Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Gitmo Lawyers Sue Obama Administration, Call for Sanctions Against Defense Secretary Gates

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 9:01 AM on March 24, 2009.


One lawsuit challenges Obama's position on indefinite detention, calling it merely a "partial retreat" from Bush-era policies.
freeuighurs

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

Two weeks after the Obama administration announced that it was no longer labeling terror suspects "enemy combatants" , while still asserting the right to imprison them indefinitely, lawyers representing prisoners at Guantanamo Bay have brought forth multiple lawsuits -- including a motion of contempt against Defense Secretary Robert Gates -- accusing it of violating the Geneva Conventions in its treatment of detainees.
The AFP broke the story on Monday, reporting that it had obtained one court motion, filed Friday on behalf of Huzaifat Parhat, a Chinese Uighur who has been imprisoned at Guantanamo since 2001. Parhat, along with some 17 Uighurs at the prison camp, remains there despite the U.S. government's long acknowledgment that he is not a terrorist and despite a court order last year that they be released -- the first time that a U.S. court has ordered the direct release of a prisoner at Guantánamo.
The story of how the Uighurs came to Guantanamo in the first place is almost incredible; UK-based writer Andy Worthington has covered it extensively. As he recently wrote, "It was clear from the very start of their detention that the Uighurs had nothing to do with either al-Qaeda or the Taliban." Consequently, their plight has attracted international outrage, particularly following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling last winter, which in theory restored the right of habeas corpus to prisoners at Guantanamo, but which did not appear to apply to them. As the New York Times reported at the time (without a hint of irony), the Bush administration said it would not return the Uighur detainees to China "because of concerns about their treatment at the hands of the Chinese government, which views them as terrorists."

"Huzaifa Parhat has now been determined by about as conservative a court as there is not to be an enemy combatant -- this is what we've been saying for years," his lawyer Sabin Willet said last January, "and yet I can't get him out of solitary confinement in the hands of my own government."
That might have been par for the course under Bush. But now the Obama administration is obstructing justice by blocking the release of the Uighurs -- despite the fact that they have never been charged, are not accused of planning terror attacks on the U.S. and that communities within the United States have said they are willing to welcome them.
As members of the group Witness Against Torture, who have launched a campaign to free the Uighur detainees, argue: "There is no need to review whether they should be imprisoned. The Executive Branch, the judiciary, and members of congress all have acknowledged that the Uighurs should be released. The issue for the Obama Administration is not whether the Uighurs should be released, but rather where they should be released."

One of the lawsuits brought last week cites Secretary of Defense Robert Gates's "continued refusal to comply with a final order" by the Washington appeals court ordering Parhat's release. According to the AFP, "the lawyers also demanded that a new court ruling should include 'a threat of sanctions' in order to ensure Gates complies with the order."
Another lawsuit brought on behalf of 15 Gitmo prisoners, "takes issue with new rules laid down by the administration of U.S. President Barack Obama earlier this month justifying the state's right to hold terror suspects." Lawyers called it a "partial retreat" from the Bush administration's position and "lashed out at the government for justifying detaining suspects without charge or trial solely on the basis of a congressional decision authorizing the U.S.-led 'war on terror' after the September 11, 2001 attacks."

The AFP has more.

Digg!

Tagged as: war on terror, robert gates, guantanamo, andy worthington, uighurs, huzaifat parhat

Liliana Segura is a staff writer and editor of AlterNet's Rights and Liberties and War on Iraq Special Coverage.


Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison?
The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers.
Post by Liliana Segura. November 9, 2009.
Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA
It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake.
Post by Ari Berman. November 9, 2009.
The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Uncle Tom Obama
Posted by: QQOblivion on Mar 24, 2009 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brown people, the US is saying by its treatment of detainees (even under the Obama administration), have NO rights to be treated humanely or with any speck of fairness. Just ask President Obama himself (who, by the way, refused to have a US representative go to an anti-racism conference, because of the conference's alleged "anti-Israel bias").

The ONLY reason I will vote for Obama in 2012, and not for a 3rd party candidate, is that it is INEVITABLE that the Republican presidential candidate will be of such PURE EVIL, that even Dick Cheney will look like a progressive hippy humanitarian and virtue-loving SAINT as compared with the Republican candidate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama opened the door for this...
Posted by: Ghoulman on Mar 24, 2009 7:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... so I might suggest. Before, much of the legal stuff has been trapped in the kangaroo court fashioned out of the Pentagons 4th floor. Now lawyers can make a case outside that curtain.

It's greatly significant to drop the 'enemy combatant' crap. Cause it always was crap (I'm looking at you Dick Cheney).

I'm not gonna bash Obama. Considering the giant crimes Washington has committed here, I gotta wonder if this isn't progress. There will be more, much more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]