Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Will Jose Padilla's Lawsuit Against Torture Memo Author John Yoo Move Forward?

Posted by Liliana Segura, AlterNet at 8:32 AM on March 9, 2009.


Obama's DOJ lawyers are trying to get a judge to toss out a lawsuit by the so-called "enemy combatant," who was tortured under Bush.
josepadilla

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

At a hearing in a San Francisco federal court on Friday, lawyers for the Obama administration attempted to squash a lawsuit against former Bush lawyer and "torture memo" author John C. Yoo brought forth by Jose Padilla, the Chicago man famously designated an "illegal enemy combatant" by President Bush in 2002 for allegedly plotting a "dirty bomb" attack on U.S. soil.
Padilla spent three-and-a-half years imprisoned in a black hole at the behest of the Bush administration without being charged or tried. In October of 2006, lawyers for Padilla filed a motion to dismiss his case based on evidence that he had endured multiple forms of torture at the hands of his captors. Glenn Greenwald excerpted portions of their brief at the time, which described in vivid detail the conditions of Padilla's detention, in which included severe isolation, sensory deprivation, and forcible drugging:

For nearly two years -- from June 9, 2002 until March 2, 2004, when the Department of Defense permitted Mr. Padilla to have contact with his lawyers -- Mr. Padilla was in complete isolation. Even after he was permitted contact with counsel, his conditions of confinement remained essentially the same.
He was kept in a unit comprising sixteen individual cells, eight on the upper level and eight on the lower level, where Mr. Padilla's cell was located. No other cells in the unit were occupied. His cell was electronically monitored twenty-four hours a day, eliminating the need for a guard to patrol his unit. His only contact with another person was when a guard would deliver and retrieve trays of food and when the government desired to interrogate him.

In addition to his extreme isolation, Mr. Padilla was also viciously deprived of sleep ... For a substantial period of his captivity, Mr. Padilla's cell contained only a steel bunk with no mattress. ...
... Other times, his captors would bang the walls and cell bars creating loud startling noises. These disruptions would occur throughout the night and cease only in the morning, when Mr. Padilla's interrogations would begin. Efforts to manipulate Mr. Padilla and break his will also took the form of the denial of the few benefits he possessed in his cell. ...
Mr. Padilla's dehumanization at the hands of his captors also took more sinister forms. Mr. Padilla was often put in stress positions for hours at a time. He would be shackled and manacled, with a belly chain, for hours in his cell. Noxious fumes would be introduced to his room causing his eyes and nose to run. The temperature of his cell would be manipulated, making his cell extremely cold for long stretches of time. Mr. Padilla was denied even the smallest, and most personal shreds of human dignity by being deprived of showering for weeks at a time, yet having to endure forced grooming at the whim of his captors.
A substantial quantum of torture endured by Mr. Padilla came at the hands of his interrogators. In an effort to disorient Mr. Padilla, his captors would deceive him about his location and who his interrogators actually were. Mr. Padilla was threatened with being forcibly removed from the United States to another country, including U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where he was threatened his fate would be even worse than in the Naval Brig.
He was threatened with being cut with a knife and having alcohol poured on the wounds. He was also threatened with imminent execution. He was hooded and forced to stand in stress positions for long durations of time. He was forced to endure exceedingly long interrogation sessions, without adequate sleep, wherein he would be confronted with false information, scenarios, and documents to further disorient him. Often he had to endure multiple interrogators who would scream, shake, and otherwise assault Mr. Padilla.
Additionally, Mr. Padilla was given drugs against his will, believed to be some form of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) or phencyclidine (PCP), to act as a sort of truth serum during his interrogations.

