freedom of movement is even more limited, and they face other discrimination with regard to the availability of education, job training, etc.

But wait! There's more!

Around the country, incarcerated women face being raped and sexually abused by the men "guarding" them. As detailed in a recent RH Reality Check column (reposted on AlterNet), guard-on-prisoner sexual assault occurs frequently. Sometimes, the guards do not even seek consent. Other times, the guards bribe women for sex, allowing them to have cigarettes, books, and other privileges. In those situations, though there may be "consent," there is no real consent because the women have no real option other than to say yes. "No" could mean retaliation including (but not limited to) loss of privileges and embarrassing searches. And should a woman report that she has been assaulted, she is often placed in solitary confinement "for her own protection."

To make matters worse, birth control and emergency contraception are rarely available to incarcerated women, abortion can be difficult (to impossible) to obtain (barring a lawsuit), and children are - almost without exception- removed from their incarcerated mothers immediately after birth (which, itself, often happens in shackles).

All of which is to say this: as long as we're incarcerating women in such great numbers (which I obviously think we shouldn't be, but that's for another post), we have got to be more attentive to treating them better. Just because they're hidden away behind barbed wire and guard towers doesn't mean they don't exist.

Digg!

Tagged as: prison, gender, reproductive justice

Bean is a third-year law student in New York City. Her blogging focuses on the intersections of criminal justice, reproductive rights, gender equality, and drug policy.


Race-Baiting Former Senator Jesse Helms Has Died
Conservative Republican railed against "Negro hoodlums", opposed the Voting Rights Act, backed terrorists, and died an unrepentant segregationist.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 4, 2008.
House Judiciary Committee: Rove Must Testify
Former Bush adviser must tell Congress what he knows about U.S. Attorney purge, Don Siegelman prosecution.
Post by Amanda Terkel. July 3, 2008.
Is the Department of Justice Tracking Your Mobile Phone Without a Warrant?
The ACLU sues the DOJ to learn more about warrantless triangulation.
Post by Lindsay Beyerstein. July 3, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why the difference?
Posted by: Knowmad on Jan 17, 2008 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...because of drug war policies that have a disproportionate impact on women, more women than ever are ending up in America's prisons and jails.

I haven't heard this. Could you please tell us why the drug policies cause this disproportionate impact on women? Thanks (Mr?) Bean

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why the difference? Posted by: abirdandabottle
» RE: Why the difference? Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Why the difference? Posted by: blitzmesser
It COULD be worse.
Posted by: magus65 on Jan 17, 2008 3:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After all they might have to share a cell with a guy like Ann Coulter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DOSTOYEVSKY SAID THAT YOU COULD JUDGE THE STATE OF
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jan 19, 2008 1:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a culture by the state of its prisons. Ne Kulturney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Human Rights
Posted by: Dianka on Jan 20, 2008 8:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
US prisons have grown increasingly barbaric, and the treatment of women is especially inhumane.
This is one of several areas where the US is now regarded world-wide as a violator of international human rights standards. It's amazing what can happen when people of conscience remain silent.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Human Rights Posted by: blitzmesser