Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Gender Policing is Harmful to Children

Posted by Habladora, Feministe at 11:00 AM on July 18, 2008.


"It isn't being different that put kids at risk, it's being punished for being different."
kid

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Reproductive Justice and Gender in your
mailbox!

 

My good friend recently confessed that she wished her eight-year-old daughter were more interested in 'fashionable' shoes, lamenting that little Maria always insists on wearing sneakers- even with skirts. "Some day soon," my friend comforted herself, "Maria will want to be more like a girl -- she'll want to wear make-up, and shoes that compliment her outfits. I guess she's still just a little young for all that."

In light of that remark, I should have known when I agreed to babysit that Maria would show-up wearing shoes that limited her mobility. Had I been thinking of that conversation with her mother while arranging our day together, I could have saved the kid some pain. Instead, I thought of my own sneakered childhood, and planned to tour the neighborhood playgrounds, gardens, libraries, and ice-cream parlors with her -- on foot. Since I don't usually think of eight-year-olds wearing high-heels (although it seems to be a growing phenomenon), I didn't even notice Maria's 'fashionable' shoes until the poor kid started complaining of blisters and aching feet. Her mom had bought her the 'pretty grown-up shoes' the day before, and told her that big girls don't wear tennis shoes with skirts.

Little Maria's feet had fallen victim to gender-policing, the imposing of perceived 'typical' gender behaviors on another person.

As it turns out, gender policing is far from rare, and any kid who escapes adolescence with just a few blisters as a result can count herself lucky. According to research published in the journal Sex Roles, kids who's parents over-correct " ... gender atypical behavior (GAB) i.e. behavior traditionally considered more typical for children of the opposite sex" are at greater risk of developing adverse adult psychiatric symptoms:

Negative parenting style was associated with psychiatric symptoms. Structural equation modeling showed that parenting style significantly moderated the association between childhood GAB and adult psychiatric symptoms with positive parenting reducing the association and negative parenting sustaining it.

To put it a bit more succinctly, it isn't being different that put kids at risk, it's being punished for being different.

We are constantly goading kids, in a variety of ways, to conform to culturally-set gender roles. The rules can be so strict, that crossing a gender line can earn a kid punishment from parents, teachers, and peers. This hostile situation makes life particularly difficult for transgender children, for at an age when all children are seeking to define themselves, transgender kids are torn between embracing behaviors usually aligned with the sex they know themselves to be, and those behaviors that their society expects them to adopt. The more 'gender atypical behaviors' a child displays, the more severe the gender policing tends to be -- increasing those children's risks.

Yet, even for kids who identify strongly with their birth sex, gender policing can cause lasting problems. Girls run a constant risk of being taught to associating femininity with frivolousness, and we might be teaching boys a form of subtle misogyny as well. As Sociological Images notes, "unlike men, who are supposed to reject all things feminine, women are encouraged to balance masculine and feminine characteristics."

NPR's article "Two Families Grapple with Sons' Gender Preferences" seems to give credibility to this assertion. While the boys who name their animals girl's names, identify with female characters in movies, and want to wear skirts might get taken to a psychiatrist; girls are expected to identify with male characters in movies (when there might not be any female ones), can wear only slacks (I refused skirts and dresses for years), and are free to name their stuffed bears whatever they'd like (mine was Tom). The implication that girls can aspire to be male, but that boys shouldn't condescend to act like girls is disturbing.

Of course, being aware of the problem doesn't always solve it -- and I'm even guilty of occasionally trying to police my nieces away from frilly versions of femininity. Knowing that gender policing is potentially dangerous for kids, how do we let our children explore their gender identities in their own ways -- despite the messages all around them implying that anything but strict adherence to their prescribed gender roles is bad, or even unsafe?


How Effective Is the HPV Vaccine?
The New England Journal of Medicine raises some serious questions about the vaccine's safety and effectiveness.
Post by Lucinda Marshall. August 26, 2008.
McCain Surrogate Falsely Suggests McCain Does Not Want To Overturn Roe
More multi-messaging from team McCain.
Post by Faiz Shakir. August 25, 2008.
McCain Backs Down: Decides to Flip Flop on Abortion
I doubt even most conservatives think that a woman's life should be sacrificed in favor of a fetus, much less normal people.
Post by Digby. August 21, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
High heels for 8 year olds?????
Posted by: Artkansas on Jul 18, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's not gender policing, that's child abuse.

Let's start destroying her feet before they even finish growing. That's disgusting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sissies vs tomboys
Posted by: LeeAnnG on Jul 18, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not news that it's generally considered OK, if not even cute, for girls to be "tomboys." It's almost a term of endearment or at least tolerance. But call a boy a "sissy," and you are likely to be torn apart by the child's father.

A girl who wears jeans and t-shirts is part of the norm, but a boy who wears a skirt is on the edge of the envelope. Girls are routinely given traditionally male-sounding names. Note the number of women on TV shows with names like Sam, Alex, or Jamie. But imagine giving a boy a name like Beverly (an actual boy's name at one time in the UK) or Mary. The child would probably be subjected to intense ridicule. Like the boy named Sue. It's no accident that there are no songs about A Girl Named George. In fact, I had a friend whose name was really and truly George, and she was named after her mother!

If a woman shows courage, she's "got balls." This is a high compliment. Note that many posters here comment that Nancy Pelosi needs to "grow some balls." But if a man is weak, he's "a pussy." Not a compliment. Anyone reading this ever hear anyone say, "the problem with him is he needs to grow some ovaries"?

I play poker regularly with guys who just love the opportunity to say someone "shows some balls" or even better "big balls" by taking a gamble. But when some of the women began saying "we don't need balls, we have big ovaries," it was great for a laugh from some of the more knuckle-dragging players.

Although it's true that some people try to steer their little girls into more "feminine" dress and behavior, it's a lot more common to insist that boys act like little men. I have a family member who is so paranoid about his son's masculinity, he almost went into a panic when I called the child Nicky instead of Nick. It was as if I'd insulted him and called him a girl. (This guy thinks Ryan is a girl's name and can't imagine why anyone would damage a male child by giving him this name.)

Ours is a society in which, generally speaking, it's good to be male and not-quite-so-good to be female. Note that calling someone a "man's man" because he prefers the company of men socially to women is, or was at least until very recently, far from being an insult. Men who really don't like women very much are not greatly disparaged. But any woman who shows the least inclination to dislike being subservient to men is often labeled a "man-hater" or "dyke."

Charles Schultz, creator of Peanuts, once said that the reason Lucy and Charlie Brown were funny is that humor turns truth on its head and is often the opposite of how things really are. He said it would not be funny for Charlie Brown to pull the football out from under Lucy because that's too close to the truth in real life. It's why calling a man "henpecked" is often considered humorous, but there's no common humorous term for a woman who is dominated by a man. Henpecked is outside the norm, but "wearing the pants in the family" is admirable.

Yes, these are generalizations, and many of the men reading Alternet don't fit the stereotype. I am blessed with my husband and men friends who are not concerned with proving or protecting their masculinity. However, the American cultural standard is still the white male.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sissies vs tomboys Posted by: leta
» RE: Sissies vs tomboys Posted by: Eln
» RE: Sissies vs tomboys Posted by: gregii
an all too rare "Aha" moment
Posted by: gregii on Jul 20, 2008 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"It isn't being different that put kids at risk, it's being punished for being different."

Once in a while, an insight so succinct as to remind me why I continue reading.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]