Bush officials always denied that Padilla was tortured, arguing in legal documents that he had been treated in a consistently "humane" manner. (After his case was moved to a civilian court -- facing new charges different from the the original "dirty bomb" justification -- Padilla was found guilty of supporting overseas jihad and, last January, sentenced to 17 years in prison at a naval brig in South Carolina.)
Now, Padilla is attempting to sue John C. Yoo, the lawyer whose torture memos helped construct the legal justification for torture for the Bush administration. As Daphne Eviatar points out in the Washington Independent, "interestingly, Padilla is not seeking large monetary damages for his treatment: he's asking for only $1. What he really wants, his lawyers say, is a declaration from the government that his incarceration and harsh treatment were wrong."
Inheriting the case from the Bush DOJ, the Obama administration is now defending Yoo. "We're not saying we condone torture," DOJ attorney Mary Mason said last week, while suggesting (as reported by the New York Times) that Padilla's attorneys were "pursuing a case that was more about politics than law, and were trying to create a new legal theory to tie a lawyer to the results of his memorandums. 'He had no supervisory role over Padilla or his detention,' Ms. Mason said, referring to Mr. Yoo."
Despite the efforts by the Obama administration to throw out the lawsuit, New York Times reporter John Schwartz wrote that "the judge did not seem inclined to dismiss the lawsuit."
"In fact, Judge White, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, even told the government's lawyers that Mr. Yoo's 2001 memorandum stating that the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures can be overridden was "a pretty scary position."

The New York Times and the San Francisco Chronicle have more.

Digg!

Tagged as: torture, barack obama, department of justice, glenn greenwald, jose padilla, john yoo, enemy combatant, sensory deprivation, torture memos, mary mason

Liliana Segura is a staff writer and editor of AlterNet's Rights and Liberties and War on Iraq Special Coverage.


Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison?
The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers.
Post by Liliana Segura. November 9, 2009.
Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA
It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake.
Post by Ari Berman. November 9, 2009.
The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Devil
Posted by: QQOblivion on Mar 9, 2009 9:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Padilla doesn't realize how lucky he was...
to have at little contact as he had with the sadistic human trash that held him.

ANYONE, including President Obama, who would support the EVIL monster Yoo is worse than Padilla ever could be in the wildest of Dick Cheney's wet-dreams.

DAMN all those involved in the continued victimization of Jose Padilla! You are much worse than the Devil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JOSE PADILLA IS A CITIZEN OF THIS COUNTRY!
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 9, 2009 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He still has not been charged with anything directly related to terrorism. The whole "dirty bomb" scenario has been debunked. He wasn't charged for that. I believe the charges are "supporting Islamic terrorism." And what, exactly, does that mean? Really?

Last report I heard was that Mr. Padilla is now severely effected by these practices -- to the point that he cannot even participate in his own defense.

This is so disturbing, on so many levels, in so many ways. Atty. Gen. Holder needs to stop siding with that sick fuck Yoo, and allow this AMERICAN some semblance of justice! Enough! Enough!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dont get me wrong ..john yoo is a piece of shit...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Mar 9, 2009 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unfortunately..cases like this are next to impossible to prosecute in practice.. so the answer to the title ? is a flat NO...

that leaves it up to the legal profession to serve a measure of justice for mr padilla by disbarring yoo.. which is admittedly much less than he deserves..but prolly the best we can hope for...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

