Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Girls Close the "Math Gap"

Posted by Lindsay Beyerstein, Majikthise at 9:38 AM on July 28, 2008.


Boys have long led girls in math scores, but that's no longer the case.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Reproductive Justice and Gender in your
mailbox!

 

Fifteen years ago, girls trailed boys by 50 points on SAT math scores. Today, the gap is gone:


But a new study, published in this week's edition of the journal Science, shows the gap has disappeared. Researchers looked at standardized test scores of more than 7 million students, ranging from the second grade to high school junior. Whatever gender differences there once existed between girls and boys in terms of math performance are gone.


"The differences are now trivial," said Janet Hyde, a professor of psychology and women's studies at the University of Wisconsin, who led the research. [ABC]

Science Journalism Tracker elaborates:


The news is that analysis of 7 million test scores by researchers at UC-Berkeley and the Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison found dramatic trends in recent decades. In the 70s, boys were ahead at all grade levels. By the 80s the girls kept even well into grade school. Now they're essentially tied, statistically, all the way through adolescence. One doesn't see many women's names in the roll of winners of the Fields Medal (sometimes called the Nobel of math) -- no obviously female names at all in a quick search just now. Maybe that's next. Unclear is how much of the gap's disappearance is due to boys scoring lower and to girls scoring higher. One difference remained. More boys are in the top one percent - but girls still make up one third of these elite scorers.

Watch the ABC video clip. Science subscribers can read the original paper here.

Digg!

Tagged as: math scores

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Will the Stupak Amendment Force Women Who've Miscarried to Lose Insurance Coverage?
I think so.
Post by Robin Marty. November 9, 2009.
Pretentious Scold Bernard-Henri Lévy Decries "Lynching" of Roman Polanski
"Why don't we hear these intellectuals denounce with equal ardor ... the martyrdom of child soldiers in Africa, or child slaves in Asia?"
Post by . November 9, 2009.
Anti-Woman Amendment to Health Care Passes House
The Stupak amendment -- an anti-choice measure that could virtually eliminate insurance coverage for abortion -- will be attached to the health-care reform bill.
Post by Adele Stan. November 7, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
never bought into
Posted by: Joe on Jul 28, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i never bought into the "girls/females/women are behind in....." media reports that the left lives by.

any females that has sons need to be way more concerned about them...but that's not politically correct.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a surprise
Posted by: Cruella on Jul 28, 2008 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess women aren't just "naturally" stupid and incapable at maths then. Would someone please tell these people?!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reminds me of the old joke...
Posted by: realist on Jul 28, 2008 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that the reason girls weren't as good as boys at math was because boys convinced girls that three inches was six inches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well
Posted by: Cwood on Jul 28, 2008 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously, they're witches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]