Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

'Out of Control' Cop Allegedly Brutalizes Guests at Dem Fundraiser

Posted by Staff, AlterNet at 8:00 AM on June 30, 2009.


“I have never personally witnessed law enforcement officers behave this brutally and incompetently ...”

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

San Diego Union Tribune:

The sheriff's deputy who broke up a fund-raiser for Francine Busby looked “out of control” as he doused guests with pepper spray, pulled out a stun gun, and dropped a 60-year-old woman to the floor, witnesses said.

The San Diego County Sheriff's Department has launched an internal investigation into the incident Friday night at the home on Rubenstein Avenue in the Cardiff community of Encinitas.

Authorities were called to the home of Shari Barman and Jane Stratton after a neighbor complained about noise, and Barman was arrested in the ensuing altercation with Deputy Marshall Abbott.

“He had a raged look in his eyes and his head was bobbing from side to side,” said Kimberley Beatty, who attended the event. She said she called 911 to report that the officer “appeared to be out of control.”

Beatty spoke Monday afternoon at a news conference along with two other guests at the fund-raiser, Christine Nava and Julie Chippendale.

Chippendale also said that Abbott “looked like he was feeling out of control.”

“His eyes were darting around the room as if we may have guns,” she said. “Guests were yelling, 'What are you doing? Let her go!' ”

Busby, 58, is a Democrat seeking the 50th Congressional District seat in 2010. She said about 30 of her supporters gathered at the home to raise campaign money for next year's race against Congressman Brian Bilbray.

She said she used an amplified microphone from about 8 to 8:30 p.m. to address what she described as 30 or fewer guests; witnesses said an unidentified neighbor interrupted the speech by heckling Busby, calling her a “loser” and obscenities.

Read the rest here ...

Read Shari Barman's statement here.

Digg!

Tagged as: police burtality, busby


Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison?
The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers.
Post by Liliana Segura. November 9, 2009.
Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA
It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake.
Post by Ari Berman. November 9, 2009.
The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Police brutality?
Posted by: folkie on Jun 30, 2009 8:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In a police state?

Ah, but this time it was against whites.

It is high time that people began to understand the fascist system they're supporting.

Police brutality happens hundreds of times every day to people of color in poor neighborhoods. Until and unless it begins to happen as frequently to middle and upper class whites, it will continue to go unremarked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Police brutality? Posted by: rinthy
» Cali cops used to bust up Okies, too Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: Pigs are just PIGS! Posted by: sasquuatch55
» RE: Police brutality? Posted by: Romantic Violence
» Cops, Marriage and a rant Posted by: jennymac
» RE: Cops, Marriage and a rant Posted by: Romantic Violence
Steroids for Cop-boys...
Posted by: Razional Thinker on Jun 30, 2009 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
anyone? Me thinks that "look of rage in his eye" was a sign of a very big problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Steroids for Cop-boys... Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson
Typical behavior of
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Jun 30, 2009 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
pigs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

another savage weiner fan, no doubt
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jun 30, 2009 9:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just watch.

#@!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nutcase
Posted by: frank69 on Jun 30, 2009 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Crazy nutcase cop. What's new?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nutcase Posted by: Dak
Brutallity. Inhumane?
Posted by: Hoot42 on Jun 30, 2009 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Status Quo. Get over it or change it for everybody!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brutallity. Inhumane? Posted by: rinthy
» RE: anyone I've forgotten... Posted by: Sister_Lauren
I cannot understand
Posted by: bettyn on Jun 30, 2009 3:06 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHY we can't have law enforcement officers who act like decent human beings? Why do they have to be so NASTY all the time? I can understand all this "show of force" when dealing with out of control criminals, but in dealing with most citizens and an incident such as this one, there is no excuse for this kind of behavior. The sad thing is that this clown will probably get away with his actions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I can understand Posted by: johnbradleycopeland
» RE: I can understand Posted by: Sister_Lauren
Police Brutality
Posted by: Atheistno1 on Jun 30, 2009 3:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Welcome to the world of hate & spite. Where the human right is a thing of the past & Catholic women are calling for the use of torture. The police are given bigger policing powers & the local community organisations have special powers to contribute to those police powers, even to investigate their own criminal conduct. Police are even more corrupt now that the Mafia has been drawn to a controllable level & here in Australia, it's the Bikie gangs that are being held accountable for the Police Mafia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Be Glad You're Not Gay!
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on Jun 30, 2009 3:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the Anniversary of the Stonewall Riots the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission and the Fort Worth Police raided a local gay establishment called the "Rainbow Lounge" under the guise of looking for "public intoxication" where they went on to arrest several citizen's in the bar who were not intoxicated and beat one patron to the point of hospitilization for brain injuries! Just "good old boys" doing thier constitutional duty! If you live in Fort Worth (sic) please contact Mr. Jose Cuevas, Jr., Presiding Officer of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission and make a formal complaint as I did. Mr. Cuevas owns and operates JumBurrito restaurants in Fort Worth, Texas. A boycott may be necessary to show how displeased the public is. The United States of America is becoming a police state!!!!! Wake up and take action before you are next in your own home town!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Police State mentality
Posted by: Mrs. Jefferson on Jun 30, 2009 10:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No politician today can stand on the shoulders of past patriots and our founders claiming they represent a democracy. We look like a Police State and Empire Builder.

