Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Karl Rove Launches Gender-Loaded 'Emotion' Attack on Sotomayor

Posted by Matt Corley, Think Progress at 9:35 AM on May 28, 2009.


Karl Rove implies that Sotomayor's judicial decisions are led by "emotion."

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

Even before President Obama announced Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his nominee to replace Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, former Bush adviser Karl Rove began attacking her credentials. Since then, Rove has claimed that she’s “not necessarily” smart and has acted “like sort of a schoolmarm” on the 2nd court of appeals. Today, in his Wall Street Journal column, he implies that her judicial decisions are led by “emotion“:

“Empathy” is the latest code word for liberal activism, for treating the Constitution as malleable clay to be kneaded and molded in whatever form justices want. It represents an expansive view of the judiciary in which courts create policy that couldn’t pass the legislative branch or, if it did, would generate voter backlash.

There is a certain irony in a president who routinely praises America’s commitment to “the rule of law” but who picks Supreme Court nominees for their readiness to discard the rule of law whenever emotion moves them.

Rove isn’t the first conservative to use the gender-loaded “emotion” attack against Sotomayor. In a blog post for the American Enterprise Institute, torture advocate John Yoo wrote that Republicans needed “to make sure that she will not be a results-oriented voter, voting her emotions and politics rather than the law.”

Digg!

Tagged as: supreme court, karl rove, wall street journal, sotomayor


Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison?
The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers.
Post by Liliana Segura. November 9, 2009.
Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA
It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake.
Post by Ari Berman. November 9, 2009.
The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Karl, You Piss Me Off
Posted by: ranchero42 on May 28, 2009 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But what else is new? Would you like to guess what else is getting old? Attacks from right wingers who give no evidence, are clearly unable to cite any proof to concerns they claim to have. This is the law, remember? People take notes; there is documentation that will either prove or disprove ad hominem statements. Bush's brain was a good match for Dubya. Both are way too lazy to bother doing homework. Up to now we have been led to believe one of them is smart enough to get away with it. When the "mighty" never attempted the climb, they will never have to worry about the fall.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"NOT Necessarily Smart" "Schoolmarm" and "emotional"?
Posted by: Razional Thinker on May 28, 2009 1:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Karl, when you stop your verbal bullying, maybe even school children will. Sick of your
a$$ and so done with your comments, I am.

Only on Fox.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Or.....
Posted by: mikeblack on May 28, 2009 1:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't doubt that the emotionally stunted Karl Rove is still stuck in a "girls have cooties!" mindset (I'd be amazed if he has ever had sex with a woman without paying for it, actually) but I don't know. Since conservatives loved Sandra Day O'Connor, I have to wonder if this isn't a reference to women being emotional, but playing up the "fiery Latino" stereotype.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This from a guy who flunked out
Posted by: Freticat on May 29, 2009 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not just once, but several times, never even got a bachelor's degree and only went to college to maintain a draft deferment. He's not a turd blossom, he's just a turd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Alert-Please
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on May 29, 2009 10:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For goodness sake, will you please stop feeding this fat doughboy's ego, why do you insist on covering him, he is a sexist, a racist and a liar!!!!!!! Just like Bush and Cheney, we don't need to be reminded in print or on the air, so how about focusing on something that is worth while, like a Single Payer Health Care System.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carl - WTF - NOBODY care what you think!
Posted by: johnbradleycopeland on May 29, 2009 11:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carl why you aren't in prison yet is what I'd like to know?! You, Carl, are TRASH and so is Fox Network for giving you a job!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Herr Karl
Posted by: Natasha_W on May 29, 2009 1:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rove has claimed that she’s “not necessarily” smart and has acted “like sort of a schoolmarm” on the 2nd court of appeals. Today, in his Wall Street Journal column, he implies that her judicial decisions are led by “emotion“

Karl has no room to talk...his education history is some what sketchy.

In the fall of 1969, Rove entered the University of Utah, on a $1,000 scholarship,as a political science major and joined the Pi Kappa Alpha fraternity.

In December 1969, the Selective Service System held its first lottery drawing. Those born on December 25, like Rove, received number 84. That number placed him in the middle of those who would eventually be drafted. On February 17, 1970, Rove was reclassified as 2-S, a deferment from the draft because of his enrollment at the University of Utah in the fall of 1969. He maintained this deferment until December 14, 1971, despite being only a part-time student in the autumn and spring quarters of 1971 (registered for between six and 12 credit hours) and dropping out of the university in June 1971. Rove was a student at the University of Maryland, College Park in the fall of 1971; as such, he would have been eligible for 2-S status, but registrar's records show that he withdrew from classes during the first half of the semester. In December 1971 he was reclassified as 1-A. On April 27, 1972, he was reclassified as 1-H, or "not currently subject to processing for induction". The draft ended on June 30, 1973.

So much for Rove's intellect!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares!!!!!
Posted by: jaglover on May 29, 2009 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who gives a rats ass what this HAS BEEN has to say about anything. He's the freaking poster boy for what NOT to do so SCREW HIM!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]