Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

A (Graceful) Exit Strategy for Clinton

Posted by Katrina Vanden Heuvel, The Nation at 4:04 PM on June 3, 2008.


The anger of Clinton supporters should be channeled at the media, not Senator Obama.
senatorclinton2

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Reproductive Justice and Gender in your
mailbox!

 

A week ago I expressed my hope that Senator Hillary Clinton would exit this historic race, gracefully, with dignity, after the last primaries today. A smart op-ed by Anna Holmes in the New York Times this past Sunday suggests one way Clinton might manage to do just that – starting with a speech that offers an expansive message for all women – especially for a future generation of women who could be energized and moved by her campaign, rather than deflated by it.

Holmes argues, "Of course there's been sexism throughout this campaign…. But at this point, keeping track of every tone-deaf criticism matters less than delivering an active, impassioned response. Senator Clinton is the one woman in America right now who has the perspective, and the responsibility, to give that response."

Senator Clinton could deliver a rousing speech that challenges us to examine the structural sexism in our media, culture and politics. She could challenge the media to bring on more women of all ages, races, and views, as Washington Post ombudsman Deborah Howell recently called on her newspaper to do.

While there has been a laser-like focus on the resentment between the Clinton and Obama camps, what is hopeful about moving forward is that the resentment – or even rage felt by some of Clinton's most ardent supporters – is directed in large part toward media sexism rather than Senator Barack Obama's candidacy. And that is as it should be, because if we're going to build a strong progressive coalition, and rebuild this nation, we must stand together. That means refusing to engage in what some have called "the oppression sweepstakes." It also requires a capacity to see race and gender in multi-dimensional terms. "The real question," as Shankar Vedantam writes

in the Washington Post, "… comes down to whether groups that face discrimination focus their disappointment and resentment at discrimination – or at each other." As Betsy Reed wrote in a recent Nation cover story, "sexism may be more casually accepted [while] racism, which is often coded, is more insidious and trickier to confront."

As passions cool, and Clinton supporters refocus on what is at stake in this pivotal election, there's an enormous opening for Senator Obama to win back these voters. He has already started speaking concretely to women's issues broadly defined (as they should be): the economy, healthcare, education, ending the war. And who in their right mind could support McCain when it comes to issues which will improve women's lives – across class and race?

And in the months and years ahead, Senator Clinton could highlight policies that challenge structural sexism – whether with regard to women's reproductive rights and healthcare, or pay equity and equal access to positions of power. She could become a bold leader in the Senate on issues of health, education, women's rights, civil rights, labor rights and the many issues that impact the lives of women.

This historic campaign of rousing highs and distressing lows has vividly illustrated the need for a true dialogue on sexism and gender – one that would counter Geraldine Ferraro's venomous and wrongheaded comments in her Boston Globe op-ed

, and speak to the kind of yearning and new energy described by Amanda Fortini in a New York magazine article, "The past few months have been like an extended consciousness-raising session, to use a retro phrase that would have once made most of us cringe. We've parsed the gender politics of the campaign with other women in the office, at parties, over e-mail, and now we're starting to parse the gender politics of our lives. This is, admittedly, depressing: How can we be confronting the same issues, all these years later? But it's also exciting. It feels as if a window has been opened in a stuffy, long-sealed room. There is a thrill at the collective realization. Now the question is, what next?"

Senator Clinton can make an important contribution in the years ahead by speaking with conviction and passion about sexism in American life.

Digg!

