Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Senate Candidate Wants to Change His Name to "Pro-Life"
A report from Idaho indicates that U.S. Senate candidate Marvin Richardson legally changed his name to Marvin Pro-Life Richardson.
This seemed weird at first glance -- but why not get all anti-abortion legislators to change their names? And then mandate that all anti-abortion legislation change names to add "anti-abortion," or heck, even "pro-life"? Now that would be informed consent!
As synopsized by National Partnership for Women and Families, here's the deal with Marvin Pro-Life. (Pro-Life, by the way, is running for the seat of Larry Craig, who is most recently known for for his encounter with an airport men's room.)
An Idaho candidate for the U.S. Senate has legally changed his name to Pro-Life, the AP/CBS News reports. The man attempted to appear on a 2006 ballot as Marvin Pro-Life Richardson when he unsuccessfully ran for governor, but the state's policy prohibits slogans from appearing on the ballot. However, officials in the Idaho Office of the Secretary of State have said they have no choice but to allow Pro-Life to be on the 2008 ballot because it is now the candidate's full legal name (AP/CBS News, 3/18).
Idaho Secretary of State Ben Ysursa (R) at a state Senate committee hearing Monday advocated for legislation (S 1514) that would require candidates who change their name to a political slogan to have a parenthetical note after the name on the ballot that states "A person formerly known as ..."But wait ... if this were applied across the board, we could have John Pro-Life McCain running for President ... and there would be no confusion for the pro-choice majority. We wouldn't have to worry when he makes his comments obscure and coded, as George W. Bush did. Everyone would know, flat-out, where McCain stands.
And the Colorado group that is now trying to get a ballot measure that would result in a complete abortion ban could change its name from "Colorado for Equal Rights" to "Colorado for Equal Pro-Life Rights."
Or, finally, if legislation were forced to have this middle name imagine the improvement. Anti-choice legislation would be newly illuminated. Instead of Senator Brownback's "Ultrasound Informed Consent Act" (S 2075), we would have the Ultrasound Pro-Life Informed Consent Act.
Hey, Marv Pro-Life ... you're really onto something. Thanks for the notion!
| Also in Reproductive Justice and Gender | |||
| Everyone's Talking About Stupak, But What About the Health Care Bill's More Insidious Features? The current bill involves some quietly coercive (and racist) provisions that no one wants to mention. Post by Jill Filipovic. November 24, 2009. |
Is Taxing Plastic Surgery Sexist? Part of the funding for the Senate's health care bill will come from a 5 percent tax on cosmetic surgery, on procedures overwhelmingly obtained by women. Post by Jill Filipovic. November 23, 2009. |
Utah Lawmaker: I Don't Mind "the Gays," but "I Don’t Want ‘Em Stuffing it Down My Throat all the Time" "Certainly not in my kid's face." Post by Zaid Jilani. November 20, 2009. |
|