Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Porn Candidate

Posted by Linda Hirshman, AlterNet at 6:19 AM on February 14, 2008.


Maureen Dowd's ideal female candidate would have an easier time than the real female candidate running, because her candidate is not a real person.
recallmarycarey

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Reproductive Justice and Gender in your
mailbox!

 

Whaddaya know? This morning, as a thought experiment, Maureen Dowd contemplated a woman making a successful run for President. She'd like that, she says. She even hopes the "male reporters" in the media would behave if it ever happened. Presumably she includes herself in that group.

Dowd's candidate would have an easier time than the real female candidate running, because Dowd's candidate is not a real person, but one of those women on the internet pornography sites. Maureen's candidate has no brain, no record, no history, no family, no past statements, no existence except in her overheated imagination.

The internet porn candidate would be perfect, because, having no brain she couldn't be too smart, no record, so she could not have once voted in a way that some critic disagrees with, having no history, people would not simply be able to push a button on their computer to come up with witch lines about her, having no family, she would not remind them of their own sexual "unappetizing compromises, arrangements and dependencies" having no past statements, she would not have talked too much, and having no existence except as a hypothetical, she would never actually win. Anything.

But we could spend forever waiting for her, because we're not sexist bigots. It's just that no flesh and blood woman could ever satisfy our need for the perfect female. Meanwhile, for women? Good thing we have the internet.

Digg!

Tagged as: dowd, porn, media, women, sexism, election08

Linda Hirshman is the author of Get to Work ... And Get A Life Before It’s Too Late (Penguin 2007). A retired philosophy professor, she blogs at the New Republic, the American Prospect, TPMCafe, and elsewhere


Will Sarah Palin Have An Effect on the Women's Vote?
A recent survey shows mixed results.
Post by Heather Gehlert. September 7, 2008.
Is Palin a Step Backwards for Women in Power?
Sarah Palin is a milestone, for we achieve true gender equality when an incompetent woman goes as far as an incompetent man.
Post by Suzanne Braun Levine. September 5, 2008.
McCain Campaign Spins Sarah Palin's Teen Daughter's Pregnancy
Much ado about choice.
Post by Steve Benen. September 1, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Dowd's "A Flawed Feminist Test"
Posted by: cognitorex on Feb 14, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dowd's "A Flawed Feminist Test" doesn't rise to even the level of being sophmoric.
I am for Obama but I thought Dowd's piece denying Hillary her self earned due, on many levels, as so, so, close to almost the the first female President was nonsense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dowd's "A Flawed Feminist Test" Posted by: oregoncharles
Weird, empty post.
Posted by: oregoncharles on Feb 14, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I question the editing that posted this piece: as far as I can tell, it says nothing at all.

Especially considering the picture with it: there is a REAL "porn candidate," complete with name, history, etc. I wonder how many votes she got?

There was a real porn star in the Italian parliament for a while - I no longer remember her name, but she was better looking than Mary Carey.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wrong direction
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Feb 14, 2008 10:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess maureen just didn't think long enough. there were 2 great candidates or should I say women who could have been great candidates and would have received my support unconditionally. madeline allbright ,and Jean Kirkpatrick. both were smart,experienced tough as nails,and Iam certain, having witnessed their expertise on many occassion,could woop ass on any punk who tried to block them. Too badd this country isn't really interested in the best and the brightest,just the prettiest and the meanest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thebigkate
Posted by: Thebigkate on Feb 14, 2008 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not sure where the writer or commentors are coming from! I thought this was one of Maureen Dowd's more thoughtful columns, and I think she feels a great deal of sympathy for Hillary Clinton's dilemma of being married to "the backyard dog" who somehow manages to show up and humiliate her way too often. It is Hillary's issue, I think, that she has not defined herself clearly enough to her husband, or to her controlling campaign strategist, Mark Penn! If she has a flaw, it is that she has followed the dictates of these very narcissistic, flawed men and not her own head and heart! I think she is a smart, savvy woman and has been an excellent senator. For that position, she hasn't relied on these two men to win, and has therefore won handily! Sooooo....I would say her "flaw" is extreme codependency in her marriage and with her campaign strategist! I hope she fires Mark Penn and sends Bill to the Phillipines. Then let's see how much better her campaign does!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Hillary's notable flaw Posted by: herbal
Thebigkate
Posted by: Thebigkate on Feb 14, 2008 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not sure where the writer or commentors are coming from! I thought this was one of Maureen Dowd's more thoughtful columns, and I think she feels a great deal of sympathy for Hillary Clinton's dilemma of being married to "the backyard dog" who somehow manages to show up and humiliate her way too often. It is Hillary's issue, I think, that she has not defined herself clearly enough to her husband, or to her controlling campaign strategist, Mark Penn! If she has a flaw, it is that she has followed the dictates of these very narcissistic, flawed men and not her own head and heart! I think she is a smart, savvy woman and has been an excellent senator. For that position, she hasn't relied on these two men to win, and has therefore won handily! Sooooo....I would say her "flaw" is extreme codependency in her marriage and with her campaign strategist! I hope she fires Mark Penn and sends Bill to the Phillipines. Then let's see how much better her campaign does!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thebigkate
Posted by: Thebigkate on Feb 14, 2008 5:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not sure where the writer or commentors are coming from! I thought this was one of Maureen Dowd's more thoughtful columns, and I think she feels a great deal of sympathy for Hillary Clinton's dilemma of being married to "the backyard dog" who somehow manages to show up and humiliate her way too often. It is Hillary's issue, I think, that she has not defined herself clearly enough to her husband, or to her controlling campaign strategist, Mark Penn! If she has a flaw, it is that she has followed the dictates of these very narcissistic, flawed men and not her own head and heart! I think she is a smart, savvy woman and has been an excellent senator. For that position, she hasn't relied on these two men to win, and has therefore won handily! Sooooo....I would say her "flaw" is extreme codependency in her marriage and with her campaign strategist! I hope she fires Mark Penn and sends Bill to the Phillipines. Then let's see how much better her campaign does!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]