Tagged as: women, sexism, clinton


FOX's Ugly Sexism Toward Hillary Clinton
Watch's FOX's standard of decency hit a new low.
Post by ZP Heller. October 9, 2008.
McCain Voted to Protect Domestic Terrorists
McCain has repeatedly voted against protecting Americans from domestic terrorists in the anti-choice movement.
Post by Ryan Powers. October 7, 2008.
About those "Rape Exceptions" in Proposed South Dakota Abortion Ban...
Reframing a woman’s choice to not report her rape as empowering to her.
Post by Cara . October 7, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Graceless
Posted by: bessie on Jun 3, 2008 10:13 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary demonstrated a total lack of grace tonight, of course, when faced with Obama's nomination. There are words that most of us understand like "Congratulations". Times when your friends & loved ones find love first or have children first or make a better career move, we might feel some sadness for ourselves, but we, also, manage to say something kind with the understanding that life isn't always equal and we all win and lose in different ways at different times. What can you say when you watch Hillary so badly fumble with a basic situation? She's not an example of anyone who can direct a conversation about sexism or racism. Why? She's totally unable to transcend her ego towards a greater humanity. On this historic night when Obama secured the nomination, Hillary had a choice to be dignified and to acknowledge the reality of this unbelievable event. She chose to promote the divisions of this primary season and to emphasize her Hillary math based on a one candidate ballot. There are many who voted for Hillary but let's not forget how long this primary season has been. There are many voters now who have learned more about Obama & are rightfully impressed with his ability to unite, to communicate our issues, and to solve our problems. It's time to respect the graceful among us & to ignore the idea that dishonest egotists have anything contribute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Graceful --
Posted by: Jeanne on Jun 3, 2008 10:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope so. It has been reported that Hillary Clinton is "open" to the Vice Presidential nomination. My reaction to the report of her fishing for the VP job was, "Oh, no." My 18-yr old first time voting offspring's reaction was visceral, and extremely negative. I realize there is some time before the selection will be made. Perhaps this is part of a choreography that will allow Clinton to exit gracefully. But, much as John Kennedy wound up with Lyndon Johnson as his running mate out of a sense of etiquette which compelled him to offer the selection to Johnson, whose acceptance of the nomination was unexpected and shocking; Obama may wind up with the Clinton albatross around his candidacy. This must not happen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Graceful -- Posted by: bessie
» RE: Graceful -- Posted by: anna132
Instructive.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 4, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it's almost always easy to calculate the bottom line regarding how much it costs to buy an election, Clinton offers us a rare opportunity to appreciate how much it costs to lose one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Instructive. Posted by: VZEQICVA
fed up...
Posted by: LeeW on Jun 4, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... with both the racist and sexist BS in this primary. At this point, I don't care who the mouthpiece is, I only care about what the mouth is saying.

As a woman, if I don't see some serious feminist planks in the party platform, I'm going elsewhere. If four more years of Republican rule is what it takes to wake up the DNC, then so be it.

The dems have kicked back and watched women stripped of the advances made by the women's movement. State after state rolls back a woman's right to control her own body and sexuality and the dems do nothing.

BushCo has been trying to rule the country by fear: watch out for the terrorists! The DNC is trying to rule women by fear: watch out for the Republicans!

The time for fear is over. It's time to be angry again. And if the DNC doesn't wake up and seriously address women's issues we need to find a party and a candidate who does.

Voting for McCain out of spite is self-defeating, but it looks like Cynthia McKinney is going to be the Green candidate. If she is, I will be looking seriously at voting for her.

You will say that I am "throwing away" my vote. I say that voting for the lesser of two evils is still a vote for evil and I cannot bring myself to vote for my own oppression.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: fed up... Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: fed up... Posted by: LeeW
» RE: fed up... Posted by: Tombo
» RE: fed up... Posted by: LeeW
» RE: fed up... Posted by: mnascimento
» RE: fed up... Posted by: LeeW
» RE: fed up... Posted by: davewuxi
» RE: fed up... Posted by: LeeW
EGGSHELLS
Posted by: crazy carlos on Jun 4, 2008 8:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many mixed thoughts and feelings about Obama and Hillary and where this country stands. I am an older white male and neither of the above was even on my radar when this session started. I was sceptical of Obama because of his relative inexperience in foreign affairs. Hillary I dismissed for her overt pandering to the Jewish vote which in my opinion is the Democialican sword hanging over U.S. politics. We must not allow this entity of APIAC be the tail that wags the dog any longer. That was the defining matter to me--not her sex. Hillary is one tough, smart lady and if she uses this moment to blast those who need it,the media for their hand in her 2nd place finish I would be the first to say Right on!! She belongs somewhere in the progression of this nation from the hell hole it has been placed in By the thiefs of Wall Street and the Federal Reserve.( Ron Paul for Treasury)There is plenty of talent in place but critical blockers like Pelosi need to be removed from power.

There are many other thought flowing through my head--but this is for remarks not books. Obama needs to keep some sense of idealism and hope in his atempt to move this country out of the horifying death spiral we and the world are headed--and we very much need the contributions thast Hillary can bring to the table. Crazy Carlos

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: GGSHELLS Posted by: davewuxi
Graceless, classless, clueless
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Jun 4, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the trifecta.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please don't worry
Posted by: foreverhope on Jun 4, 2008 10:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is more than capable of dealing with Hillary. I voted for him and support him because I have tremendous unwavering confidence in his over-all leadership abilities and keen decision making process and the quality of the people he keeps round him. He knows what to do and he will do it, he has much tougher tasks ahead, we know it. He has lots of good smart people to help him deal. After all, they helped him get this far.

