Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Rice Channels Nixon: Since the President Authorized Torture, That Makes It Legal
Recently, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke with some students at Stanford University, where she is a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institute. When a student asked whether Rice had authorized torture, she refused to take responsibility, saying only that she "conveyed the authorization of the administration." She added that, "by definition," once the president authorized "enhanced interrogations," they were automatically legal:
Q: Is waterboarding torture?
RICE: The president instructed us that nothing we would do would be outside of our obligations, legal obligations under the Convention Against Torture. So that's -- And by the way, I didn't authorize anything. I conveyed the authorization of the administration to the agency, that they had policy authorization, subject to the Justice Department's clearance. That's what I did.
Q: Okay. Is waterboarding torture in your opinion?
RICE: I just said, the United States was told, we were told, nothing that violates our obligations under the Convention Against Torture. And so by definition, if it was authorized by the president, it did not violate our obligations under the Convention Against Torture.
The Young Turks' Cenk Uygur, who obtained the video, said Rice "
absolutely pulls a Nixon" in her answer.
Rice is attempting to hide her central role in approving torture, as the Senate Armed Services Committee report released last week highlighted. She gave verbal authorization to then-director of the CIA George Tenet to waterboard Abu Zubaydah in July 2002 -- one month before the Office of Legal Counsel gave the legal justification for such torture.
Rice's opinion that a presidential authorization -- "by definition" -- grants something legality is deeply disturbing. In fact, the United States -- and its president -- are bound by U.S. statute and international treaties that ban the use of cruel, humiliating, degrading treatment, the infliction of suffering, and the attempt to extract coerced confessions.
Memo to Rice: Bush may have been "the Decider," but he didn't have the authority to make an illegal act magically legal.
Tagged as: torture, condoleezza rice
Ali Frick is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
| Also in Rights and Liberties | |||
| Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison? The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers. Post by Liliana Segura. November 9, 2009. |
Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake. Post by Ari Berman. November 9, 2009. |
The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings Where's the liberal cover-up? Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009. |
|
EMAIL
PRINT
49 COMMENTS
PERMALINK