Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How Obama Can Fix Another Bush Disaster: The War on Workers

Posted by Art Levine, In These Times at 1:23 PM on January 5, 2009.


It is up to Obama to help undo the damage eight years of George Bush did to American workers.
jwj

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Rights and Liberties in your
mailbox!

 

At year's end, President Bush and his spinmeisters, including the First Lady, defended his legacy from Iraq to Katrina. But scholars and progressives were united in their view that President Bush is one of of the worst Presidents in history.

Yet even as pundits have justly focused on the cataclysmic trifecta of Iraq, Katrina and the $7 trillion economic meltdown, there was another calamity that combined free-market zealotry, incompetence and indifference to public health and safety: the Bush Administration's War on Workers.

In its own six-part review of the "good news/bad news" year in labor, the AFL-CIO Now blog labeled Bush's government "the most anti-worker administration in U.S. history."

On virtually every front, the Labor Department that was supposed to protect workers' lives and paychecks did practically nothing to stop 6,000 workers from being killed on the job each year and prevent an estimated $19 billion from being stolen through corporate wage theft of overtime and minimum wage payments. As David Madland and Karla Walter of the Center for American Progress Action Fund pointed out recently:

Negligent firms often ignore these [workplace ] rules, and Bush's Department of Labor has shirked its role as top labor cop. Irresponsible employers know that they will be rarely penalized for workplace abuses, and when they are, penalties will likely be so low they will not hurt the firm's bottom line. In recent years, wage theft investigators assessed fines on only 6 percent of known lawbreakers. Moreover, in 2006 the average workplace safety penalty for serious violations that "pose a substantial probability of death or serious physical harm" was only $881...

The risk of employer abuse is especially high for workers in traditionally low-wage and potentially dangerous industries. According to recent reports, at least 50 percent of garment, nursing home, and poultry employers are in violation of the basic minimum wage and overtime protections...

And it's not only workers who get cheated. Employers who play by the rules and treat their workers with respect can't compete with irresponsible firms who cut corners with employee safety and wages.

On top of robbing workers of their pay, these rogue firms (including Wal-Mart, which just settled 63 wage theft cases) also steal from taxpayers, too. Madland and Walter note in their new report on immediate actions the Obama administration can take to protect workers, Enforcing Change: "Taxpayers are cheated out of $2.7 billion to $4.3 billion each year in Social Security, unemployment, and income taxes from just one type of workplace fraud that misclassifies employees as independent contractors."

While labor's top legislative priority is the long-overdue Employee Free Choice Act to give workers a level playing field to organize, there are several key steps Obama's new Secretary of Labor, Rep. Hilda Solis, can take right away to boost enforcement of current laws at a broken Labor Department and such slothful agencies as OSHA.

How bad was OSHA under Bush? The Washington Post reported last week a nearly 90 percent drop-off in major oversight actions because "political appointees ordered the withdrawal of dozens of workplace health regulations, slow-rolled others, and altered the reach of its warnings and rules in response to industry pressure."

In fact, OSHA's recent chief was a deregulation advocate who literally fell asleep on the job (at least "Brownie" at FEMA stayed awake long enough to primp himself for interviews):

In 2006, [John] Henshaw was replaced by Edwin G. Foulke Jr., a South Carolina lawyer and former Bush fundraiser who spent years defending companies cited by OSHA for safety and health violations.

Foulke quickly acquired a reputation inside the Labor Department as a man who literally fell asleep on the job: Eyewitnesses said they saw him suddenly doze off at staff meetings, during teleconferences, in one-on-one briefings, at retreats involving senior deputies, on the dais at a conference in Europe, at an award ceremony for a corporation and during an interview with a candidate for deputy regional administrator.

His top aides said they rustled papers, wore attention-getting garb, pounded the table for emphasis or gently kicked his leg, all to keep him awake...