REMEMBER: it is a 'twofer'. BOTH CLINTONS must be made happy and I don't think anything can make them happy now. Their world has been turned upside down, they are reeling. The dem leadership will tell them nicely or not so nicely to shut the hell up or be tossed out of their own party. I think there are lots of people in the dem leadership that are more than a bit fed up with The Clintons reprehensible campaign tactics and many others rightly offended by their attitude of entitlement.

Charlie Rengal, one of her biggest supporters, is on msnbc now sounding gobsmacked himself at not only Hillary's refusal to concede, but also demands to be Barack's VP whether he likes it or not. Rengal says Hillary is really putting Obama in a very difficult position and it is no strategy to win in November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Media got its' choice - so much for the regular guy
Posted by: jeanmo on Jun 4, 2008 3:26 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess the media can pick the candidate - spread negative information, refuse to cover the opposition's campaign, build up the candidate of choice to look heroic - despite having done nothing to show credentials - and voila- the people will fall in line

They did it to Edwards, and now Hillary - and soon they will turn on Obama - and poof - another 4 years of republicans

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VICE PREEZ
Posted by: mindtrvlr on Jun 4, 2008 5:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NcCain should ask Hillary to run as his V.P.. Wouldn't that be an interesting development??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: VICE PREEZ Posted by: Schroeder
Sick of it all
Posted by: Schroeder on Jun 4, 2008 9:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who are able to recognize that about 18 million Americans support Hillary Clinton have made statements which can be successful in bringing about healing and a path forward for America. Those who continue to spew hatred and animosity toward Hillary Clinton will be the barriers to that healing. Is that what you really want?

Whether you like her and supported her really doesn't matter. Like it or not, you ALL have to be a part of the healing process. And it has to start now.

Barack Obama never had to say hateful things about Hillary. There were enough of his supporters who were willing to do that. And, yes, there have been supporters of Clinton who were equally negative but I think you overlook one significant issue. The corporate media has been all too happy to look for anything they could use to criticize Hillary about, complete with determining what she should have said last night. I expected nothing more from them.

We allowed the media to push us (by catapulting the Bush rhetoric) into a war with Iraq. The media continues to push toward a division in the Democratic party. They have been happy to continue to spread the fear mongering of this administration by never asking the tough questions. They want to hear nothing positive about the Clintons...they want to give no credit to the real accomplishments of Hillary in this campaign. They will continue to split the democratic party and we will have four more years of Bush in McCain if we allow it.

How about standing up to insist that the media begin to be fair? Remember how you felt when the media was totally pro Bush and the democrats couldn't get on any of the Sunday talk shows without at least 3 Republicans to 1 Democrat? The media wants to provide entertainment, not news! And that is okay with us if what they are doing supports what we happen to be in favor of at the time. But what happens when that is not the case? Enough people!

Those of you who would insist that Hillary and McCain are alike do not have a CLUE what she stands for and in what she believes.

It is my belief that the media helped to pave the way for Obama. Those of us who are thinking about what is best for America, even though we support Hillary Clinton want healing to begin in our party. We want accountability. For everyone.

So, stop the name calling and the criticism of Hillary! She doesn't deserve it. I have read enough Clinton hatred to last a lifetime. Guess it's not surprising that McCain says "my friends, there will be other wars". We cannot even have a civil debate about real issues.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You are so right on about that .
Posted by: anneliese-nyc on Jun 5, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For some reason people who own the media did not want Hillary . Her campaign from the onset was damned to be negative .Almost always shown negatively and always second to the "answer to America Obama .)AND , most Americans being what they are(which is not much nowadays)were too busy to "stop, look and listen" to see the hype against Hillary .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Thanks to you, Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Posted by: mboerner on Jun 5, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You say the anger of Clinton supporters should be channeled at the media, not Senator Obama. But most -- like those in the Nation and in particular in its comments -- have made the most awful sexist and ad hominem attacks on HRC. Why is it that these "Democrats" for Obama have talked like a Republican attack ad? Did they think we would not notice because we were too attached to the "old ways" to use the web? Isn't it about time that BHO's supporters apologized to HRC?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]