"America has one political party with two right-wings." - Gore Vidal

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE RIGHT ENCOURAGES THIS KIND OF POLICING IN ORDER TO BEAT US INTO SUBMISSION.
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jun 30, 2009 10:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Realize that as centrist seeming as some of them are they openly state that they do not believe in democracy. They say that this is a republic and not a democracy. They want, and usually have, a representative republic where they own and buy all of the representatives. Bush said that it was an ownership society.

Today's policemen don't know any real people. They only associate with other policemen. After work they associate with other policemen and their wives. There is sort of a mental social inbreeding that goes on. Everybody on earth is their enemy except another policeman. They have all watched "Dirty Harry" 14 times and believe that every word of it is true.

Interestingly many people in the immigrant communities are smarter about police than our natives. Our natives were brought up on an intellectual pablum that the police were your friends. Immigrants saw police that were the servants of the wealthy.

Our police are the servants of the wealthy. Our wealthy want us repressed. They are afraid of us. They are afraid of democracy. They put up their money to suppress democracy, to reduce our freedoms, and to increase theirs.

The primary function of a policeman is to function as a mobile tax collector. What is the one thing that can get a policman fired? You got it. Simply don't write enough tickets.

Ask any police supervisor if they have a quota? The answer is an unequivocal no. Then you ask how the officers are evaluated and you are told that they have an activity sheet. What does that mean? They must keep a log of their activities. And if there is not enough activity do they get fired? Well yes eventually. And what is it on the activity sheets that is so important? It is the number of tickets that they wrote. We have made full circle.

Why is this form of tax collection so desirable? It is regressive. It is a relatively small tax on a lot of plain folks. It is not a large tax on rich people.

Besides the rich peole have their "driver" take them to the airport where their private jet moves them about effortlessly. While we get ticketed for going 10 over the speed limit and they go 600 miles per hour perfectly legally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

COPS GONE WILD
Posted by: electriclady281 on Jul 1, 2009 12:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The same happened to me at the Mt. Vernon Assisted-Care Facility in Mt. Vernon, MO, a year and a half ago when I went to see my dying mother. Because my usual ride did not show up and I was in a strange town with no taxi and snow falling I was unable to leave the premises by the end of visiting hours. Within minutes a huge copy showed up and before long had tried to throw me down, but found me unexpectedly difficult to down and so threw himself on top of me, breaking my wrist in the process. It is still not completely healed and hurts. All this was within earshot and sight of my mother. That was the last time I saw her.

It much later developed that this brute was offended because I laughed when he arrived (which had nothing to do with his appearance) and because my mother and I spoke in a language he did not understand.

Cops all over this country have gone wild. I have not the funds to stand up to City Hall in that incestuous small town. I should add that I am 66 years old; then 65...and I am white.