It won't be easy fixing a Bush-led bureaucracy that couldn't care less if workers lived or died (or even get paid). But Madland and Walker outline five critical steps to toughen enforcement and accountability:

· Opportunity 1: Use penalties to create a culture of accountability.

· Opportunity 2: Increase enforcement staff and use partnerships to assist underfunded enforcement divisions.

· Opportunity 3: Target high-violation sectors with strategic initiatives.

· Opportunity 4: Use thorough record keeping to drive enforcement priorities, enhance public accountability, and improve performance evaluation.

· Opportunity 5: Strengthen immigrant protections to improve job quality for all workers.

But Bush's outgoing labor secretary never heard such calls for change, but still insists, like her President's latest PR campaign on behalf of his "legacy," that everything worked out just fine. She recently told the Los Angeles Times:

She said that much of the criticism of her stewardship misses the big picture. "Our workers today [are] safer and healthier than they were eight years ago. The facts speak for themselves," she said in a recent interview...

Many labor advocates say the results could be even better if the agency had taken a tougher approach toward employers. They also accuse Chao of using the agency's regulatory power to hamstring organized labor with new financial reporting requirements that unions call onerous.

Indeed, as the useful blog, Shameonelaine.org, run by American Rights at Work, points out: "Under Elaine's questionable 'leadership,' the Department of Labor has turned into an agency that screws America's workers and enables corporate giveaways."

So Hilda Solis truly has her work cut out for her. As the New York Times' editorial page observed:

The first and biggest test of Mr. Obama's commitment to labor, and to Ms. Solis, will be his decision on whether or not to push the Employee Free Choice Act in 2009. Corporate America is determined to derail the bill, which would make it easier than it has been for workers to form unions by requiring that employers recognize a union if a majority of employees at a workplace sign cards indicating they wish to organize...The measure is vital legislation and should not be postponed...

To enforce labor standards, the Labor Department will need more staff and more money, both of which have been cut deeply by President Bush. Only the president can give the new labor secretary the clout she will need to do well at a job that has been done so badly for so long, at such great cost to the quality of Americans' lives.

Now it's up to Obama to help undo the damage eight years of George Bush did to American workers.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, rights, obama, workers, wages, osha, workers' rights, war on workers, employee safety


Utah Lawmaker: I Don't Mind "the Gays," but "I Don’t Want ‘Em Stuffing it Down My Throat all the Time"
"Certainly not in my kid's face."
Post by Zaid Jilani. November 20, 2009.
Krauthammer Commits Terrorist Act on the Opinion Pages of the Washington Post
Terrorists terrorize -- it's what they do.
Post by Joshua Holland. November 20, 2009.
More Republicans Think Obama Stole an Election than Democrats Believe Bush Did
There were of course no remotely serious allegations that anything was amiss in 2008.
Post by Chris Bowers. November 20, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
I JUST THOUGHT OF SOME GOOD NEWS!
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jan 5, 2009 1:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain and Crazy Nanook of The North ARE NOT being sworn in on Jan. 20.Considering the onslaught of awful news I had to tell myself that things could be worse. And, Al Franken won. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right premise Wrong Persons
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jan 6, 2009 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh this war on Workers ahs been going on for DECADES!!
Being a MI'er, I grew up around the Union.These are the Pople which fueled our other industries...Going out to eat, buying boats, cottages,shopping at various malls. The 'Mangement' werre the ones who only dined at the Upscale resturants, bought foreign cars, Bought Villas in France, and Only Shopped in Birmingham and at Somerset Collection...They Did NOTHING to aid our economy. So when the Repugs began their attack upon the Workers in the late '70's & early '80's the adage became 'Last one out of MI, turn off the lights'...And here we go again.
We have cities that look like Ghost towns, literally buildings melting into the ground from years (decades) of Decay. Remember 'Roger & Me'?, Come see the Epilogue in Flint- approx 12% unemployment since the Closing of GM factories. We not only lost those jobs but industires and business which directly and Indirectly provided Goods & Services to those Workers.
Let's all thank Jimmy Hoffa et al, for perpetuating the Union/Mafia connection, it gave Repugs a great excuse to call all Union Workers Criminals and shysters. That's what helped Ronny begin his frontal attack on the Unions, and it has been a steady war ever since.But it's not the Unions so much as the ability to and Power of Organization. Through mass membership, mountains can be moved, Obama's election proved that. And that is Exactly what they have feared and been methodically working to derail.Repugs attacks are not just attacks on the Union, but on All american workers..Reason they LOVE WalMart & Toyota.Making Workers bargin for their Own INDIVIDUAL compensation package hedge your bet they can be undercut.Most people do not KNOW how to haggle for wages & bennies, and many are too desperate now to be particular...The Dream of All Corp CEO's and their CFO's...Cheap powerless Labor.
Don't give W credit for the War, he was just the latest puppet the Corps used to push their 30 yr agenda of conquering a Free Market democracy.Conquer US and the Worlds Your Oyster.It's been going on long before W and is far more intellectually complicated than W could ever comprehend...The man has brain damage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Continue the slide
Posted by: 2thepoint on Jan 6, 2009 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The hard fact is that the unions criminal history still continues.. They are more concerned with their power over our economy and government and all the benefits that entails then they are about the workers.

