Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Obama Goes to Work on 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell'

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 2:51 PM on March 3, 2009.


This sounds relatively encouraging, but it would be even better if we had a sense of how long the review process is going to take.
gaymilitary

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama acknowledged his intention to scrap "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." In January, Robert Gibbs reiterated the president's support for ending the ineffective and discriminatory policy.

And today, we learn that the White House has at least started a review process, though it's not entirely clear what kind of timeline may be in place.

The White House says President Barack Obama has begun consulting his top defense advisers on how to lift a ban on gays serving openly in the military.

"The president supports changing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell," [White House spokesman Tommy Vietor] said in the e-mailed statement.

"As part of a long-standing pledge," Obama has begun consulting closely with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Michael Mullen "so that this change is done in a sensible way that strengthens our armed forces and our national security," Vietor said.

That sounds relatively encouraging, but it would be even better if we had a sense of how long the review process is going to take. Indeed, the question itself isn't that complicated: should well-trained, physically-fit, law-abiding, patriotic American volunteers be allowed to serve in the military, regardless of sexual orientation, or not? Do we want to discharge capable U.S. servicemen and women in the midst of two wars, based on nothing but their sexual orientation, or is military readiness a higher priority than some misguided culture war?

The question, I suppose, is what the administration will replace DADT with, and formulating the details of the policy may take a little time. That this work has at least ostensibly begun is, I hope, an encouraging sign.

What's more, all of this comes on the heels of Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) introducing legislation yesterday to repeal DADT. Her measure garnered 148 co-sponsors in the last Congress -- including, by the way, some Republicans -- but wasn't brought to the floor for a vote.

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, military, don't ask don't tell, dadt, president obama, out ranks, rep. ellen tauscher

Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog, Political Animal. His background includes publishing The Carpetbagger Report, and writing for a variety of publications, including Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, and The Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's "Talk of the Nation," MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Air America Radio's "Sam Seder Show," and XM Radio's "POTUS '08."


Is It Cruel and Unusual to Sentence Teens to Die In Prison?
The Supreme Court is hearing two cases today that will affect the fate of more than 2,500 people sentenced to life without parole as teenagers.
Post by Liliana Segura. November 9, 2009.
Students Who Exposed 30-Year-Old Wrongful Conviction Being Targeted By Chicago DA
It's shocking that the state would rather keep an innocent man behind bars than admit a mistake.
Post by Ari Berman. November 9, 2009.
The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Replace Don't ask, don't tell with...
Posted by: chance garden on Mar 3, 2009 3:37 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....a little ACTION!

Maybe THAT would relieve the homophobes of their frustrations and deflect their misplaced anxieties onto boogies other than their very own compatriots, whom they MUST rely on to cover their backs!

Let me see....Who is the enemy today? Who shall be the enemy tomorrow?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Review"? Gee whiz, what a bold, bold thing to do!!
Posted by: rickiey on Mar 3, 2009 4:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh my god, President Obama is willing to "review" the don't ask don't tell policy!!

Gee, an official "review". Isn't that "special".

Whats to "review"? The official policy, is to discriminate against those who admit to liking the same sex. What exactly, is there to review and find out?

Come back to me when he DOES something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a wonderful thing for the gay community . . .
Posted by: dustdevil on Mar 4, 2009 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to even think about letting them serve openly in a military that is used to murder and plunder in weaker countries all over the world.

Gay people considering the military, please read this first:
War is a Racket

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US Military is in the middle of a serious and sober debate of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy
Posted by: Defenestrator on Mar 4, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These articles from Military.com:

Don't Ask Don't Tell Policy Costs Millions

Study: Gays Don't Harm Unit Cohesion

Survey: Most Recruits Don't Object To Gays In The Military

Other articles

Of course, If you read the comments section below these articles, there are many idiots... but many non-idiots as well. Many soldiers consider it an insult to say that they are so unprofessional as to be distracted by a fellow soldier's personal life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

leave it alone
Posted by: archivist on Mar 4, 2009 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All theory aside, if you have been in the military you know that gays are not comapatible with it at all. Even though they may be qualified you cannot prevent the reactions of the men. Don't ask Don't Tell is a practical solution to a copmplicated problem.

Above all there is no reason to mess with this as you will have no success. Some people may be ok with it but the military has a wide swath of personalites. You cannot have disruptions in moral or anything that distracts from the purpose of the military. It is simply not worth messing with this issue any further. Essentially it is for the physical protection of the gays that this policy is enacted and it is the best policy. If they want to serve than their relationaships are irrelavnt anyway so dont bring it up. This issue has a much greater charge than does race in the military which is actually worked out successfully at times amongst the men.

Obama will find that this policy was enacted for a reason. Nothing will change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: leave it alone Posted by: Frank J. Burris
» As Admiral St. Vincent said in 1801 Posted by: AdamSelene40
» RE: leave it alone Posted by: HillbillyRob