Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is Obama Leaving a Loophole for a 'Jack Bauer Exception' to His Torture Ban?

Posted by Ali Frick, Think Progress at 9:48 AM on January 23, 2009.


"I can say without exception or equivocation that the United States will not torture."
jack

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

Yesterday, President Obama signed an executive order banning the use of torture in all military and CIA interrogations of suspected terrorists. The order specifically revoked the legal memos written by the Bush administration to justify the use of torture on detainees.

Today, the Wall Street Journal editorializes that Obama "wants to have it both ways on torture," saying he will ban it but simultaneously carve out legal loopholes for coercive techniques to be used in an emergency:

The unfine print of Mr. Obama's order is that he's allowed room for what might be called a Jack Bauer exception. It creates a committee to study whether the Field Manual techniques are too limiting "when employed by departments or agencies outside the military." The Attorney General, Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Director of National Intelligence-designate Dennis Blair will report back and offer "additional or different guidance for other departments or agencies." [...]

The "special task force" may well grant the CIA more legal freedom to squeeze information out of terrorists when it could keep the country safe.

Despite the Wall Street Journal's foreboding intonations, Obama made it clear yesterday that the era of coercive interrogations had come to an end. Speaking to the State Department he said firmly, "I can say without exception or equivocation that the United States will not torture."

News organizations appeared skeptical of Obama's torture ban. The LA Times and the Washington Post noted that Obama "appeared to leave an opening for the CIA to again have expanded authority," but administration officials insisted that the commission set to review interrogation and detention policies was not a loophole to allow the use of torture:

Administration officials emphasized that there was no intent to create a loophole.

"This is not a secret annex that allows us to bring the enhanced interrogation techniques back," said a senior Obama administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity when discussing legal strategies. "It's not."

An administration official emphasized to the Washington Post, "We're not talking about different techniques."

Update: Greg Sargent notes that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) will continue to try to pass legislation specifically limiting CIA interrogations to the Army Field Manual. If passed, it would be more difficult to overturn than an executive order.

Digg!

Tagged as: torture, obama, guantanamo, wall street journal, jack bauer

Ali Frick is a Research Associate for The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.


The Ugly Politics of Mass Killings
Where's the liberal cover-up?
Post by Steve M.. November 7, 2009.
(VIDEO) More Torture by Taser: Cops Zap Man Offering No Resistance
This is part of such a clear pattern.
Post by Digby. November 7, 2009.
Right-Bloggers React to Fort Hood Exactly as Expected
Muuuuuuuuslim!
Post by Roy Edroso. November 6, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Did anyone notice the use of 'for now' when Obama spoke about this
Posted by: DCostello2 on Jan 23, 2009 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did. I don't doubt that Obama and others would like to have it both ways. Let's hope Feinstien gets her legislation passed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I guess it all comes down to whether or not President Obama
Posted by: Quannah on Jan 23, 2009 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
falls for the fear tactics of the last Junta. I see it this way... it's really very simple.

You either believe in the Rule of Law and govern accordingly, or you don't. Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BUSH OPENED A DOOR
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 23, 2009 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush did alot of things wrong and he's free as a bird. Once certain barriers are broken down they can't be rebuilt. Our standards were dragged down and I'm hoping that we can restore our image around the world, but sometimes "You can't go home". Obama should however keep his word. The new American disregard for human misery has to be addressed. We're becoming uncivilized. He has to start somewhere. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Army is torturing
Posted by: Liborio on Jan 23, 2009 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone can remember Iraq and nobody go to hail.
Then turture is OK for americans, maybe now we
can't see living torture in TV, but no more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Looks like Obama's a window-dresser
Posted by: jenko on Jan 26, 2009 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
aka, "Good Cop"

"The Torture Ban That Doesn't Ban Torture"
http://www.counterpunch.org/nairn01262009.html

and what about Bagram?

"Afghanistan's 'Guantanamo' poses new prison problem for Barack Obama"
http://tinyurl.com/d8g595

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]