One look at GM's union contracts shows incompetence on the part of GM and criminal intent on the part of unions. The fleecing of a public company - running it into the ground costing investors billions!

There is a reason unions have been on the decline in this nation since Reagan. Most people realize how counter productive it is to force a company to provide for fired workers and put up with substandard workers. It's effects finally reared it's ugly head!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Continue the slide Posted by: QuestionAuthority
» RE: Continue the slide Posted by: LANCE
» RE: Continue the slide Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Continue the slide Posted by: sunlakedude
Edwin G. Foulke
Posted by: sunlakedude on Jan 6, 2009 12:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it's obvious that under the Bu$h regime the entire apparatus that is supposed to prevent employer abuse in the workplace has been "asleep" maybe Edwin Foulke has narcolepsy. Narcolepsy, also known as "sleeping sickness", renders it's victims unable to stay awake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Attack on workers
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jan 6, 2009 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The attack on workers IS an attack on Americas families. This began under St. Reagan and continues to this very day. The two religious leaders, now deceased, who put Reagan in the WH were at the forefront of attacking Americas families.

When their strategy became clear, that is when I knew the Moral Majority and the later Pro-Life and Family Values agenda was nothing more than a pile of bullshit. Exactly how can they attack families and the workers who support them and at the very same time scream Pro-Life and Family Values, while starving these families out of existence.

Also and by the same token; exactly how can they scream about supporting the life of the fetus when the mother who is carrying that fetus is starving or under nourished and needs the simple application of vitamins, folic acid and the most basic of health care to nourish that fetus.
No, this IS ALL about GREED.

Good grief people, are we stupid or what, that we have been taken in by these Religious Right phonies and charlatans. I don't know what their final agenda for America or the world really is, but I DO know what it is NOT. It is NOT Pro-Life and it is NOT Family Values. Of that, I am certain.

More than likely the RR's are just like all of their Republican brethren, they are really all about rampant, egregious, way-far over the top greedy, craven and depraved Capitalism. And nothing more than that.

We saw the economics that gave us WWII and we are yet again seeing the very same thing, and it is being done by the very same band of criminals and corrupters. WWII produced some sixty million dead back then. How many must die now, before we figure it out and stand up to the same cast of criminals and refuse to follow the script they have written for us, the little people, the powerless people?

We are asked to live by the social/civic/behavioral contracts they have written, but they NEVER live up to those contracts. They demand that the workers give up wages, the wages needed to just barely support their families. But they never demand that Big Corporations or Big Religions give up anything. Rampant greed stares us in the face and still we do not stare down the greedy beast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]