Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Michelle Obama Cooks Up Quite a Political Dish on the Food Network

Posted by Christy Hardin Smith, Firedoglake at 4:31 PM on September 22, 2008.


Both campaigns have been trying to the attention of female viewers -- during talk shows, soap operas, you name it.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get PEEK in your
mailbox!

 

Michelle Obama scored a huge coup, with an appearance on Paula's Party on Food Network, taking her "home cooking mama" appeal straight to the most sought-after demographic this year: women.  Get this from People Magazine:

"She was everything I thought she would be: Smart, great sense of humor and loves to talk about family," Deen told PEOPLE of meeting Mrs. Obama.

The pair prepared fried shrimp for Deen's show and Deen said, "I can tell she spends time in the kitchen – she was very relaxed when we cooked. And that lady is a good eater."

Not that it shows. "Did I tell you she is in the best shape ever? Everyone was staring at her amazing arms!" said Deen.

Food Network doesn't allow political ads, so this was huge in terms of reach-out.  Both campaigns have been running ads designed to hit female viewers -- during talk shows, soap operas, you name it.  Demographic strategery.

This year, the NYTimes writes about the Oprah-ization of campaign marketing to women. And Karen Tumulty at Time has hit on a "maxed-out moms" phrasing for the volatile bloc candidates are courting. 

We've said repeatedly that women's voices are key as we've urged more political involvement for women for the last several years.  But this year's outreach to women has been broader in its appeal.

There's policy wonkery, sure, but also a decided "every woman" bent from both campaigns: from People to USWeekly, from Vogue to Ladies Home Journal, from Ellen to The View.  Both are reaching out to not-so-politically-motivated women.

If it encourages women to get active, make things better, ask tough questions, then I'm all for it.  But I'm not sure it does.  What do you think?


Cheney Looks Awkward as Pelosi Interrupts Him to Applaud Obama's Victory
Vice President Cheney stood before Congress and read the official results of the 2008 presidential election. It's now officially official.
Post by Amanda Terkel. January 8, 2009.
Obama Can Learn from Bush: 'We Tried' Ain't Enough
We will need to remind Obama again and again that for those voters concerned about immigration, 'almost' just ain't gonna cut it come 2012.
Post by Paco Fabian. January 8, 2009.
Rachel Maddow on 'Daily Show': 'Insulted,' 'Embarrassed' By Bush
Jon Stewart and Maddow talk Bush, Obama, Bill Clinton, MSNBC, and the Munsters.
Post by Danny Shea. January 8, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
food shows?
Posted by: luzmejor on Sep 23, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, everyone eats and most of us cook, but does that mean many of us can watch cooking shows?

I would really love to see Michelle interviewed on a news show like Rachel Maddow.

Has anyone else noticed that Republican women are totally artificial objects but the Democrats have always been intelligent and honest?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whose assumptions?
Posted by: carolcsme on Sep 23, 2008 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am frustrated - Did the author even see the show, or just read an article in a magazine which mentioned the appearance? I wanted to know what they cooked and what was talked about. I am not a happy reader. I went to the show's website, and no clips are available, so I am guessing the author made a posting from her own musings while in the grocery line - and I am burnt.

I would also point out that neither Michelle Obama nor Cindy McCain is your typical candidate's wife. McCain has a puer complex - she thinks she's an only child (when both of her parents each had an earlier child - she's a baby not an only), a philanthropist, and above campaign law requiring transparency of financial means. If she didn't have the financial means, she would be in jail for feeding her addiction through her "philanthropy" and she wouldn't be married to and supporting a presidential candidate, nor refusing to disclose her/his means. Obama is interesting in her own right, by personal achievement, and I'd have a blast cooking with her. Excuse me, but I will not lose 20 IQ points if I cook, and I hardly see why anyone else should see cooking that way. What is sad is that we don't get to see the real people due to all of the agendas and assumptions.

How I learn about people is watching how they move, initiate action, and respond, incluuding their vocal tones and mannerisms. The actual words carry so little of the communication, even when they are loaded with factual data.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Whose assumptions? Posted by: Ethical1