Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Internet Assisted Abortion: Coathangers of the Digital Age?

Posted by Lauren, Feministe at 12:55 PM on July 22, 2008.


Women in areas where abortion is illegal or near-illegal are resorting to buying medication online to terminate their pregnancies at home.
womeninternet300x225

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Reproductive Justice and Gender in your
mailbox!

 

Women in areas where abortion is illegal or near-illegal are resorting to the internet to buy medication that allows them to terminate their pregnancies at home.

Most of the women indicated in the article report they were "grateful" or found it "stressful but acceptable" that they were able to get medical abortions by this route, although about 11% needed surgical procedures after taking the medication because of incomplete abortion or excessive bleeding. Anti-abortion activists express regret that these women no longer need to walk through picket lines or die in cheap motel rooms to suffer properly for their sins, but methinks the ethics of the issue may be easily resolved by removing arbitrary restrictions against the procedure that force women to break the law in order to control the rate and frequency at which their bodies spawn.

As long as pregnancy exists, so abortion shall exist.

Much of this article reads like moralistic hand-wringing, but I'm concerned that the cycle of drugs that takes several days to complete is handed out to self-reporting individuals, most of whom have little to no medical experience.

I can't attest to the risk-levels of this kind of DIY reproductive health, but I imagine that it's as harmful as being able to order vanity drugs or painkillers online. Thoughts?


McCain Voted to Protect Domestic Terrorists
McCain has repeatedly voted against protecting Americans from domestic terrorists in the anti-choice movement.
Post by Ryan Powers. October 7, 2008.
About those "Rape Exceptions" in Proposed South Dakota Abortion Ban...
Reframing a woman’s choice to not report her rape as empowering to her.
Post by Cara . October 7, 2008.
Women Ignored in VP Debate
In the end, women will swing this election. Might be a good moment to start speaking to them. And a cursory nod to women's rights isn't enough.
Post by Ruth Rosen. October 3, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is What Women Need!
Posted by: terradea42 on Jul 23, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Privacy. Pure and simple. The drugs and the devices available online will be perfected over time. Women need to take control of their own situation and keep everyone else out of it. We must come up with a way to help women do this themselves without reliance on doctors, many of whom are put at risk for helping these women in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

concerned, but not surprised
Posted by: luzmejor on Jul 23, 2008 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Physicians have been repeatedly warned that there will be consequences if or when they help women in any way when it comes to necessary gynecological procedures.

Many of them will refuse to treat women who have difficult pregnancies or will walk away from them if they show any signs of a difficult or abnormal pregnancy that fanatics will label an attempted abortion.

These perpetual anti-Christian myths, raised in some backward churches, are imposed on the public by people who feel guilty about their own past histories and desire now to label everyone else a "killer," so they can feel better about their own neuroses.

I do believe such brutal chauvinists want nothing better than to have "honor" killings here, just as they do in the Muslim countries.

Because the Republican Party has attacked key constitutional rights here in the USA, they just might get their wishes granted by the Supreme Court. Family members who love and respect their female relatives, Beware!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

'IF EVERYBODY WOULD MIND THEIR OWN BUSINESS THE WORLD WOULD HAVE A LOT FEWER
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 26, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
problems'. Will Rogers attribution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]