Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Feinstein Buckles to Grassroots Pressure, FISA Bill Passes Without Telecom Immunity

Posted by Howie Klein, Down With Tyranny! at 5:15 AM on November 16, 2007.


Howie Klein: Bush's main Democratic ally on the Senate Judiciary Committee, grudgingly voted for a bill that doesn't allow for retroactive immunity.

This post, written by Howie Klein, originally appeared on Down With Tyranny!

Earlier this evening the House passed by a vote of 227-189 a bill that would strengthen court oversight of government surveillanceand refused the Bush Regime's and their Republican rubber stamp allies' demands that law breakers inside the big telecom corporations be granted retroactive immunity for criminal behavior. Bush, of course, has vowed to veto the bill. He may not have to.

Obstructionists in the Senate are determined to kill the bill in the Senate. Today they suffered a mini-setback when Dianne Feinstein, Bush's main Democratic ally on the Senate Judiciary Committee, grudgingly voted for a bill that doesn't allow for retroactive immunity. Corporate hacks like Mitch McConnell (R-KY) went bonkers and are promising to filibuster it. Just so you don't get the idea that Feinstein has seen the light, just before she voted to allow the bill without the retroactive immunity go to the ful Senate, she had voted against Russ Feingold's amendment to specifically kill retroactive immunity.

Just minutes before the vote, the committee had voted 11-to-8 in favor of immunity for the phone companies.

Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Cal., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., voted with the nine Republicans on the panel in favor of preserving the immunity clause.

But in a strange twist that left many wondering what had happened, just minutes after this vote, Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, called for a separate vote to approve the bill without the section of the legislation with the immunity provisions.

The committee approved Leahy's call 10-9, along party lines.

So pressure on Feinstein needs to be maintained and increased. Today MoveOn joined the Courage Campaign to do this. And the Courage Campaign is not backing down and not taking any sops from Feinstein or her insider allies.

Speaker Pelosi's blog has all the details of what the House did pass and why it is important.

Digg!

Tagged as: telecom immunity, bush, pelosi, fisa, warrantless wiretapping, feinstein

Howie Klein is the creator of the blog Down With Tyranny!


MoveOn.org, ColorOfChange.org and NAS to Protest FOX's Racism in NYC
ColorOfChange.org and MoveOn.org Members To Deliver More Than 600,000 petition signatures to FOX headquarters in Manhattan.
Post by AlterNet Staff. July 22, 2008.
Dead Black Man Was Tasered Nine Times by White Cop
Who happens to like using his Taser quite a bit.
Post by Steven D.. July 22, 2008.
Conservatives Want Bush to Issue "Pre-Emptive Pardons" to Officials Involved in Illegal Programs
These are lawyers with little respect for the rule of law.
Post by Ben. July 22, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Good For The Goose
Posted by: QQOblivion on Nov 16, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me get this straight. When Democrats threaten to block some piece of fascist legislation that would allow unfettered spying on Americans, then they are labeled as "siding with the terrorists" or are "America-haters" or whatever Bush, the Republicans, and other Right-Wing jackasses try to call them.
But when REPUBLICANS don't get their way completely on a spying bill that would supposedly keep America safe (I have my doubts about that one), then they stomp their feet, cry, and threaten filibusters or vetoes.
Sounds about right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You are absolutely right Posted by: QQOblivion
Now, if only the grassroots would jam the phones over impeachment
Posted by: Rune on Nov 16, 2007 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Come on, people. Look what happened when a few of us (yes, I was one) called the top Democrat in the Senate to protest the series of sell-outs by a senior senator that probably won't ever face another election. What could happen if about ten times as many people applied that kind of pressure to Conyers and Pelosi, who are bottling up the Cheney impeachment measure Kucinich has introduced and the Republicans have gone on record against tabling?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not buckling
Posted by: sliver on Nov 16, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not buckling if she's on your team. The headline should read Feinstein "listens" to grassroots pressure.

Senators are like children. You sometimes need to be strict, but when they listen to you, you should reward them and they will be more likely to listen in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's not buckling Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
Dianne is a follower
Posted by: janelynne on Nov 16, 2007 2:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Had Dianne had someone to cook a side deal with, she would have executed the play. But alone, Feinstein is a defacto conservative paper tiger. This woman has to be removed from the judiciary committee. She does not represent the Democratic party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Romelee
Posted by: kbrightwelll@earthlink.net on Nov 17, 2007 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep after them to do what is right we need afew more Fiengolds and Dodds to get the white house back.They don`t stick together enough it seems to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Di-Fi can be moved under pressure
Posted by: chabuka on Nov 17, 2007 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what the hell is wrong with Pelosi..I know she is under just as much public pressure to impeach....what is she (and Reid, Hoyer) hiding?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: If Di-Fi can be moved under pressure Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN