Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Pro-Choicers Could Swing the Election

Posted by Booman at 1:55 AM on June 18, 2008.


McCain's hardline anti-abortion stance may alienate key supporters.
mccainprolife

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Reproductive Justice and Gender in your
mailbox!

 

Via Taegan Goddard:

A new Greenberg Quinlan Rosner poll commissioned by NARAL finds that once "balanced information" about Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. John McCain's respective positions on abortion are introduced, Obama gains 6 points nationally, with his lead in battleground states expanding from a net 2 points (47% to 45%) to a net 13 points (53% to 40%).

Other key finding: "Despite the fact that the national focus seems to be on the economy, among pro-choice Independent women, pro-choice Republican women, and liberal to moderate Republican women, the issue of abortion produces a larger advantage for Democrats than the economy, the war in Iraq, or health care."

For a long time I've thought that McCain's only chance to get a bang for his buck out of his vice-presidential pick is for him to select a pro-choice running mate. Robert Novak mentioned two pro-choice possibilities in a recent Townhall piece:

Sources close to Sen. John McCain say the Republican presidential candidate likes the idea of Democratic Sen. Joseph Lieberman, re-elected from Connecticut as an independent in 2006, or former Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge -- if he could get away with it. The political consensus is that McCain couldn't get away with either, and he knows it.

I really don't understand why he can't get away with it. As the polling at the top shows, McCain has a serious liability in his extreme anti-choice voting record. The Republican base has shrunk to such a small rump that McCain is losing national polls even though he runs stronger with self-identified Republicans than Obama does with self-identified Democrats. McCain's natural constituency simply is not the same as George W. Bush's. McCain has a much better chance of winning New Hampshire, Connecticut, and New Jersey than he does of winning Minnesota, Iowa, and Oregon. He has to expand his map somewhere, but he can't attract northeastern voters by picking some southern anti-choice governor. He'd get more bang for his buck out of picking Olympia Snowe, Christie Todd Whitman, Jodi Rell, Tom Ridge, or George Pataki than he'd get out of Haley Barbour or Mark Sanford. At least, I t

Digg!

Tagged as: obama, mccain, republican, women, vote, abortion, pro-choice

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.


Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
McCain Campaign Spins Sarah Palin's Teen Daughter's Pregnancy
Much ado about choice.
Post by Steve Benen. September 1, 2008.
Raids on Protesters at RNC: Amy Goodman Jumps Fence to Question Police (Video)
Footage of one of many police actions ahead of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul.
Post by The Uptake and Democracy Now. August 31, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
JoshuasGrandma
Posted by: Jo1028 on Jun 18, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain would really do well to pick SC Gov Mark Sanford...then we'd have two blithering idiots heading the GOP camp!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pro-Life & Free Choice
Posted by: billgee on Jun 18, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do those words seem so anachronistic

and misanthropic

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pro-Life & Free Choice Posted by: Bibsisis
I think all of those pissed-off women who
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 18, 2008 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
supported Hillary are thinking about what a John McStain presidency would mean...

The SCOTUS is one vote away from overturning Roe vs. Wade and McStain already said he would appoint Justices like Scalia, Roberts, Alito and Thomas. And most Democratic women support a woman's right to choose.

If that doesn't scare them into voting for Obama, nothing will!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When its all said and done
Posted by: Sissy on Jun 19, 2008 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I personally do not believe any of the republican candidates give a rip about what women do with their own personal lives. McCain like Bush, Cheney, et al, are playing to their base which they believe still have so much power and influence over the electorate. If they had cared at all about this one issue, they would have implemented or worked for affordable health care, education, labor, all those important factors in the American family life. Instead they stand behind the Bowers, Perkins, the late, "great" Falwell, etc., who have piously intoned the Right to Life mantra, giving little heed to that child once its born.

Through the years I have never ceased to be astonished at their Holier than Thou admonishment for the sanctity of life while sending the already born to wars, cut programs to feed the hungry, or give medical care.

The McCain campaign continues to play on what has been so successful in the past. Scare the hell out of the public with their terror rhetoric, blast "activist judges" and promise the end of Roe vs. Wade. That's what brought out the voters in the past while far too many stayed home. They can't get their arms around the fact that for the first time in at least my voting lifetime, "it ain't working" and maybe they'll have to find a new schtick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: When its all said and done Posted by: Bibsisis
I do not and would not want McCain anywhere near my children.
Posted by: Nightstallion on Jun 19, 2008 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You may say what ever you will. This man is a monster as bad or worse than Geo. Bush. Only someone who is too drunk to see would vote for him after some of the tirades I have heard from him on the air or in the News Stand.

Please, Republicans, pretend like you have a brain here instead of an attaboy box. Obama is not a bad guy and he is not perfect. However, his worst is so much better than McCains best that I will vote for him just to keep McCain out of Office.

I still say we are missing a bet by not Getting Jimmy Carter & Ron Paul to run together. Hell, I would even vote for Bonzo over McCain, he was more even tempered and did not talk too much!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

smell the butchers
Posted by: gregii on Jun 19, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our electorate needs to take some time this summer to inform themselves of the reality of this and recent elections: the barbarians have taken over and it is totally the fault of an ignorant electorate allowing the barbarians to manipulate their emotions by pandering to their basest instincts while deceiving them on the issues. Actually easy to see with just a little more information than what 30 minutes of network corporate favored news delivers each evening. Perhaps the pain of gasoline prices will force them to pay a little more attention?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]