That cop is a danger to anyone he comes into contact with and should be taken off the street.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cop profile-demographic taxpayers
Posted by: socrates2 on Jul 1, 2009 10:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Raymondemerson has the cops' number. If you are a minority, young and/or poor, you fall in the demographic cops' "profile."
The folks who "fall" in these categories pay the "cop-demographic tax."
You will be stopped, searched, and a reason to charge, ticket, and arrest you will be found_. If your car is towed as an "incident to your arrest," recovering your car will entail a towing and storage fee running in the hundreds of dollars. And don't tell me cops don't get a kickback for selecting the towing company and their storage yard. I was born at night, just not _last_ night...
The middle-class is finding out what minorities and the young have known for ages: cops are arbitrary as hell, lie like 3rd graders, and judges take their word over your's every day. Hell, otherwise how could the judges collect revenue for the state and justify their costly salaries?
By the way, these are _San Diego_ cops, as in "shoot/taze now, ask questions later." As a Californian, need I say more?
Cops should be drafted, serve three years, and move one, much like the military service used to be. Professional cops are much like professional soldiers, they become _committed_ to a corrupting "victory at all costs" at a huge price to our republic and our civil liberties. Needless to say, their professional in-breeding tends to isolate them from the civilians they're supposed to "protect and serve." I have seen these "professionals" become antisocial, pathological liars, sociopaths, perjurers, wife-beaters and alcoholics. If not worse...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Document! Document!!
Posted by: Scarabus on Jul 2, 2009 4:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all worry (with obvious justification) about surveillance. But surveillance is a two-edged sword. It cuts to promote social justice equally as effectively as it cuts to enforce repression.

Remember the RNC Convention in NYC? Videotaping of unjustified, inhumane, illegal police brutality against protesters won hundreds of legal cases for persons either protesting arrest or actually bringing suit against the city. Remember St. Paul? The police (directed and instructed by federal officials) both preemptively and brutally tried to quash any video evidence of their behavior.

Exposure to sunlight promotes restraint and restricts the growth of dangerous infection. Tyrants hate the sunlight. Uh, China? Iran?

Which means? Document everything! The internet can be like a magnifying glass, intensifying the effect of healing sunlight.

[Over the top rhetorically, but I really believe what I'm saying.]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad cops, good cops
Posted by: janten on Jul 2, 2009 6:38 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that it sounds like the reported actions of the police officer, as well as the state he apparently was in were inappropriate for the situation. I also agree that there are many police officers who are probably not mentally and/or emotionally fit to serve in a role as peace keepers. It also seems to me that the police in large cities are probably more likely to behave inappropriately than police in small towns.

On the other hand, I know that a lot of police officers are very good at doing their jobs under the demands and duress and within the constraints that they have to deal with on a daily basis. It is totally unfair as well as unnecessary and unhelpful to demonize all law enforcement people because of the inappropriate behaviors of those who fall short of how they should behave.

Furthermore, those of you who are YELLING IN ALL COPS about ALL COPS or even MOST COPS behaving inappropriately are behaving just as poorly as the cops you are YELLING about.

Every single one of you sitting comfortably at your computers will undoubtedly try to defend your right, perhaps even your obligation as 'good' citizens, to behave as you are -- exactly as every cop you are complaining about would like to defend his or her right to take 'strong action' in the heat of the moment. If you can't control yourself in carrying on a simple discussion about law enforcement while tapping on your keyboard, what right do you have to demonize and complain about a cop who does not control him/herself while dealing with yet another situation in a whole string of situations, some of which can be very dangerous?

I'm sorry, but your really don't have any right to demand better behavior from our law enforcement officers if you can't behave well yourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressives: stop avoiding juror duty!
Posted by: red godowar on Jul 3, 2009 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first point I want to make is this. There is nothing more important in our democracy than juror service.

Society has been led to believe (by the government, by corporations, by the elites, by the media/Hollywood; it does not matter who has caused it) that you are a "fool" if you can't get out of jury duty. Common refrain: "Aw, bummer, I've been summoned for jury duty."

Important second point: when you serve on a jury, there is NOBODY in the country with more power than you at that time. Nobody in the government, no corporation, no elite has more power than you when you are a juror.

From the above story, I can almost promise you that by the time this cop hits a witness stand, he will have "lost" that out of control demeanor, and wild darting of his eyes. He will come into the courtroom in his full, regular uniform, which most people automatically will give him more credibility simply for wearing a uniform, and he will act professionally as he has had at least a week of training on how to testify (or, as we call it: "Testi-Lie").

Most conservatives on juries will NOT call him out on his behavior at the scene. SOME progressives will.