John Yoo is a Criminal
Posted by: Ohjin on Mar 10, 2009 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who through a completely twisted legal fantasy and creation assisted other criminals and needs to be prosecuted accordingly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe we have it wrong?
Posted by: jleman on Mar 10, 2009 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The govs position is that they have the "RIGHT" to torture and withhold habeas corpus from a citizen? But, as they are citizens, maybe they in turn should be picked up off of the streets and the same treatment done to them, just so we can learn the "truth" of what has gone on over the last eight years? After all, even if we don't find out "exactly" what occurred, they will be broken for the rest of their lives, and justice will be served.
We could start at the top of the last administration and work our way down, as they are just citizens now. We could even set up a "worker Tribunal" to "try" them. Guantanamo comes to mind. Keep the same sadistic guards and interrogators and put them to work on the last set of "Masters".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Terrytom: A deterrent
Posted by: terryton on Mar 10, 2009 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My understanding of the system is that soldiers answer to the highest level of moral conduct. If given orders that conflict with that highest moral authority they can and should refuse those orders. Sadly very little of that happens due to the enormous duty bound brainwashing and peer pressure to which they are subjected. If they did adhere to that higher moral authority we would never had more than a handful of misguided soldiers in Iraq and there never would have been these travesties of war and torture.
It does take some kind of sadistic sicko to carry out the torture.
I propose that we learn the names and addresses of everyone who in any way took part in his torture. Publish their pictures and names extensively across the nation and in heir hometowns or present places of dwelling. I sure want to know whom I might come in contact with. Sociopath persons are skilful in hiding their disorder. Some even become president. This kind of publicity may be a great deterrent to further immoral behavior.

Terrytom

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This case alone
Posted by: Bliss Doubt on Mar 10, 2009 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
shows that Obama is not serious about restoring the rule of law in our country. It would be nearly apolitical for him to let this case move forward on its own steam, yet he is trying to have it thrown out of court.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overseas
Posted by: Archie1954 on Mar 10, 2009 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Convicted of supporting "overseas" jihad? What is that? Does it mean that the only thing they could prove was that he "supported" some holy war in other countries, not in the US? Wow, what a letdown from what they originally arrested him for. I would have thought that his incarceration under the circumstances he had to endure would have been sufficient punishment for "supporting" war in other countries and places. After all the US, its former president and Congress supported wars in other places also and I don't see them tortured and inhabiting a jail cell for 17 years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Perhaps this conflicts with another agenda for justice?
Posted by: djnoll on Mar 10, 2009 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Make no mistake John Yoo and his bosses and co-workers should be locked up and the key thrown away. What they have condoned is inhuman and way outside the bounds of legal or constitutional laws. Perhaps Mr. Holder is put in the untenable position of defending this trash because there is something else going on that will have far greater ramifications, get the detainees their justice, and free Americans once and for all from the likes of these people.

John Yoo is just one of many, including the former President and Vice President, who should be in the Brig in South Carolina. However, to build such a case, you have to start by following a very convoluted trail of paper and electronic data. This takes time and often seems agonizingly slow to all concerned and the public. I suspect that this action right now could easily be not in defense of BushCo, but rather a way of laying the groundwork for something that will be more inclusive and much more successful, and for that John Yoo may need to bargain for something. Eric Holder's argument is weak, and he knows it. But, if he wants Yoo's cooperation in a bigger prosecution, he needs to make the effort, no matter how repugnant it is to him.

Watch closely how things go - the case will go forward, Yoo will lose, but Holder will then be able to say to him "I tried to help you, now you had better help me". Yoo will eventually be disbarred and fired by Berkley, but we need to be patient. BushCo did a lot of damage in 8 years to this nation, and it will take some time to tie it all together, but it will be done. Mr. Holder is no fool and neither is the President. Sometimes we need to remind ourselves that revenge is a dish best served cold. Americans want revenge, not just justice, and that takes real time to insure that it is complete and effective.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of all the cruel, evil, and despicable lies
Posted by: willymack on Mar 10, 2009 11:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Spewed by the bush crime family, labelling harmless, hapless people as "enemy combatants" has to rank near the top. Jose Padilla has reportedly been driven insane by a barrage of physical and mental abuse, and he's an AMERICAN CITIZEN. What about this being ILLEGAL and UN-AMERICAN don't people understand? This one case all by itself should be grounds for arresting the bush crime family, but, of course, this isn't the ONLY thing they should be arrested for, not by a long shot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why?
Posted by: motamanx6 on Mar 12, 2009 10:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why on earth would Obama want to stop a legitimate lawsuit against Yoo and his anti-American behavior?

This is disquieting. Could it be we have the same old same old all over again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]