Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

White House Muddying the Waters on Gay Rights

Posted by Steve M., No More Mister Nice Blog at 4:24 AM on October 13, 2009.


The contradictions are the message.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

John Harwood went on CNBC yesterday and, in the context of a discussion of the gay-rights march, said that "the White House views this opposition as really part of the 'internet left fringe.'" We've since heard from a White House spokesman that that's not really the administration's attitude toward gay-rights activists or lefty bloggers, and Harwood has said that the quote is accurate but was a reference to lefty bloggers rather than gay activists.

I'm seeing this as a very deliberate self-contradiction two-step.

I saw the Bush White House do something like this back in 2004. There was a tough presidential race that year, and days before the Republicans were about to hold a convention in which they were going to fire up the base, very much including the religious-right base, Dick Cheney went out and said he personally supported allowing states to legalize gay marriage. That was clearly an attempt to mollify moderates without alienating fundamentalists -- the president still supported banning gay marriage altogether, as did the party platform, but soccer moms heard a different message.

The deliberate muddying of the message was the message.

That's what's going on now. Obama reached out to the gay community -- and yet he wants to be seen as not being tight with gays or the angrier lefties. So a friendly journalist leaked this remark -- this deniable remark -- which has since been, um, denied. And now the message is muddied. The mixed signals are meant, I think, to confuse supporters of gay rights and wavering but potentially Democratic-voting non-liberal voters (including non-white social conservatives) in, oh, say, New Jersey and Virginia.

Did I say "friendly journalist"? Yeah -- John Harwood seems quite close to the Obama White House. He's interviewed Obama a number of times during the campaign and presidency. I don't believe he'd have messed up his extraordinary access to the president by delivering a message the White House didn't want delivered.

But, as I say, it's a message the White House also wanted to deny. So it was made deniable.

I think most White Houses do things like this. That doesn't make them any less ugly.

Digg!

Tagged as: bush, cheney, obama, gay rights, marriage equality, same-cex marriage

Steve M. is the proprietor of No More Mister Nice Blog.


Utah Lawmaker: I Don't Mind "the Gays," but "I Don’t Want ‘Em Stuffing it Down My Throat all the Time"
"Certainly not in my kid's face."
Post by Zaid Jilani. November 20, 2009.
Hmmm ... Why Do So Many Wingnuts Have Such an Obsessive Fear of Being Raped?
It's all they can talk about in the right-wing media.
Post by Staff. November 20, 2009.
No Stupak Language in Senate Bill; Boxer "Couldn't Be Happier," Hatch Promises "Holy War"
Women's rights advocates have been holding their collective breath as the Senate hammered out its bill. So far, so good.
Post by Adele Stan. November 19, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A rising tide of expectations obviously does NOT raise all boats
Posted by: dogwhisperer on Oct 13, 2009 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the people Obama inspired and motivated start more and more wondering if it weren't all just beautiful words as detractors suggested, and when they begin to feel cynically used, the letdown is jarring. There is still some hope that more will happen, but a good friend of mine in Denmark just asked me this morning, "Shouldn't Obama get going soon???? Talking and talking. He has the majority, what is happening?"

And as Robert Reich aptly put it vis-a-vis the Peace Prize: "[Obama] has not yet delivered. To the contrary, he often seems to hold back from the fight -- temporizing, delaying, or compromising so much that the rhetoric and insight he offers seem strangely disconnected from what he actually does."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heterosexuals (as a group) Hate Gays & Lesbians
Posted by: George DeCarlo on Oct 14, 2009 1:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is about time that Gays & Lesbians realize that heterosexuals hate us. I say as a group since some of the heterosexuals that do not hate us will be offended. As I have told them in the past, use your offense towards others of your kind.

Barry Obama is just playing a game for support and votes since he like the clear majority of heterosexuals does not want us the have Full Equal Rights. He has even written this in his book.

See some heterosexuals while not fully hating us only want us to have some civil and human rights. Isn't that just hetero of them.

When will heterosexual oppression against Gays & Lesbians end? With Barry, not soon enough.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]