Instead of just griping on here, you must readily, willingly, and NOBLY serve on juries if you truly seek justice!

One other thing that I want to bring to everyone's attention. I cannot tell if the phenomenon right now is one of two things, or maybe something else. First, it would seem that we overwhelmingly see vast majorities of conservatives/pro-authority-types appearing for jury service. Is this because progressives are evading jury service, or is something more corrupt and sinister going on?

Is the system itself rigging the juror pool whereby only pro-cops show up for jury duty in criminal cases?

Don't forget that extensive background information about jurors is gathered before ever stepping into a courtroom. In my last jury trial, I witnessed this (and it's odds in reality are astronomical). When asked these following, two questions, not a single potential juror raised a hand. "Have any of you had a bad experience with a cop?" "Do you know of anybody who has had a bad experience with a cop?"

Something really wrong is going on, and I don't know how to get to the bottom of it. If anybody else has any more insight into this, for the sake of us all, do tell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not an anomaly?
Posted by: Jill 2 on Jul 3, 2009 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like the Bernard Madoff situation, where had he not ripped off rich people– no one would have cared one bit. Had these good Democrat Progressives who suffered these fascist depredations had been poor Mexicans or Blacks, this would not be seen as newsworthy; things like this happen all the time to them. But what is clearly of importance here is to see this as a new escalation in political repression in its choice of a more politically 'upscale' target. It is comforting to see this as an 'individual,' one of a kind incident of a deranged red-neck cop. But how to you explain the quasi military style operation with the chopper and a whole squadron of 'troops.' Sounds vaguely familiar to Iraq.

Instances like this, in the future, will become much more common. As such, they are simply precursors or premonitions of what soon will be commonplace, as Americans become inured to an impending fascist state. Concepts like 'torture,' which were once deemed beyond the pale, have now attained a disgusting mantle of intellectual and even 'moral' legitimacy; soon proto- military home invasions will be the order of the day, and be seen as quite acceptable. The same will be the case with extra legal police actions on private domestic citizenry, even on benign groupings of near elderly white women.

It is easy enough to say that the San Diego community has a virulent right wing Republican demographic, with an institutional antipathy toward civil rights. But is this really some aberrant anomaly.?That would be missing the larger picture, which is the unprecedented and wide spread assault on Civil liberties by the Bush Administration, by an outright neo fascist Supreme Court, and now by the continued promulgation of the very same agenda by the putatively 'liberal' Obama administration.The pattern of creeping fascist incrementalism proceeds seamlessly, worming its way into the brocade of American consciousness.

The techniques once reserved exclusively for darker skinned folks overseas by C.I.A. and American military terror, now find space on the domestic front. Francine Busby, and her peaceful coterie, are lucky enough they didn't get hit by a Predator drone as all those wedding and funeral gatherings did in Afghanistan or Pakistan. For the truth be told, there are many who would hardly bat an eye, and their are plenty of John Woo's around to explain it all to a debased American public. One can safely look no further than the Obama Justice Department for the most recent ravages against American civil liberties. Predator drone military technology will be coming soon enough to an American suburb near you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

get this police officer off the streets...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jul 3, 2009 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...fire him or at least demote him to a desk job where he won't accidentally use his gun on anyone...

to serve and protect?

jitterbug cops... wtf is happening...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you distrust your local cops' ability for decision-making & citizen respect
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 4, 2009 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THEN GO PROTEST AT THE LOCAL MUNICIPAL & REGIONAL GOVERNMENT OFFICES

if you don't somebody is gonna end up dead, maimed or 'broom-handled'


EITHER we start DEMANDING COPS IMPROVE & THAT WE GIVE COPS MORE NON-VIOLENCE & non-CONFRONTATIONAL training...

or they're gonna get weirder & weirder AS THEY HIRE MORE VETERANS & GET BIGGER BUDGETS FOR 'COMPLIANCE TOYS'

count on it.

EITHER GET ACTIVE LOCALLY, or START VOLUNTEERING FOR THE CASKET BEARING.

when times get tough, the MONEY & POWER start telling the cops to "KEEP THOSE PROTESTERS DOWN, NOW!"

your choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sex
Posted by: sex on Jul 6, 2009 2:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]